[Par-reg] Vayishlach - Questoins for self study
Menachem Leibtag
tsc at bezeqint.net
Mon Nov 19 11:14:38 EST 2007
********************************************************
*****
THE TANACH STUDY CENTER [http://www.tanach.org]
In Memory of Rabbi Abraham Leibtag
Shiurim in Chumash & Navi by Menachem Leibtag
********************************************************
*****
PARSHAT VA'YISHLACH
PART I - QUESTIONS FOR THE 'SHABBOS TABLE'
'TRICKERY' IN YAAKOV AVINU'S LIFE
1. Review the various stories about Yaakov Avinu in
Parshiot
Toldot and Va'yetze, noting almost each one involves
some sort
of "trickery". [Note when Yaakov uses trickery, and
when
trickery is used against Yaakov.]
a) Can you discern a pattern?
b) In each of these stories, can the trickery be
justified?
c) In your opinion, is Yaakov Avinu later
'punished' for
this trickery? If so, when and how?
d) In your opinion, [if he indeed is later punished
for
this trickery] does this necessarily imply that Yaakov
was
'wrong' in his actions? Explain!
2. Next, review the beginning of Parshat Vayishlach
(32:4-
32:25), noting how Yaakov prepares for his confrontation
with
Esav by telling his messengers not only to present a
gift, but
also to inform Esav that he [Yaakov] will be coming
'momentarily'. [To verify this, carefully review
32:18-22!]
Try to explain as well why Yaakov finds it
necessary to
leave 'gaps' between each flock that he sends.
In your opinion, does Yaakov truly plan to confront
Esav,
or is his plan a 'stall' to allow him extra time to
'run-
away'. Base your answer on the other actions that
Yaakov
takes, as well as to the fears that he expresses in his
prayer
(to which God does not seem to provide an immediate
reply)!
In your opinion, is Yaakov using trickery (once
again) in
an attempt to run away from his brother, or does he
truly plan
to confront him?
Then, review 32:24 (i.e. when Yaakov crosses the
Yakok
stream). In your opinion, is Yaakov crossing that
stream to
meet Esav or to run away from him? Now, see Rashbam on
32:23!
[See other commentators as well (who disagree).]
3. Based on your answer to the above question, attempt
to
explain the deeper meaning of Yaakov's struggle with the
"malach" (see 32:24-30), i.e. why does God send someone
to
wrestle with him. In you answer, relate as well to the
blessing that Yaakov receives in the aftermath of that
struggle.
Who does Yaakov meet immediately after this
struggle is
over, and what does he do (see 33:1-3)? Relate this
fact to
your answer to the above questions!
Based on the above questions, suggest a possible
meaning
for Yaakov's name change to Yisrael in the aftermath of
this
incident.
THE SHOWDOWN WITH ESAV
4. In your opinion, when Esav first left to meet Yaakov
(see
32:6), was his original intention to fight against
Yaakov, or
did he just want to greet him? In your answer, relate to
33:1-17, especially 33:4. Relate also to 27:41-45.
Now see Rashi on 33:4 and then Ibn Ezra! [Note
Seforno
and Radak as well on 33:4.] Can you explain the reason
for
these different approaches to this 'open question'?
5. In your opinion, was it proper for Yaakov to bow
down
seven times in front of Esav? Was he simply trying to
appease
Esav, or was this an attempt to indicate something more
significant?
Relate to 27:28-29, and see Ramban on 32:4 (and
Radak).
[See also Rashbam on 32:29 and Chizkuni on
32:5.]
Finally, see Maharam on 32:5 (in Torat Chaim
edition).
['Right wingers' will probably enjoy this commentary (at
least
more than Ramban's).]
PART II - QUESTIONS FOR PREPARATION (for weekly shiur)
For Shiur #1 - FROM YAAKOV TO YISRAEL
[Note: It would be helpful to answer the above
'Questions
for the shabbos table' as additional preparation for
this
shiur.]
1. Recall how Parshat Va'yetze concluded with Yaakov
meeting
the "maalachei Elokim" [angels of God] - see 32:1-3. In
your
opinion, did this have any affect on his decision to
send
messengers to meet Esav (see 32:4-5).
In your answer, relate to the angels that Yaakov
first
saw in Bet El before leaving Eretz Canaan, and God's
promise
to him at that time (see 28:12-15). Relate as well to
why
Yaakov had to run away in the first place, and for how
long
his mother told him that he should stay away for (see
27:41-
45).
In your opinion, does Yaakov expect to find that
Esav
still wants to kill him, or does he think that Esav is
no
longer so angry?
2. Next, review 32:9-12 - i.e. Yaakov's prayer that God
save
him from Esav - noting how he recalls several earlier
promises
that God had made. How does this prayer relate to his
original
assumption regarding Esav and the report he received
from his
messengers that Esav is approaching with four hundred
men?
Try to find the 'sources' (in Chumash) for what
Yaakov
mentions in 32:9 and 32:12. Can you explain why Yaakov
chose
to relate to specifically these promises in his prayer?
(Be
sure to relate to 22:15-18.)
3. Does God answer Yaakov's prayer? If so, when; and
in what
manner?
It appears that God did not provide Yaakov with an
immediate answer to this prayer. In your opinion, did
this
affect (in any manner) Yaakov's plan for confronting (or
running away) from Esav? If so, explain how.
4. Based on everything that Yaakov does between 32:4 and
32:23, how does Yaakov plan to save his family?
Note how the next event is his struggle in
32:24-30. In
your opinion, was this confrontation simply
'incidental', or
did God send this person? If the latter, can you
suggest a
reason why? Relate your reason to the above questions.
5. At the end of this struggle, Yaakov asks for a
blessing,
and the angel changes his name from Yaakov to Yisrael
(see
32:28). Attempt to relate this name change to all the
previous events. Explain as well why this should be
considered a 'blessing'!
6. In what manner is Yaakov's name change to Yisrael
different
than Avram's name change to AvraHam? [Be sure to note
at
least two distinctions.]
Based on your answer, why do you think that Yaakov
continues to be called Yaakov, even after this name
change?
Relate you answer to the above questions.
In your opinion, what does each name represent?
See the commentaries of Ibn Ezra, Rashbam, and
Chizkuni
on 35:10, noting how they relate to this question.
7. Review 35:9-16, noting how we find once again that
Yaakov's
name is changed to Yisrael. In your opinion, does the
story
in 25:9-16 CONTRADICT the story in 32:27-29? Or, is this
simply a REPETITION, or possibly a CONFIRMATION, or
maybe an
ADDITION? Explain.
Next, review 28:3-4, i.e. Yitzchak's blessing to
Yaakov
before he first left Eretz Canaan, noting the purpose of
that
blessing as well as God's Name [i.e. Elokim] that
Yitzchak
invokes at that time. In what manner is that blessing
similar to the blessing that Yaakov receives from God at
this
time? Can you explain why?
8. If you follow the commentaries of Ramban and Seforno
in
chapter 32, you'll notice how they find numerous
parallels
between these events in Yaakov's life and the history of
Am
Yisrael. Can you explain what leads them to this
conclusion?
For Shiur #2 - WHEN DOES YAAKOV RETURN TO BET EL?
1. In your opinion, how much time elapses between the
events
recorded in 32:27-29, and those recorded in 35:9-15? [Or
at
least what events took place in the interim?] How would
this
affect your understanding of the connection between
these two
events?
2. Recall that Yaakov had made a "neder" before his
departure
to Padan Aram (see 28:18-22).
Based on that promise, what would you expect Yaakov
to do
immediately upon his return to Eretz Canaan?
Does he do fulfill that promise? If so, when, and
why
then? If not, can you explain why he doesn't?
3. Review 30:25, 31:1-3, 31:13, 31:18. Based on those
psukim,
would you expect Yaakov to return immediately upon his
arrival
to his father and/or to Bet-El?
Can you explain why he doesn't?
4. Make a list of all of the events that take place in
Parshat
Va'yishlach. As you do so, make special note of its
division
into 'parshiot'. Attempt to determine the amount of
time that
elapses from one event to the next. In your opinion,
does the
progression of these events make sense?
5. Based on 31:41, 29:20-32, and 31:23, approximately
how old
are Yaakov's children when he first returns to Eretz
Canaan?
How old is Dina (maximum)? How old are Levi & Shimon?
When you read the story about Dina and Shchem in
chapter
34, how old do Dina, Shimon & Levi seem to be during
this
incident? Based on the above, attempt to reach a
conclusion
concerning how many years elapsed between Yaakov's
arrival at
Shchem and the incident with Dina?
6. In your opinion, does it make sense that until that
time
he had never yet gone to visit his father, or to fulfill
his
"neder" at Bet-el? If he did, then why does the text
not
indicate so? If he had not, can you explain why he
didn't?
7. Read 35:1-8 carefully, noting how it forms its own
"parshia" (and hence it is separate from 35:9-22).
What is the thematic connection between 35:1-8 and
the
story of 'Dina & Shchem' in chapter 34? Could it be
considered
part of the same story?
Note carefully why God instructs Yaakov to go to
Bet-el
in 35:1-3, i.e. for what purpose. Is there a precedent
for
this purpose at this site of Bet El? Does this relate
in any
manner to Yaakov's "neder" in 28:15-22?
Review once again 35:1-8, noting the "mizbayach"
that
Yaakov builds and its purpose. Does this relate in any
manner
to his "neder"? If so, explain how; if not explain why
it
doesn't - and why he does build this mizbayach.
8. Now read 35:9-22 carefully. Does it make sense that
this
story takes place immediately afterward (i.e. after
35:1-8),
or could one entertain the possibility that it took
place much
earlier?
In answer, relate to the textual parallels between
35:9
and 33:18 -"b'vo'oh m'Padan Aram...". If so, what
problems
raised above (regarding the story of Dina in Shchem)
would be
solved?
If this 'parshia' indeed did take place earlier,
can you
explain why the Torah records these events not according
to
their chronological sequence. In your answer, relate to
strange wording in 35:22 and its thematic connection to
35:23.
9. Note that 36:1 begins a new unit of "toladot" (Toldot
Esav).
Where did the last unit of "toldot" begin? (See
25:19.)
Where does it end? (Relate to 35:23-29.)
How is the conclusion of this unit of "toldot"
different
than the conclusions of the earlier units of "toldot" in
Sefer
Breishit (i.e. how many sons are 'chosen' and who is
'rejected')?
Explain why this observation is significant to the
overall theme of Sefer Breishit (of "bechira")?
Why may we have thought otherwise (i.e. that not
ALL of
Yaakov's children would be chosen)?
PART III - PARSHANUT
Shalem, Shalom, Shchem
1. Read 33:18 "va'yavo Yaakov SHALEM ir Shchem..."
a) In your opinion is "SHALEM" the NAME of the city
at
which Ya'akov arrived, or is it an ADJECTIVE describing
HOW
Yaakov arrived? (In your answer, be sure to relate to
both
Breishit 14:18 and 28:21!)
b) If "SHALEM" is the name of a city, then what is
"SHCHEM" the name of?
c) If "SHALEM" implies that he "arrived safely",
would
this be proper Hebrew? Based on the context of this
pasuk, in
your opinion which explanation makes the most sense?
2. Now, see how the various commentators approach this
enigmatic pasuk.
a) First, see Rashi and Ibn Ezra. In your opinion,
which
approach is "pshat", and which is "drash"?
b) Next, see Ramban, who quotes Rashi and Ibn Ezra,
and
argues with both of them. In what general manner is his
pirush similar to theirs?
c) Why do you think Ramban argues with Rashi & Ibn
Ezra?
Is his approach closer to "pshat"?
d) Now, see Seforno. How is his explanation
different
from all the above? In your opinion, is this closer to
pshat?
e) Next, see Rashbam. How is his pirush totally
different? (Why is Rashbam so adamant that his pirush
is the
ONLY 'real' pshat? Do you agree?)
f) Finally see Chizkuni. Does he agree totally with
Rashbam? What other problem does Chizkuni deal with?
[Note
how he proves that this cannot be the same city of
SHALEM as
in 14:18!]
3. In your opinion, why did Esav originally move from
Eretz
Canaan to Har Seir? [See 32:3, 33:14-17]
Now, see 36:5-9!! [Compare also with 13:5-15!]
Now, see Rashi, Rashbam, Ramban, Seforno, Radak &
Chizkuni!
How does each "parshan" solve this problem.
According to each, WHEN did 36:6-8 take place?
Be sure to see Ramban inside. [It is a classic
example of his magnificent approach to parshanut.]
4. Review 35:22, noting how the pasuk (and the story)
end
abruptly with: "va'yishma Yisrael". In your opinion,
what does
this phrase imply, i.e. what did Yaakov 'hear', or what
did he
do?
No matter what your answer is, why do you think
that this
pasuk is so ambiguous?
First see Rashbam (35:22) on this phrase. Note how
he
relates this pasuk to what is later written in 49:4. Can
you
explain why? Next, see Seforno. How is his pirush
different
than Rashbam? Note as well how it is similar, in regard
to the
fact that this phrase can only be understood in light of
another pasuk in Chumash.
Finally see Radak. Note how radical his approach
is! Note
how he relates in his pirush to Yaakov's "neder" in
28:21! Can
you explain why? In your opinion, is Radak's
interpretation
based on that pasuk, or does that pasuk simply provide
support?
MAASE AVOT SIMAN LA'BANIM
1. In his introduction to the Parasha (before 32:4) -
Ramban
explains how these events relate to Jewish history. As
your
study Ramban on chapter 32, note how he follows this
approach.
According to this Ramban, can (or should) we apply
these
events to our decisions in later generations concerning
how to
react to provocations against the Jewish people?
If so, are the answers 'clear-cut'; or do these
stories
help us appreciate the events after they take place?
As you study other commentators on chapter 32, note
how
they also find parallels between these events and other
events
in Jewish history. In what manner are their conclusions
similar to Ramban's and in what manner are they
different?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: vayishq.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 29573 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.atlchai.org/pipermail/par-reg/attachments/20071119/7967b01b/attachment-0001.pdf
More information about the Par-reg
mailing list