[Par-lite] For Parshat Kedoshim
Menachem Leibtag
tsc at bezeqint.net
Wed Apr 21 11:47:31 EDT 2010
**********************************************************
***
THE TANACH STUDY CENTER [http://www.tanach.org]
In Memory of Rabbi Abraham Leibtag
Shiurim in Chumash & Navi by Menachem Leibtag
**********************************************************
***
PARSHAT KEDOSHIM -shiur #1
PARSHAT KEDOSHIM & THE TEN COMMANDMENTS
It's not very difficult to find the Ten Commandments
'hiding' in Parshat Kedoshim, at least most of them. [See
Ramban, Ibn Ezra, and Chizkuni on 19:2.]
In the following shiur, we study the nature of this
parallel (and its 'missing links') in an attempt to
uncover
its deeper meaning.
INTRODUCTION
In the first four psukim of Parshat Kedoshim, the
parallels to some of the 'dibrot' [the Ten Commandments]
are
rather obvious [e.g. honoring one's parents, keeping
Shabbat,
idol worship etc.]. However, as the Parsha continues, the
parallels become less obvious, and as we will see, some of
the
parallels to the dibrot become rather 'stretched' and
others
appear to be missing!
Nonetheless, it would be logical to assume that there
must
be a deeper reason for these parallels, and the manner of
their presentation.
We begin our shiur by taking note of an interesting
internal
pattern within Parshat Kedoshim, that may help us 'crack
the
code'.
THE ANI HASHEM DELIMITERS
As you review the first 18 psukim of Parshat
Kedoshim,
note how the 'refrain' ANI HASHEM is repeated EIGHT TIMES
(at
the end of just about every other pasuk). Note as well
how
this refrain appears in two different forms:
ANI HASHEM ELOKEICHEM - the first four (see 19:1-10);
ANI HASHEM - the next four times (see 19:11-18).
This pattern suggests that these mitzvot divide into
TWO
groups. The distinction between them is also rather
obvious:
. The ANI HASHEM ELOKEICHEM group contains primarily
mitzvot 'bein adam la-Makom' (between man & God) and
hence is
parallel to the first five DIBROT;
. The ANI HASHEM group contains primarily mitzvot which
are
'bein adam le-chaveiro' (between man and his fellow man),
and
hence is parallel to the last five DIBROT.
To verify this, note how the ANI HASHEM ELOKEICHEM
group
contains obvious parallels to four of the five first
DIBROT:
. I. ANOCHI (see 19:2);
. II. LO YIHIYEH (see 19:4);
. III. LO TISA - [no apparent parallel]
. IV. SHABBAT (see 19:3); &
. V. KIBBUD AV (see 19:3).
Note, however, that we have two problems. First of
all,
we did not find any obvious parallel for the third
Commandment. But we also did not find any parallel for
the
laws discussed in 19:5-10 [i.e. the laws of 'pigul' and
'pe'a'
etc.]. Before we return to this question, let's take a
look
at the second group:
In the ANI HASHEM group (see 19:12,14,16,18) we find
a
variety of mitzvot bein adam le-chaveiro, the most obvious
parallels to the last five DIBROT being:
. VI. LO TIRTZACH - 'lo ta'amod al dam re'echa'
(19:15)
. VII. LO TIN'AF - the laws of 'shifcha
charufa'(19:20-22)
. VIII. LO TIGNOV - 'lo tignovu...' (see 19:11)
. IX. LO TA'ANEH be-re'acha ED SHAKER - 'lo tishav'u
bi-
shmi la-SHAKER..." (see 19:12).
. X. LO TACHMOD - 'lo ta'ashok et re'acha ...'
(19:18).
Even though some of these parallels are a bit
stronger
than others, all of the mitzvot in this section can
definitely
be categorized according to one of the last five DIBROT.
Let's return now to our question, i.e. we are missing
a
parallel for the third DIBBUR - LO TISA ET SHEM HASHEM
ELOKEICHA LA-SHAV - in the ANI HASHEM ELOKEICHEM group.
Bothered by this question, Chizkuni (based on Vayikra
Rabba 24:5) suggests that LO TISA is parallel to 'lo
tishav'u
bi-shmi la-shaker' (see 19:12). However, that parallel
would
'violate' the pattern that we discerned above, for the
parallel should be found within the ANI HASHEM ELOKEICHEM
group, i.e. in the first ten psukim.
Furthermore, based on the context of 19:12 - Lo
tishav'u
bi-shmi la-SHAKER - and noting the use of the word
'shaker' -
its parallel to 'lo taaneh be-re'acha ed SHAKER'
(Commandment
#9) appears to be much more convincing. [This also keeps
it
in the ANI HASHEM group.]
THE MISSING 'LINK'
Let's return to the pattern set by the phrase "ANI
HASHEM
ELOKEICHEM". Using the 'process of elimination', the
parallel
to the third Commandment [LO TISA] must be located
somewhere
within the mitzvot discussed between 19:5 and 19:10.
However,
these psukim simply discuss primarily the laws of 'pigul',
a
law that contains no obvious parallel to 'not stating
God's
Name in vain'.
On the other hand, the pattern that we have seen thus
far
'begs' us to look for a connection; so let's give it a
try.
To do so, we must first explain the law of pigul.
The korban SHLAMIM is a voluntary offering that can
be
eaten by the owner; however, its meat must be consumed on
that
same day or the next (see Vayikra 7:16-18). Parshat
Kedoshim
presents this law once again (see 19:5-8), adding the
information that the punishment for eating the meat
outside of
this time frame is 'karet' - being 'cut-off' from the
people
of Israel (see 19:8!) - one of the most stringent of
Biblical
punishments.
Interestingly, Chazal [our Sages] interpret this
prohibition in an even more stringent manner. They claim
that
the primary prohibition is not necessarily eating the
korban
on the third day, but rather simply THINKING about eating
the
KORBAN outside of its time frame! In other words, if at
the
time of offering this sacrifice, one merely thinks about
eating its meat outside of its time frame - the offering
is
rendered PIGUL - and he who does so will be punished with
KARET! [Even if the meat is never eaten at the wrong
time.]
This strange law raises two questions. First of all,
why
would someone think of doing so in the first place?
Secondly,
let's say he does, why is the punishment for simply
'thinking
about it' so severe? And finally, what is so terrible if
one
eats from this korban for an extra day? Is it really
better
that he should let the meat 'go to waste'?
'THINKING' IS WORSE THAN EATING!
To understand the logic behind the law of PIGUL, we
must
consider that is quite impossible for a single person to
consume the meat of an entire animal in a day or two.
Therefore, practically speaking, the Torah's prohibition
against eating the meat of a shlamim outside its time
frame
forces the individual to SHARE the meat of this korban
with
others!
[Recall as well that the korban must also be consumed
within the walls of Yerushalayim. Therefore, the option
of
bringing the korban 'home' to share with his family is
also
precluded.]
Let's say that are assumption is correct that the
owner
of the KORBAN has no choice other than to share his korban
SHLAMIM with other visitors in Yerushalayim.
Consequently, we
now have a logical reason for one to think of when he will
eat
this KORBAN at the time of its offering. The very THOUGHT
of
eating a korban outside its time frame implies that the
owner
does not want to SHARE his korban with others. In other
words, this person offering the korban is being selfish,
for
he wants to save the meat for himself.
Clearly, being selfish is a bad trait. But is it so
evil
that it deserves the punishment of KARET - to be totally
cut
off from the people of Israel?
A NECESSARY BALANCE
This law of PIGUL may contain an extremely important
'mussar' (moral message) concerning the necessary balance
between our relationship with God and our fellow man.
Recall that the Korban SHLAMIM is a voluntary
offering
where one wishes to express his closeness to God, to
re-affirm
his commitment to the covenant of HAR SINAI (see TSC shiur
on
Parshat Vayikra). If at the height of one's spiritual
experience, as he stands in front of God offering his
KORBAN
SHLAMIM, a selfish thought can still enter his mind - i.e.
he
does not want to share his korban with others - God
becomes
'disgusted' with this person, and the korban becomes
PIGUL. A
person who has yet to inculcate the basic trait of
sharing,
has no right to stand in front of the MIZBEIACH and offer
a
voluntary korban to God!
To support this understanding, note how the next
pasuk in
Parshat Kedoshim contains a law that stems from a similar
reason. The obligation of the farmer to leave over a part
of
his field for the poor ['pe'a', 'shichecha', and 'leket' /
see
19:9-10] teaches the owner not to be so selfish as to keep
all
of its produce for himself. Here we find yet another
mitzva
that requires the sharing of prosperity, and thus supports
our
interpretation of the underlying reason for the law of
pigul.
PIGUL & LO TISA
If 'sharing' is indeed the underlying reason for
PIGUL
and PE'A, then the parallel between Parshat Kedoshim and
the
Ten Commandments, as discussed above, would suggest that
these
laws should be in some manner related to the third
Commandment
of LO TISA - not to proclaim God's Name in vain. To
uncover
that connection, we must return to our study of the
meaning of
God's Name in Sefer Breishit, and its connection to the
laws
of the MIZBEIACH and hence to korbanot in general.
SHEM HASHEM & THE MIZBEIACH
Recall from Parshat Lech Lecha how Avraham Avinu,
immediately upon his arrival in Eretz Canaan, built a
MIZBEIACH and 'calls out in God's Name' in BET EL [lit.
the
HOUSE of God] (see Breishit 12:8 & 13:4). As we explained
in
our shiur on this topic, Avraham's MIZBEIACH served as a
vehicle enabling him to 'call out in God's Name', or as
Ramban
on 12:8 explained, teaching mankind concerning their need
to
recognize God and His Creation.
Later at Har Sinai we find a similar connection
between
the mizbeiach and 'shem Hashem' [God's Name]. Immediately
upon the completion of the Ten Commandments, God commands
Bnei
Yisrael:
"An earthen MIZBEIACH you shall make for Me... where
ever I
CALL OUT MY NAME I will come and bless you" (Shmot
20:21).
[Note that the psukim in Shmot 20:19-23 can also be
understood as parallel to the first three DIBROT, while
the
remaining DIBROT are parallel to the mitzvot which
continue
in Parshat Mishpatim (very similar to what happens in
Parshat Kedoshim). According to that parallel, the law
of
MIZBEIACH is clearly the parallel to LO TISA! (Read
20:22-
23 carefully to verify this.)]
As the above examples show, the concept of 'shem
Hashem'
relates directly to the MIZBEIACH. In fact, the bet ha-
mikdash itself is consistently referred to in Sefer
Devarim as
'ha-Makom asher yivchar Hashem leshaken SHMO sham' - the
place
that God will choose to allow His Name to dwell (see for
example Devarim 12:5-12, 16:1-17, and 26:1-2).
As the very purpose of the bet ha-mikdash and the
mizbeiach
is to properly publicize the Name of God, any law relating
to
the proper offering of a sacrifice could be considered as
parallel to LO TISA, especially the laws of pigul.
If so, then our parallel between the DIBROT and opening
psukim Parshat Kedoshim is complete, as pigul becomes the
parallel for Lo Tisa in the 'Ani Hashem Elokeichem'
section!
This parallel also follows the differentiation
between
the mitzvot bein adam la-Makom (first five) and the
mitzvot
bein adam le-chaveiro (last five). It should not surprise
us
now to find that the Torah's presentation of the of law of
PIGUL includes the phrase -'et kodesh HASHEM chillel' -
for he
has desecrated that what is holy to God (see 19:8).
As the primary concept of the Third Commandment is
not to
desecrate God's Name, then its parallel could include any
law
that may cause God's Name (or reputation) to become
tainted.
An individual who comes to the bet ha-mikdash to express
his
special closeness to God - by offering a korban shlamim,
yet
at the same time thinks selfishly about himself, causes
God's
Name to be desecrated.
SHNEI LUCHOT HA-BRIT
One could suggest that this may be the underlying
message
of the two sections of the Ten Commandments, [i.e the two
LUCHOT of BRIT SINAI]. The mitzvot bein adam la-Makom' of
the
first five DIBROT come 'part and parcel' with the mitzvot
bein
adam le-chaveiro of the last five DIBROT.
In fact, the law of pigul forms a meaningful transition
between these two sections, for it is a law relating to
both
man & God, and his fellow man. This necessary blend
between
one's worship of God and his respect and care for his
fellow
man, so typical of the other laws of Parshat Kedoshim,
should
be the most prominent character of the Jewish nation.
When Am Yisrael act in this manner, they become a
true AM
KADOSH, a holy nation that truly testifies that God is
KADOSH
and His Name is KADOSH. By doing so, they facilitate
bringing
'shem Hashem' God's Name (and hence His reputation) to
mankind.
shabbat shalom,
menachem
FOR FURTHER IYUN
A. Can you suggest a reason why ANI HASHEM ELOKEICHEM
relates
to the mitzvot bein adam la-Makom while ANI HASHEM relates
to
the mitzvot bein adam le-chaveiro (at least in the first
18
psukim)? [Hint: Which mitzvot are more universal, and
which
are more special for Am Yisrael?]
B. In Parshat Kedoshim, we find a pattern where there
appears
to be no or very little connection from one mitzva to the
next. Do you think that this is intentional?
If so, based on the above shiur, what is its
significance?
See Ibn Ezra in 19:3-18. Do you agree with all of
his
associations concerning the flow of the parsha?
**********************************************************
***
THE TANACH STUDY CENTER [http://www.tanach.org]
In Memory of Rabbi Abraham Leibtag
Shiurim in Chumash & Navi by Menachem Leibtag
**********************************************************
***
PARSHAT KEDOSHIM -shiur #2
THE HEADER / KOL ADAT YISRAEL
Does the name 'EDAH' imply something 'good' or
something
'bad'? Even though EDAH carries a negative connotation in
the
story of the spies in Parshat Shlach, in the opening pasuk
of
Parshat Kedoshim it seems to imply something very
positive.
In the following shiur we suggest a thematic
connection
between the word EDAH and the first half of Parshat
Kedoshim
(i.e. chapter 19).
INTRODUCTION
In contrast to most parshiot in Chumash which begin
with
the standard header:
"And God spoke to Moshe saying, speak to BNEI
YISRAEL..."
Parshat Kedoshim adds a short but important phrase:
"And God spoke to Moshe saying, speak to KOL ADAT Bnei
Yisrael... - to the entire congregation of Israel"
(19:1-2).
This special header indicates that there must be some
specific reason why this parshia was given to KOL ADAT
YISRAEL
-i.e. to the entire EDAH - congregation of Israel. [Note
that
ADAT is simply the 'smichut' form of EDAH.]
Rashi, quoting the Midrash in Torat Kohanim, explains
that specifically this parshia was given to the 'entire
congregation' because it includes most of the basic
principles
of the Torah ['rov gufei Torah tluyin bah']. [See also
Chizkuni (19:2) who quotes a similar Midrash Tanchuma.]
Even though Rashi explains why it was necessary for
Moshe
to relay these mitzvot in a special gathering, he does not
explain why specifically the word EDAH is used! In other
words, the Torah could have simply said: speak to KOL Bnei
Yisrael (ALL of Bnei Yisrael / see Devarim 1:1), or could
have
used the Hebrew word KAHAL instead of EDAH, which would
have
been a more precise way to describe a gathering.
Therefore, the Torah's choice of the word EDAH
suggests a
connection between the mitzvot of Parshat Kedoshim and the
word EDAH. To find that connection, we must consider its
etymology.
The Hebrew word EDAH stems from one of two possible
roots:
1) ayin.daled - which implies to AFFIRM or TESTIFY
[e.g. the word EID= a witness; EDAH= a female
witness]
2) yod.ayin.daled - which implies to APPOINT or to
DESIGNATE
The first root would imply that Am Yisrael, when
called
an EDAH, serve as sort of a WITNESS, while the second root
would imply that they have been APPOINTED for a certain
purpose. How would either or both explanations tie into
Parshat Kedoshim?
From the opening commandment of Parshat Kedoshim, one
could suggest an interesting interpretation:
"KEDOSHIM TIHIYU - You shall be holy, for I, the Lord
your
God, am holy..." (19:2).
By acting as a holy nation, Am Yisrael 'testifies' (to
itself and to other nations) that God exists, for He is
holy.
[See Sforno 19:2.]
Why is this testimony necessary?
Testimony is usually needed order to prove a fact.
Considering that God is transcendent, it is difficult for
man
to perceive His existence. Therefore, God commands ADAT
BNEI
YISRAEL to keep special mitzvot which help create a
society
which 'testifies' to God's existence. One could actually
combine both meanings and suggest that it is for this
reason
that God DESIGNATED Bnei Yisrael to become a nation.
KEDUSHA - FOR A PURPOSE
Even though this interpretation may not be 'simple
pshat', it blends nicely with Sefer Vayikra's theme of
KEDUSHA
in the three realms of MAKOM, ZMAN, & ADAM, which we
developed
in our shiur on Acharei Mot.
a) KEDUSHAT HA-MISHKAN ['kedushat makom'], we explained,
implies that God separates a special place and infuse it
with
an intense level of holiness IN ORDER that it affect and
thus
elevate the level of the area which surrounds it.
b) In a similar manner, God separated SHABBAT ['kedushat
zman'], infusing it with a intense level of holiness, IN
ORDER
to elevate the spiritual level of the entire week.
c) So too - KEDUSHAT AM YISRAEL ['kedushat adam']. God
separates a special nation, infusing it with an intense
level
of holiness, IN ORDER to elevate the spiritual level of
all
nations. God 'designates' Am Yisrael to follow the
mitzvot of
KEDOSHIM TIHIYU to fulfill this purpose, and in this
manner we
'testify' before all nations that God exists.
This concept, which may only be alluded to here in
Parshat Kedoshim, is stated more directly in Sefer Devarim
as
Bnei Yisrael prepare to enter the Promised Land:
"See, I have taught you CHUKIM & MISHPATIM [compare
Vayikra
18:3-5!] for you to keep in the land which you are about
to
conquer. Observe them faithfully, for that will be
PROOF of
you wisdom IN THE EYES OF THE NATIONS who upon hearing
all
these laws will say:
Surely, that great nation is a wise people, for what
great
nation is there that is so CLOSE TO GOD... or what great
nation has such perfect CHUKIM & MISHPATIM as the TORAH
that
I set before you on this day..." (Devarim 4:5-8).
TWO OTHER PARSHIOT
In addition to Parshat Kedoshim, there are two
earlier
parshiot of mitzvot which are directed specifically to
ADAT
BNEI YISRAEL.
1) Parshat Ha-Chodesh - Shmot 12:1-20 (see 12:3) which
discusses MAKKAT BECHOROT & KORBAN PESACH.
2) Parshat Vayakhel - the commandment to build the
MISHKAN.
One could explain the Torah's use of the phrase ADAT
BNEI
YISRAEL in these two parshiot in a similar manner.
(1) Parshat Ha-Chodesh (as we all know) is God's very
FIRST
commandment to Bnei Yisrael (see Rashi Breishit 1:1). The
laws of Korban Pesach that are detailed in that parshia
serve
a double purpose. For Am Yisrael to:
a) recognize God's hand in their salvation from MAKKAT
BECHOROT [which caused the Egyptians to finally
recognize
God. [See Shmot 11:1-10.]
b) AFFIRM their covenantal commitment to BRIT BEIN
H-'BTARIM
(i.e. Brit Avot). [See shiur on Parshat Va'era].
(2) Parshat Vayakhel describes the commandment to build
the
MISHKAN which itself serves as a symbol and testimony of
God's
presence. [Recall that at the focal point of the Mishkan
lie
the LUCHOT ha-EIDUT / see Shmot 25:16,21-22.]
One could even suggest that these three parshiot
which
are given to ADAT Bnei Yisrael reflect once again the
three
realms of KEDUSHA:
Parshat ha-Chodesh - kedushat ZMAN
Parshat Vayakhel - kedushat MAKOM
Parshat Kedoshim - kedushat ADAM
==========
FOR FURTHER IYUN
1. Note in the first Rashi on "daber el kol ADAT Bnei
Yisrael" that Rashi states: "melamed she-ne'emar
be-HAKHEL".
How does the parallel to Shmot 35:1 help us better
understand
this Rashi?
2. In Sefer Bamidbar (see 14:26-27 and its context), Bnei
Yisrael sin at chet ha-meraglim. Those sinners are
referred to
as an EDAH RA'A - a wicked (or bad) EDAH?
Can our explanation of 'witness' still apply in this
case?
3. Note that Korach's splinter group is also called an
EDAH,
and in Korach's original complaint we find the same word -
"ki KOL ha-
EDAH kulam KDOSHIM u-vetocham HASHEM..." (see Bamidbar
16:3).
Can you relate this complaint of Korach to this week's
shiur
and the Torah's use of the word EDAH?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: kdosh1.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 37295 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.atlchai.org/pipermail/par-lite/attachments/20100421/790fd6b0/attachment-0002.pdf
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: kdosh2.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 23689 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.atlchai.org/pipermail/par-lite/attachments/20100421/790fd6b0/attachment-0003.pdf
More information about the Par-lite
mailing list