[Par-reg.w] Korach - questions for self study
Menachem Leibtag
tsc at bezeqint.net
Sun Jun 15 08:21:02 EDT 2014
*********************************************
****************
THE TANACH STUDY CENTER
[http://www.tanach.org]
In Memory of Rabbi Abraham Leibtag
Shiurim in Chumash & Navi by Menachem
Leibtag
*********************************************
****************
PARSHAT KORACH
PART I - QUESTIONS FOR THE 'SHABBOS TABLE'
1. Recall how Moshe Rabeinu asks God to
make a "b'riyah" - a
'creation' - to prove to the people that he
was only following
God's direct orders (rather than making his
own decisions /
see Bamidbar 16:30). In relation to this
word "beriyah":
a. Where is the first time (and last
time) in Chumash
that the word "b'riyah" [shoresh
bet.reish.aleph] is
mentioned?
b. Who (exclusively) can perform an act
of "beriyah"?
c. Based on these answers, how (and why)
does
specifically an act of "b'riyah" [as opposed
to any other type
of miracle] prove to the people that Moshe's
& Aharon's
leadership was indeed a divine decision?
d. Relate your answer to Pirkei Avot 5:9
concerning the
ten things that were created on the 6th day
"bein ha'shmashot"
(note that the list includes "pi-ha'aretz"
from the Korach
story).
2. In 16:22, Moshe asks a very difficult
question: Should one
man's sin cause punishment for an entire
group [="eydah"]?
a. According to your understanding of
this pasuk, does
'one man' refer solely to Korach, and "eydah"
to the 250 men?
- or does 'one man' refer to the Korach & the
250 men, and the
"eydah" to the entire group that had gathered
around? Support
your answer, based on the use of the word
"eydah" in earlier
and/or later psukim (i.e. between 16:18 thru
16:25).
b. Does Hashem answer Moshe's question?
If so, what is that answer?
If not, then explain why not?
In other words, relate your answer
to the next set
of events described in 16:23-28.
c. How does your answer to part (a)
affect your answer to
part (b)? [Be sure to relate to 16:23-26.]
d. If an entire group were to punished
because of the
acts of an individual, would you expect that
the group might
be somehow responsible for the behavior of
that individual?
[Explain why.]
3. In this week's Haftara, we read about the
coronation of
King Shaul by Shmuel (I Sam. Chapter 12). The
most obvious
connection to this week's Parsha is 12:3 ("et
shor mi
lakachti..."/ compare 16:15). What other
thematic
similarities exist between Shmuel and Moshe &
Aharon?
In what manner is Shmuel similar to
Korach as well?
[Relate the type of reform that Shmuel
performs during his
life, in contrast to the complaints raised by
Korach.]
In your answer, relate to actions of
Eli's sons (see
Shmuel chapter 3) and Shmuel's function as
the political
leader ("shofet") and his involvement in the
establishment of
the monarchy.
Relate also to Shmuel's genealogy (who
was his great
great grandfather?!), as can be deduced from
Sefer Divrei
Ha'yamim I.6:3-13)
See also Shmuel 3:19-20, 7:3-17.
In what manner does Shmuel, who is
a Levi, act like
a Kohen? (Relate to Shmuel 3:1-3, 13:8-12.)
How is this similar to Korach?
4. In earlier TSC shiurim (on Yom Kippur and
Parshat Tzaveh),
we discussed the special nature of the KTORET
and its function
as a protection from the consequences of
"hitgalut shchina".
Recall also the events that led to the death
of Nadav & Avihu.
Based on the conclusions of those shiurim,
answer the
following questions:
a. Why do you think Moshe suggests that
the 250 men offer
specifically KTORET in order to prove if they
are chosen (see
16:5-7)? Do you think that this 'test' is
Moshe's idea or
God's? [See Ramban on 16:5 (towards the
end).]
Relate your answer to the nation's
ensuing accusation
that Moshe has caused the death of God's
people (see 17:6-15)?
b. Do you think that when Moshe first
suggested this
test, that he was aware of the potential
outcome that all 250
men would be consumed by fire? In what other
manner could
this test have convinced these 250 men to
remove themselves
from Korach's revolt?
c. In your opinion, why is specifically
the "ktoret" used
to SAVE the people from their ensuing
punishment, as described
in 17:11-15?
========
PART II QUESTIONS for PREPARATION for this
week's shiur
1. To the best of your recollection (i.e.
before studying this
week's Parsha), what exactly was Korach's
complaint? Did he
have only one complaint, or many? [If so,
what were they?]
To help you answer (or realize the
difficulty in) this
question, let's say Korach could have had
whatever he wanted -
precisely what is it that he wanted?
Finally (once again to the best of your
recollection),
how was Korach punished - i.e. did he die,
and if so, how?
2. Next, carefully study the story that
transpires in 16:1-35,
while paying attention to the following
questions. [As you
study these psukim, see if you need to revise
any of your
answers to the above question!]
Attempt to identify more precisely what
Korach was
complaining about, what he wanted, and the
logic behind his
protest. Be sure to note as well who else
complains, and what
their complaints are about.
As you summarize the various complaints
that are raised
against Moshe & Aharon, note if everyone
raises them jointly,
or can you identify different groups that
complain about
different topics.
Would you consider any of these
complaints (at least
partially) justified? If so, can you explain
why they are not
accepted?
3. In your opinion, what precisely was the
purpose of the
"ketoret" test (as described in 17:5-7)?
Was this test Moshe's idea, or did God
tell him to
suggest it? [Attempt to base your answer on
psukim.]
What possible results could have the
'ketoret test'
returned? Was it clear to everyone
participating that if you
'lost' you would be killed? Can you explain
why so many
people (i.e. 250) were willing to participate
in this test?
Was there only supposed to be 'one winner' in
this 'contest',
or could have God accepted the offerings of
more than one
participant? If so, what would that indicate
(or prove)?
4. As you study 16:7-11, note how Moshe adds
an additional
rebuke to "bnei Levi". Can you explain the
logic of this
additional complaint, and why it is directed
specifically to
the Levites? Relate you answer to the
purpose of this
'ketoret test' and to Korach's opening
complaint of "ki kol
ha'eyda kolam kedoshim". Could you say that
Moshe claims that
there is something 'hypocritical' about their
new request to
'serve as priests'? If so, explain how and
why.
5. Study 16:12-15 carefully, and be sure that
you can follow
the logic of everyone's statements. Attempt
to explain the
connection between Korach and Datan & Aviram.
In your
opinion, do they share the same complaint as
Korach had
mentioned earlier, or does their complaint
focus on a
different issue?
In your answer, relate to how and why
Moshe summons them,
and how and why they refuse that summons.
Was Moshe inviting
them to participate in the "ketoret" test?
If so, why is
angered by their refusal to participate? If
not, why were
they summoned? [Relate to the reason they
send for not
coming!]
Relate also to Moshe's special prayer to
God in light of
their rejection of his summons. What
"mincha" is Moshe
referring to?
6. Review now the entire chapter (16:1-35)
once again; but
this time around pay careful attention to
WHERE (and when)
each conversation and/or event takes place.
Does the narrative seem to be
continuous, or do you find
certain 'jumps' within it? If so, explain
where.
In other words, are there certain
details in the story
that appear to be missing? If so, where?
7. In case you didn't notice, note how this
chapter discusses
events that take place in TWO different
locations. Where are
these two locations, and what is taking place
at each one?
As you review these psukim, try to
figure out precisely
WHERE Korach is, especially when the
punishment comes.
8. Review 16:24, and explain what (and where)
MISHKAN Korach
Datan v'Aviram is! Why do you think that it
is referred to as
a 'mishkan', and what was taking place there?
9. At the end of this story, do we find one
punishment or
two? If there are two, which group (at which
location)
receives which punishment? Relate your answer
to the above
questions.
Based on your answer, who (or to which
group) is Moshe
Rabeinu referring to in 16:20-22 when he
asks, "should one man
sin and the entire EYDAH be punished?"
Relate both to the psukim that preceded
this question
(16:16-19) and those that follow it
(16:23-27).
10. If there are indeed two groups and two
complaints and two
punishments [hope you figured this out by
now], which of these
two groups does Korach lead?
Based on your answer, try to better
understand the
opening pasuk of the parsha "va'yikach
Korach..." i.e WHAT did
Korach TAKE?!
11. Based on your study thus far, which
specific punishment
did Korach receive? Can you prove that he was
indeed punished?
[Quote a pasuk to support your answer.]
Relate your answer to Bamidbar 26:9-10!
See also Ibn Ezra on 16:35!
12. Considering that God has just created a
"beriyah" to bury
Korach & his followers, why do you think that
the people
accuse Moshe & Aharon for causing the death
of "AM HASHEM"
(see 17:6)? Wasn't this miracle enough to
prove to the people
that it was God's doing and not Moshe's? [How
is the test of
the "matot" (17:16-24) any more convincing?]
In this new complaint of the people, who
are the "am
Hashem" that Bnei Yisrael refer to, and which
specific death
to they claim that Moshe caused? [Relate the
two different
punishments discussed in the above
questions.]
Use this distinction to help answer this
question?
PART III - PARSHANUT
1. There are at least four different opinions
in the Rishonim
that explain WHAT Korach TOOK (see 16:1).
First of all, try to
explain WHY there are so many different
opinions.
Then, see Rashi & Ramban. On what
specific point do they
argue? [Be sure to see the entire Ramban
(it's long!).]
Next, see Ibn Ezra (second "dibur
ha'matchil"), Rashbam
and Chizkuni. In what manner is their
approach to this
question totally different than the approach
taken by Rashi &
Ramban.
[What is the different basic assumption taken
by each
parshan?]
See now Seforno. Is his approach more
similar to that of
Ibn Ezra or to that of Rashi/Ramban? Explain
why.
See also Rasa"g (in Torat Chayim) [he
explains that
"va'yikach" should be understood as
"va'yigash" - i.e. and he
came near.] In what manner is this pirush
totally different
than all of the other pirushim mentioned
above?
Finally, see also the opinion of Rebbi
Yona Ibn Janach
(the final opinion quoted by Ibn Ezra in his
pirush). What
phrase does he 'add' to this pasuk? To which
earlier
interpretation is his pirush most similar?
2. Ibn Ezra (in his opening pirush / 16:1)
claims that the
entire story of Korach took place BEFORE chet
ha'meraglim,
i.e. while Bnei Yisrael were still encamped
at Har Sinai!!
What problems in "pshat" lead Ibn Ezra
to this
conclusion?
See Ramban's rebuttal of this opinion
(at the end of his
pirush to 16:1). Note how Ramban explains his
position in
regard to the topic of "ein mukdam u'muchar"!
What problems in "pshat" does Ramban
employ to support
his opinion?
On what points does he actually agree
with Ibn Ezra?
How does he resolve this within his own
interpretation?
3. In 16:15, Moshe pleads that God not accept
'their MINCHA';
Read this pasuk carefully, noting its
context.
Whose MINCHA is Moshe referring to
[Datan v'Aviram's
or Korach's]?
WHAT "mincha" is he referring to? [Is
it a korban? If
so, which one and who and where is it being
offered?]
Now, see Rashi. Note how he offers both
"pshat" &
"drash".
[Use this to explain how Rashi
distinguishes between
pshat & drash.]
What is difficult with Rashi's
explanation of pshat?
Why do you think he brings down a
drash as well?
Now see Ramban. How and why does he
argue with Rashi?
Relate Ramban's rebuttal to the
questions in Part II
above (i.e. to this week's shiur).
Note as well that Ramban also
claims that his pirush
is the basic "pshat". In your opinion, which
pirush is closest
to pshat - Rashi's or Ramban's? [or neither?]
Next see Ibn Ezra.
In what manner is Ibn Ezra's pirush
totally
different than Rashi & Ramban? Would you
consider this pirush
"pshat"? Explain why yes or no.
[Be sure to relate to how each
parshan explains
the second clause of this pasuk (16:15).]
Finally, see Seforno.
To which of the above pirushim is
his pirush most
similar? Would you consider Seforno's pirush
as "pshat"? In
what way does he differ from Ibn Ezra?
PART IV - Questions for shiur on the Haftara
I Shmuel chapters 11->12
1. To the best of your recollection, is
Shmuel in favor of
Bnei Yisrael appointing a king, or against?
In your opinion, is there any positive
value in Am
Yisrael having a king? If so, what is
positive about it?
What is the danger in having a king?
2. Attempt to define the differences between
"melech" (king)
and a "shofet" (judge).
[Relate to type of government, transfer
of power after
death, ability to levy taxes and conscript
soldiers, setting
national policies, etc.
Bring examples from Sefer Shoftim and
from Shmuel.]
3. In what manner can (or does) "malchut
adam" - a kingship of
man - conflict with the concept of "malchut
shamayim" - the
kingship of heaven (i.e. God)?
[Relate to the words of Gideon in
Shoftim 8:23]
4. See Devarim 17:14-20 in relation the
mitzvah to appoint a
king. [If you have time, see the various
commentaries there.
Is it a mitzvah to appoint a king?
[See TSC shiur on Parshat
Re'ay.]
See also Rambam Hilchot Melachim chapter
1 Halacha 1.
If it is a mitzvah, why has it taken so
long to fulfill
the mitzvah? Why does Shmuel seem to be
against it?
See also Mesechet Sanhedrin 29:2 (from
the Mishnah).
[If a melech is something negative,
then what type
of government is ideal?]
[Now we can begin our study of the Haftara]
5. Skim chapters 7->13 in Sefer Shmuel (I),
and note why and
how chapters 8->12 form a separate unit?
[i.e. note how chapter 7 completes the
topic of Shmuel as
the leader, and how chapter 13 begins the
topic of Shaul's
kingdom.]
What is the topic of this unit (chapters
8->12)? How does
its opening chapter relate to its closing
chapter?
How do the chapters in between flow from
one to the next?
6. Why did Bnei Yisrael ask for a king
specifically at this
time?
In your opinion, was there more than one
group among the
people?
Why was Shmuel angry; and why did Hashem
tell him to
agree?'
7. Why are the people so worried about war
at this time?
What is their alternative if they do not
appoint a king?
Why do they ask Shmuel for a king, are they
not capable of
appointing a king by themselves?
8. From the story in chapter 9, does Shaul
seem to be a
'natural leader'? How is his leadership
character enhanced in
Chapter 10?
What is the reaction of the people after
he is anointed
king at Mitzpeh? Are there two groups?
Explain each.
9. How is Shaul's leadership character
enhanced in Chapter
11?
Why does Shmuel re-anoint Shaul after
the battle of
Yavesh Gilad?
Why is the reaction of the people more
favorable this
time?
10. Note how chapter 12 answers most all the
questions raised
regarding the problems of appointing a king
in Chapter 8?
To do so, note the following parallels:
Chapter 12 Chapter 8
========== ==========
Compare: Psukim 3-5 to Psukim 11-18
6-12 19-20
13-15 7-9
11. Note 12:3. In your opinion, is Shmuel
'showing off' or is
he trying to set an example for Shaul?
[Explain.]
Why is there an increased fear of
corruption with the
melucha (kingship)? Relate this to the
contrasting parallel
between Shmuel and Korach. [Compare with
Bamidbar 16:15.]
12. What is the main point Shmuel is making
in 12:6-15? How
does this relate to the theme of Sefer
Shoftim? [Who wrote
Sefer Shoftim (and for what purpose)?
13. Shmuel causes it to rain during the wheat
harvest (late
spring) as a sign of God's anger to their
request for a king.
Is rain good or bad? At what time of the
year?
How can this reflect the potential good
(or bad) of
appointing a king?
14. In 12:19 the people finally regret asking
for a king. If
Shmuel is truly against Bnei Yisrael having a
king, why does
he insist they now keep their king instead?
Does 12:22 help explain that reason?
How?
Why does Hashem want a melech?
Under what condition
will the kingdom be successful?
b'hatzlacha,
menachem
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.atlchai.org/pipermail/par-reg.w/attachments/20140615/723093c7/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: korachq.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 34672 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.atlchai.org/pipermail/par-reg.w/attachments/20140615/723093c7/attachment-0001.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: korachq.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 34666 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.atlchai.org/pipermail/par-reg.w/attachments/20140615/723093c7/attachment-0001.doc>
More information about the Par-reg.w
mailing list