[Par-lite] Parshat Beshalach - shiur #1
Menachem Leibtag
tsc at bezeqint.net
Thu Feb 5 03:59:10 EST 2009
*************************************************************************
THE TANACH STUDY CENTER www.tanach.org
In Memory of Rabbi Abraham Leibtag
Shiurim in Chumash & Navi by Menachem Leibtag
*************************************************************************
PARSHAT BESHALACH - A Desert Seminar
ALL ON THE WAY TO HAR SINAI
[revised 5769]
Bnei Yisrael's journey from Egypt to Har Sinai was certainly not
easy. Instead of the anticipated cheerful 'three day journey', Bnei Yisrael
endured several weeks of life-threatening situations - including lack of
food & water, and military attacks by both Egypt and Amalek.
Did something go wrong, or were all of these events part of God's
original 'plan'?
Furthermore, if these 'tests of faith' were indeed part of a divine
'plan' - did God really expect for Bnei Yisrael not to complain?
To answer these questions, this week's shiur analyzes the
progressive nature of the events that occur from the time that Bnei Yisrael
leave Egypt until they reach Har Sinai, while considering their relationship
to the overall theme of Sefer Shmot.
INTRODUCTION - THREE DAYS OR SEVEN WEEKS?
Prior to the actual Exodus, God had made several specific promises
that He would take Bnei Yisrael from Egypt to the Promised Land (see Shmot
3:16-17 and 6:5-8, as well as Breishit 15:13-18); yet we never found even a
hint that God wanted Bnei Yisrael to dwell for any length of time in the
desert (other than to cross it). True, Moshe had told Pharaoh that Bnei
Yisrael requested a three day journey to worship God in the desert; however,
Moshe was never instructed to convey that message to his own people.
Hence, it only makes sense that Bnei Yisrael would expect to travel directly
from Egypt to Eretz Canaan.
Furthermore, the opening pasuk of Parshat Beshalach implies that traveling
directly to Eretz Canaan remained the primary goal of the Exodus, while the
're-routing' of that journey (to the southeast) was simply a 'maneuver'
taken due to 'military considerations' (see 13:17, and 14:1-3).
However, in Parshat Beshalach, a very different set of events
unfold. Instead of leading Bnei Yisrael directly to Israel (or to stop at
Har Sinai on the way to Israel), God reroutes their journey towards the Red
Sea. Then, after crossing the Red Sea, Bnei Yisrael do embark on a
'three-day journey' into the desert, but only to arrive at 'Mara', rather
than 'Har Sinai'. Then, over the course of their five-week excursion from
Mara to Har Sinai, they run out of food at Midbar Sin, run out of water at
Refidim and then face Amalek's unprovoked attack. Only after some six weeks
do they finally arrive at Har Sinai.
In the following shiur we will attempt to find the purpose of this
sequence of events - by considering the underlying reason for Bnei Yisrael's
redemption from Egypt.
A SECOND CHANCE
In our study thus far of Sefer Shmot, we have shown how the Exodus
served as a fulfillment of God's covenant with Avraham Avinu (at "brit bein
ha'btarim"). However, the purpose of that covenant was not merely to
promise Avraham's offspring salvation from a future oppressor; rather God
was 'planting the seeds' of a people that were to become His model nation -
to make His Name known to all nations.
>From this perspective, the redemption that God promised in "brit bein
ha'btarim" was only the first stage in a long historical process. After
their redemption from Egypt, Bnei Yisrael would first need to receive the
special set of laws and guidelines (better known as 'Matan Torah') - that
would facilitate their becoming that 'model nation'. After receiving and
studying those laws, the nation would be 'spiritually' ready to inherit the
Promised Land.
For this very reason, God found it necessary to first call upon Bnei
Yisrael to perform 'teshuva' [repentance] even before the Exodus began.
[See Yechezkel 20:4-10, and our shiur on Parshat Va'era.] Presumably, had
Bnei Yisrael indeed obeyed that original call, the redemption process could
have proceeded as originally planned, i.e. the nation would have traveled
directly to Har Sinai (in three days) - to thank God and receive the Torah.
(See Seforno's introduction to Sefer Shmot; see also Ibn Ezra, Rashbam,
Ramban and Seforno on 2:23-25.)
Unfortunately, the nation did not repent in the manner that God had
expected. As we explained in last week's shiur, the offering of the 'korban
Pesach' may have rendered them worthy 'just enough' to survive the Tenth
Plague; nevertheless, at the time of the Exodus Bnei Yisrael were far from
being 'spiritually ready' for Matan Torah. Therefore, we posit that God
found it necessary to first challenge His people with a series of 'tests'
(as described in Parshat Beshalach) - to help prepare them for Matan Torah!
THE NEW PLAN
The following table lists the key events that take place during Bnei
Yisrael's journey from Egypt to Har Sinai:
LOCATION EVENT
1) Yam Suf (14:11) Am Yisrael is attacked by Mitzraim;
2) Mara (15:24) the water is bitter;
3) Midbar Sin (15:2) there is no food to eat;
4) Refidim I (17:3) there is no water to drink;
5) Refidim II (17:8) Am Yisrael is attacked by Amalek.
[Note the chiastic structure: war-water-food-water-war.]
Despite the distinctive nature of each of these events, we will show
how and why God intentionally initiates these incidents in order to catalyze
Bnei Yisrael's spiritual growth, to 'train' them to become His Nation!
To appreciate the specific purpose of each individual event, we must
first consider WHY Bnei Yisrael had not performed proper 'teshuva' in Egypt.
BREAKING SLAVE MENTALITY
It is extremely difficult for a slave, even after having gained his
freedom, to act or think like a free man. As we explained in Parshat
Va'era, Bnei Yisrael did not listen to God's original call because of their
'crushed spirits and hard labor': "v'e-lo sham'u el Moshe, mi-kotzer ruach
u-meavoda kasha" (see 6:9).
The strain of their prolonged bondage and the fatigue of their daily
routine had drained them of all spirituality.
Specifically because of this bondage - Bnei Yisrael had grown
instinctively dependent upon their Egyptian masters. Therefore, to
facilitate their transformation - from Pharaoh's slaves to God's servants -
they must change their instinctive physical dependence on Egypt to a
cognitive spiritual dependence on God. [See an amazing Ibn Ezra on Shmot
14:10 for a discussion of this topic.]
We all know how difficult it is for an individual to change his
character, all the more so for an entire nation. Therefore, the rebuilding
of Am Yisrael's character becomes a very complex process. This background
can help us understand the need for the variety of events that transpire
from the time that Bnei Yisrael leave Egypt. To explain how, we will show
how that a change of character occurs in one of two patterns - via:
1) A traumatic experience - which may facilitate a sudden change.
2) A change of daily routine - which affects instinctive behavior.
As we will see, God employs both approaches.
1) KRIYAT YAM SUF - SPLITTING OLD TIES
Kriyat Yam Suf [the splitting of the Red Sea] may be understood as
the traumatic experience that helps Bnei Yisrael break away from their
instinctive dependence upon Egypt.
Recall that, at Kriyat Yam Suf, God inflicted His final punishment
upon Pharaoh and his army (14:4). Were God's sole intention merely to
punish the Egyptians, He could have done so during the Ten Plagues. The
fact that Bnei Yisrael must witness this Egyptian defeat suggests that these
events occur for the sake of Bnei Yisrael as well.
This purpose becomes clearer in light of Bnei Yisrael's reaction to the
imminent threat of the approaching Egyptian army:
"And they complained to Moshe saying... What have you done to us by taking
us out of Egypt? Is this not the very thing we told you in Egypt: Let us be
and we will serve the Egyptians, for it is better for us to serve the
Egyptians than die in the desert?!" (14:11-12)
[See Ibn Ezra on 14:13 where he explains why Bnei Yisrael did not even
consider confronting the Egyptians in battle.]
God responds to Bnei Yisrael's complaint by commanding them to
'break away' from this instinctive dependence:
"Do not fear, stand upright and watch God's salvation... for the manner in
which you see Mitzraim today - you will never see them again" ["lo tosifu
lir'otam od ad olam"] (14:13).
Although God's reassurance appears to be a promise, for some reason
Chazal interpret this statement as a commandment! According to Ramban
(14:13), Chazal interpret this pasuk as follows:
"In the manner by which you look at Mitzraim today - do not look at them
this way ever again" (14:13).
God here does not promise His nation that they will never face an
Egyptian army again. Rather, He commands them to 'never again' look to
Egypt for their salvation.
Although this interpretation of "lo tosifu lir'otam" does not appear
to be the simple 'pshat' of this pasuk, it does find support in a parallel
reference in the 'tochacha' in Parshat Ki Tavo (see Devarim 28:1-69). At
the conclusion of that lengthy rebuke, God warns Bnei Yisrael that - should
they disobey Him - they will be exiled and sold into slavery (see Devarim
28:62-67 / note "ki lo shama'ta be-kol Hashem..."). Their condition will
deteriorate to such an extent, the Torah warns, that they will actually hope
that someone will 'purchase them as slaves'.
To emphasize this point, note how the end of that Tochacha employs a
phrase very similar to the phrase used to describe God's command before
"kriyat Yam Suf":
"And God will return you to Egypt in ships, in the manner that I told you:
'lo tosif od lir'otah" [do not look at them this way again], and you will
offer yourselves to your enemies for sale as slaves and maidservants, but no
one will purchase you" (28:68).
[The word 'ba-derech' - 'in the manner' - should not be understood as a
description of the ship-route to Egypt, but rather as a description of their
'state of mind' as they are exiled to Egypt inside of those crowded ships.]
Ironically, the last stage of the 'tochacha' has Am Yisrael
returning to the same state they were in before they left Egypt, where they
yearn for total dependence on their human masters! In the slave-market,
their only hope for survival would be for an Egyptian to buy them (to become
his slave); otherwise they will starve to death. [See also Devarim 17:16 &
Yeshayahu 31:1-3 to support this interpretation of "lo tosifu li'rotam...".]
Thus, after the miracle of "kriyat Yam Suf", it appears as though
God's plan had succeeded. Upon seeing the drowning of the Egyptians, Bnei
Yisrael arrive at the 'proper' conclusion:
"...and Yisrael recognized His great Hand.. and the people feared God and
believed in God and Moshe His servant"
(Shmot
14:30-31).
Then,
They instinctively respond with a song of praise to God:
"Az yashir Moshe u-vnei Yisrael..." (see 15:1).
2) MARA - A DESERT SEMINAR
After crossing the Red Sea, Bnei Yisrael set out on their
'three-day journey' into the desert. However, instead of arriving at Har
Sinai, they arrive at Mara, where the only water they could find is bitter
and hence undrinkable (see 15:22-23). As we'd expect, the people complain
to Moshe, their leader; who in turns complains to God. As their complaints
appear to be justified, God provides Moshe with a solution to 'sweeten' the
water (see 15:24-25).
Certainly God realized that the people could not survive without
water, nonetheless He led them to a location without water - in order that
the people would complain. In this manner, God teaches the nation not to
take their water supply for granted; rather - it now becomes clear to them
that their physical survival is dependent upon God - who now tends to their
water supply. [Recall that in Egypt, the Nile River supplied drinking water
for the entire country, and hence it became like a God to Egypt - and
Pharaoh considered himself as the god-like master over the Nile / see
Yechezkel 29:1-3.]
Now, after these two traumatic events have shown the nation who their real
'master' is, Chumash informs us how God gives the people another chance to
show their readiness to accept His laws:
"And He said - im shamoa tishma le-kol Hashem Elokecha - Should you listen
to the voice of God, and do what is proper in His eyes, and listen to His
commandments, then the affliction that I put on the Egyptians I will not put
on you, for I am God your Healer" (15:26 / see shiur on Parshat Va'era.).
Note how Bnei Yisrael's acceptance of this offer can 'cure' their
original 'attitude problem' reflected by "ve-lo sham'u el Moshe..." (see
6:9, and our shiur on Parshat Va'era).
Furthermore, by linking the sweetness of the water to their readiness to
obey His laws, God teaches Bnei Yisrael an important lesson of spiritual
dependence. This connection between 'water' and 'following God' will emerge
numerous times in Chumash, and forms the basis of the famous Midrash Chazal
of 'ein mayim ela Torah' - that the term 'water' in Tanach symbolically
refers to Torah.
[The 'message' of the 'eitz' which God instructs Moshe to cast into the
water (see 15:23-25) may also relate back to Gan Eden, itself a motif of an
environment that demands obedience to God. See also Mishlei 3:18 and its
context ("etz chayim hi la-machazikim bah...").]
A 'MODEL CAMP' FOR A 'MODEL NATION'
At their next camp-site, at Eilim (see15:27), God gives Am Yisrael a
short 'rest' - as there is plenty of water and food. But note how they 'just
so happen' to find twelve springs and seventy palm trees!
The 'twelve springs' obviously reflect the twelve Tribes. [Recall
the twelve monuments erected at Har Sinai to represent Am Yisrael when they
accept the covenant in Shmot 24:4-7.] We posit as well that the seventy
palm trees represent the 'seventy nations'. Just as the spring provides
'water' - so the trees can bear their best fruit; so too when Bnei Yisrael
will become a nation properly keeping God's Laws, the other nations can
learn form this 'model' and thus reach their fullest potential.
After this educational 'time out', Bnei Yisrael arrive in Midbar Sin, where
God creates yet another crisis.
3) MIDBAR SIN - BASIC TRAINING
After arriving in Midbar Sin, the food supply runs out, triggering
yet another round of complaints (16:2-3). Even though Bnei Yisrael have the
right to ask for food, the way in which they ask is inexcusable:
"If only we had died by the Hand of God in Egypt, when we had plenty of meat
and bread to eat! Now you have brought us out into this desert to die of
famine" (16:3).
The very tone of their complaint (and its content), indicate that
Bnei Yisrael had retained their instinctive dependence upon Mitzraim. Their
instinctive reaction to this terrible hunger includes reminiscing about the
'good old days' in Egypt. The trauma they had experienced heretofore was
not sufficient to totally change their character. To rectify this, God will
force them into a daily routine that hopefully will slowly change their
instinctive behavior.
The manna served this very purpose, as it provided a daily routine
that transformed what was once their physical dependence on Mitzraim into a
physical dependence on God. As explained in Sefer Devarim:
"And He tormented you and starved you, then gave you 'manna' to eat... in
order to teach you that man does not live on bread alone, rather, man lives
by whatever God commands" (Devarim 8:3).
By allowing only enough food for one day at a time, Bnei Yisrael
learn to become dependent solely on God. To emphasize this point, their
food falls directly from heaven. Note how the Torah uses a key word -
'nisayon' (a test) in its description of the purpose of the manna:
"Behold I will rain down bread for you from the heavens, and the people
shall go out and gather each day that day's portion - lema'an anasenu (=
'nisayon') - in order that I may test them, to see whether or not they will
follow my instructions..." (16:4).
The word "nisayon" here should not be understood simply as a 'test'
that will help God assess Bnei Yisrael's obedience. The purpose of this
"nisayon" was to raise the nation to a higher level in their relationship
with God. In a similar manner, we find that the Torah uses this same root
in the story of the Akeida where God 'tests' Avraham ["ve-Hashem nisa et
Avraham..." /see Breishit 22:1] - not to find out if he is worthy, but
rather to make him worthy.
The manna served a similar purpose. God is not testing Bnei Yisrael
to find out IF they will obey Him, rather He is training them in order that
they learn HOW to obey Him.
4) REFIDIM - PREPARING FOR HAR SINAI
The next stop on their journey (and the last stop before arriving at
Har Sinai) is Refidim - where they can't find any water to drink (17:1-3).
But why does God lead them to such a location? Certainly He realizes that
Bnei Yisrael cannot survive without water.
Once again, God wants Bnei Yisrael to complain!
However, this time God's plan is more complex, as His scheme at
Refidim will prepare Bnei Yisrael both physically and spiritually for Har
Sinai. As you review the details of that story (see 17:1-6), note how God
solves their water shortage.
As you probably remember, God instructs Moshe to hit the rock - and it would
supply water. But we would expect that rock (and hence the water source) to
be in Refidim - where the people are suffering from thirst. Instead, God
instructs Moshe to gather some elders (see 17:5-6) and travel from Refidim
to the rock at "Chorev " - the same site where God first appeared to him at
the burning bush (see 3:1) - the same site that later becomes Har Sinai!
[See Shmot 3:12 & Devarim 5:2.]
But would it not have made more sense for God to supply this dearly needed
water at Refidim, where the people are encamped!
One could suggest that God is providing water purposely only at Har Sinai,
for He wants the nation to first encounter Har Sinai as a source for their
physical salvation - that will quench their terrible thirst. By providing
water at Har Sinai, the nation will now eagerly travel from Refidim directly
to Har Sinai.
Note the wording 17:5, where God instructs Moshe to take his staff with
which 'he hit the Nile' - to hit the rock at Chorev. Even though Moshe's
staff also turned into a "nachash", and had also split the sea, etc. - yet
God specifically refers to it here as the one with which he 'hit the Nile' -
for Har Sinai will now become the new source of water for Bnei Yisrael,
replacing their old source of water - the mighty Nile River of Egypt.
Let's consider the reality of this situation. After Moshe hits the rock,
the water would gush forth from Chorev and flow into the desert. But to
drink that water, Bnei Yisrael will need to travel from Refidim to Har
Sinai, to their new source of water. [For proof that hitting the rock
created a gushing river flowing down the mountain - see Devarim 9:21.]
This initial encounter with Mount Sinai - where it becomes the
source for their physical existence, sets the stage for Matan Torah, when
Har Sinai will become the source for their spiritual existence. Not only
has heaven replaced earth as the source of bread (the manna food), but now
Har Sinai has replaced the Nile as their constant source of water.
In this manner, Bnei Yisrael's total dependence on Mitzraim has now been
replaced by their total dependence on God.
5) THE WAR WITH AMALEK - LOOKING UP TO HAR SINAI
As Bnei Yisrael begin their journey from Refidim to Har Sinai (to
their new source of water), Amalek attacks. War breaks out, and God orders
that Yehoshua lead Bnei Yisrael in battle.
In contrast to passive nature of Bnei Yisrael's participation in battle
against the Egyptian army - when God split the Red Sea, here Bnei Yisrael do
the fighting themselves. But to assure that the people recognize that God
Himself brings them victory - despite their own military efforts - God
instructs Moshe to climb the hill and raise his staff heavenward. Upon
which hill does Moshe stand?
Based on the juxtaposition between this narrative and the incident
at 'masa u-meriva', Ibn Ezra explains that Moshe stands with his hands
raised high - on Har Sinai! Just as Har Sinai has become their source of
water, it now becomes their source of military salvation, as well.
For Yisrael to become victorious, Moshe must raise his hands (see 17:11) to
show and teach the people to look to Hashem, to Har Sinai, for their
salvation.
[See Midrash in Rashi (17:11) & Rosh Hashana 29:1.]
FROM PESACH TO SHAVUOT
We have shown that during the seven weeks from the Exodus to Har
Sinai, Bnei Yisrael encounter several traumatic experiences and changes in
their daily routine that helped prepare them for Matan Torah. During this
'training period' they have also become more active in the process of their
redemption - they are now ready to take on the next stage of the redemption
process: to receive the Torah in order to become God's special Nation in His
land.
Not only was this seven week time period significant for Bnei
Yisrael at the time of Exodus, this same time period of the year remains no
less significant for future generations as well. It is not by chance that
Chazal identify a similar purpose in the seven weeks of the Sefirat ha-Omer,
where we count the seven weeks from the celebration of our freedom from
Egypt [on Pesach] in preparation for our commemoration of Matan Torah on
Shavuot.
Each year, after we thank God for our freedom from slavery, we
prepare ourselves for seven weeks - to become worthy of, and to be thankful
for - our receiving of the Torah.
shabbat shalom,
menachem
=================
FOR FURTHER IYUN
Many traditional sources indicate that Bnei Yisrael required an
educational process of one sort or another upon their departure from Egypt
in order to recover from the effects of the lengthy period of bondage. The
type of process required comes in two forms: PHYSICAL & SPIRITUAL
PHYSICAL
Military training and the development of confidence. Several
mefarshim emphasize that, as they leave Egypt, Bnei Yisrael are in no
position to conduct a war - the implication of the opening pasuk of Parshat
Beshalach ("pen yinachem ha-am bir'otam milchama. "). The Ibn Ezra stresses
this point at least twice in his commentary (peirush ha-katzar - 13:17;
peirush ha-aroch - 14:13).
The Ibn Ezra (in the second source mentioned) goes so far as to say
that Hashem had to see to it that this generation would die in the
wilderness rather than enter the land, because the period of bondage had
crushed their spirits to the point where they would never be able to fight
for the land. (This comment obviously has ramifications with regards to the
sin of the spies and other related topics.)
The Malbim (commenting on the parsha's opening pasuk) likewise writes that
Benei Yisrael needed time to develop the courage necessary to wage war.
Hashem therefore decided not to lead them along the shortest route to
Canaan.
The Abarbanel comments that the second pasuk of the parsha mentions Bnei
Yisrael's being equipped with arms to emphasize that their resources were
useless as they had no heart for battle.
The Rambam (Moreh Nevuchim 3:24, 32) writes that the grueling experience of
the wilderness travel was necessary to physically prepare Bnei Yisrael for
the conquest.
SPIRITUAL
Spiritual rehabilitation - the approach we take in the shiur. Within this
approach, however, we find two versions: Bnei Yisrael's spiritual growth is
necessary as preparation for Matan Torah, or for their entry into Eretz
Canaan.
In the shiur we adopt the former view, which appears explicitly in Rabbenu
Bechaye's comments to the opening pasuk of the parsha. He writes that all
the travails that Bnei Yisrael experienced constituted a 'nisayon' - "in
order that their inner intellect would grow in the levels of trust [in
Hashem], which forms the root of faith, in order that they are worthy to
receive the Torah." This approach may have a much earlier source, as well.
The Midrash Tanchuma (Yitro 10) writes that Hashem did not give Bnei Yisrael
the Torah immediately upon their departure from Egypt because they had
'blemishes'. A recovery period was therefore necessary before they could
receive the Torah. The Abarbanel (Yitro 19) interprets these 'blemishes' as
the spiritual influence of Egypt. As we claim in the shiur, he explains
that the miracles at sea and in the wilderness cured these spiritual ills by
reinforcing Bnei Yisrael's trust in Hashem.
In a similar vein, the Alshich (14:10) writes that the Yam Suf experience
was necessary in order to prevent any arrogance on Bnei Yisrael's part. The
threat posed at the sea humbled them in preparation for Matan Torah. Later,
in his comments to 19:1, the Alshich compares the process that Bnei Yisrael
undergo during this period to the period of purification required after the
onset of certain forms of tum'a. Yetziat Mitzraim constituted the cessation
of tum'a; the following seven weeks correspond to the 'shiv'a nekiyim' - the
seven 'clean days' - that spiritually prepared them for Matan Torah.
On a more kabbalistic level, the Ramchal (Choker U-mekubal 18) writes that
after Bnei Yisrael had sunken to the forty-nine 'levels of impurity' in
Egypt, over the next 49 days Hashem shone upon them the forty-nine 'levels
of sanctity' to render them worthy of Matan Torah. All this relates to the
point made in the shiur, that the events that occurred in between yetziat
Mitzraim and Matan Torah served to spiritually prepare Bnei Yisrael for
Matan Torah.
By contrast, Rav Meir Simcha Hakohen of Dvinsk (Meshech Chochma) and the
Netziv (in He-amek Davar) maintain that Hashem led the people into the
wilderness in order to spiritually prepare them for their entry into the
land.
Rav Meir Simcha focuses specifically on the need for Bnei Yisrael to rid
themselves of Egyptian paganism; the Netziv speaks more generally about the
need for Bnei Yisrael to establish their individual character, which
necessitated a journey through the wilderness, far away from other societies
and cultures.
We should perhaps note in this context a passage in Pirkei De-Rabbi Eliezer
42, which states that, as Bnei Yisrael saw the Egyptians closing in on them
at sea, they repented and discarded their Egyptian idols. Apparently, they
had not adequately repented from their avoda zara while in Egypt.
There are also indications of the fact that Bnei Yisrael had not yet
broken their sense of dependence on Egypt, for one reason or another. The
Mechilta (on the first pasuk of the parsha) writes that Pharaoh had sent
escorts to accompany Bnei Yisrael as they departed from Egypt.
Rav Baruch Epstein (Torah Temima) and Rav Dov Rabinowitz (Da'at Sofrim) use
this Midrash to explain how Bnei Yisrael could have considered returning to
Egypt (as Hashem was concerned about - "ve-shavu Mitzrayma"). As the
Egyptians had begun treating Bnei Yisrael with dignity, they felt that all
the plagues and miracles had brought about a change of heart on the part of
the Egyptians. Thus, Bnei Yisrael had yet to turn their backs entirely on
Egypt.
Furthermore, the Da'at Sofrim notes that the parsha's opening pasuk
describes yetziat Mitzraim as "be-shalach Par'o et ha-am" - Pharaoh letting
the people go, rather than Hashem taking them out. (This was noted already
by the Abarbanel, who explains differently; see also Oznayim La-Torah and
Nechama Leibowitz's Studies on this parsha, 1.)
Da'at Sofrim explains that Bnei Yisrael still felt dependent on Pharaoh's
decision to set them free, rather than guided by Hashem's providence. An
extreme expression of Bnei Yisrael's continued sense of dependence on Egypt
appears in the Akeidat Yitzchak, in his comments to 14:11. He claims that
Bnei Yisrael had thought that Hashem intended for them to live permanently
in Ramses (as they had when Yaakov and his family first resettled in Egypt).
It was Moshe, they felt, who forced them to leave Ramses and continue into
the wilderness. This clearly reflects that they had not yet seen themselves
as an independent nation. They were content to live as free people under
Egyptian rule; they had not resigned themselves to the fact that they would
establish their own society in Canaan.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.atlchai.org/pipermail/par-lite/attachments/20090205/bfe5f6c7/attachment-0001.htm
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: bshal1.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 55445 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.atlchai.org/pipermail/par-lite/attachments/20090205/bfe5f6c7/attachment-0001.pdf
More information about the Par-lite
mailing list