[Par-reg] Bhaalotcha - questions for self study
Menachem Leibtag
tsc at bezeqint.net
Wed Jun 11 11:47:51 EDT 2008
********************************************************
*****
THE TANACH STUDY CENTER [http://www.tanach.org]
In Memory of Rabbi Abraham Leibtag
Shiurim in Chumash & Navi by Menachem Leibtag
********************************************************
*****
PARSHAT BEHA'ALOTCHA
PART I - QUESTIONS FOR THE 'SHABBOS TABLE'
LIGHTING THE MENORA
1. Most probably, you have read the opening pasuk of
Parshat
Beha'alotcha many times, and it is often translated as
follows:
"...when you go up to light the menora..." (see 8:2).
Do you agree with this translation? Is this an
exact
translation of the Hebrew?
If not, what would be a more precise translation?
[ Be
sure that you understand the meaning of the word 'ner'.]
Now, read Shmot 25:31-38, especially 25:36-37.
What is
the precise definition of 'neirot' according to these
psukim?
See Rashi on 25:37!
Relate this to Bamidbar 8:4, and its description of
the
menora as 'miksha' [made from one piece of gold]. In
your
opinion, are the neirot [of the menora] part of this
miksha,
or are they separate from it? [In other words, are the
neirot
permanently connected to the menora, or are they
removable?
If they were removable, can you explain why?
From a technical standpoint, how did the kohen
light the
menora each day? [i.e. how did he set up the wicks and
oil in
the candles? What did the candle look like? etc.]
See also Ibn Ezra & Chizkuni on Rashi 25:37.
Based on these questions, how would you now
interpret
8:2?
A CHANGE IN ATTITUDE?
2. In chapter 11, as Bnei Yisrael begin their journey
from
Har Sinai, Moshe Rabbeinu is very angered by the
people's
behavior. Note Moshe's complaint to God in 11:10-15,
especially 11:11!
How is this both parallel and different to Moshe's
petitions to God in Sefer Shmot, based on Shmot 5:22,
32:30-
32, and 33:16?
Can you explain the reason for his 'change' in
attitude?
Relate to Bamidbar 11:4-6, while noting
Breishit3:6.
In what manner is the nature of Bnei Yisrael's sin
in
this incident worse than their sin at 'chet ha-egel',
and why
would this affect Moshe Rabbeinu's reaction?
What is God's response to Moshe's complaint in
Bamidbar
11:10-15, and how does this response relate to his
complaint?
See 11:16-17. Relate this to the above parallel.
Is Moshe Rabbeinu's reaction to this incident
similar to
his reaction to the other complaints that will later
arise in
Sefer Bamidbar? Explain what is similar and what is
different.
[Relate to Moshe's reaction to the incidents at
'chet ha-
meraglim', Korach's rebellion, and 'mei meriva'.]
How do the above questions relate to the more
general
topic of 'leadership' in Sefer Bamidbar?
A LEVITE FOR EVERY 'BECHOR'
3. In what manner is the special dedication ceremony
for the
levi'im (as described in Bamidbar 8:5-14) similar to the
dedication ceremony for the kohanim as detailed in
Vayikra 8:1-
13 (and/or in Shmot chapter 29)?
In what manner is this ceremony different?
Can you explain the reason for the similarities and
differences?
Review God's original commandment to set aside the
'bechor' [first born son] of each family as explained in
Shmot
13:1-2 (and 13:11-15). What does the word 'kadesh' in
Shmot
13:1 imply, and what would be the practical result of
this
commandment?
Based on that original mitzva, relate that
commandment
and its intention to the ceremony that is described in
Bamidbar 8:5-14 as well as Bamidbar 3:11-13 (&
13:14-51).
[Relate also to Shmot 32:26 & Devarim 10:8-9.]
How does this help you understanding the meaning of
the
word kadesh in Shmot 13:1 and the original purpose of
that
mitzva?
BETWEEN a NAZIR, a KOHEN and a LEVI
4. In the dedication ceremony of the levi'im (see
8:5-14), we
find the need to:
* sprinkle upon them special water
* shave off all of their hair
* wash their clothing and purification
* to offer a chatat and ola [w/ 'semicha']
* waive them before God [= 'tenufa']
In what manner are any of these 'rituals' similar
to the
laws of nazir (as described in Bamidbar chapter 6)? In
what
manner are they similar to the dedication ceremony of
the
kohanim (as described in Vayikra chapter 8)? Can you
explain
the significance of these parallels?
[Note especially Bamidbar 6:8,14-20; Vayikra
8:1-6,22.]
Relate your answer to the juxtaposition between
these
laws (and all of the other laws) in Bamidbar chapters 6
thru
8.
PART II - QUESTIONS FOR PREPARATION (for weekly shiur)
1. Clearly, the primary topic of the end of Parshat
Naso
(i.e. Bamidbar chapter 7) was the 'korbanot ha-nesi'im'
[dedication offerings of the tribal leaders].
What is the primary topic of the opening psukim in
Parshat Beha'alotcha (see 8:1-4)?
Can you identify a thematic connection between
these two
topics?
Note as well the primary topic of the next
'parshia',
i.e. 8:5-22. In what manner does the ceremony described
in
those psukim relate to the previous topics in chapters 7
& 8?
Could you consider chapters 7 thru 8 as a unit? If
so,
how would you title that unit? How does this unit
relate to
the earlier units in Sefer Bamidbar, and/or to the
topics that
will follow in chapter 9?
2. Review once again Bamidbar 8:1-4. In your opinion,
do
these psukim belong here, or somewhere else in Chumash?
If
so, where?
Relate to Shmot chapter 25, and the topic of that
chapter, as well as Shmot chapter 40.
[In your answer, be sure to relate to 7:1. See also
Rashbam,
Ibn Ezra, and Chizkuni on 8:2 as well as Rashi &
Ramban.]
3. When (i.e. on what day) did the events described in
8:5-22
take place? Based on your answer, how does this
ceremony
relate to the events in chapter 7, and to the details in
8:1-
4?
Is there any logic to the flow of these parshiot?
[In your answer, relate to last week's TSC
shiur on
the 'nesi'im'.]
4. In your opinion, do chapters 7-8 belong in Sefer
Bamidbar,
in Sefer Vayikra (chapter 9), or in Sefer Shmot (chapter
40)?
Why do you think that they are included in Sefer
Bamidbar?
How do they relate to chapters 9-10 that follow?
Do they relate as well to chapters 1-4. If so, how?
5. Can you identify a common topic for all of the
parshiot in
chapters 9 thru 10? If so, how does it relate to the
overall
theme of Sefer Bamidbar (as discussed in our
introductory
shiur to Sefer Bamidbar)?
Similarly, can you identify a common topic for all
of the
parshiot in chapters 11 thru 14? If so, how does that
topic
relate to the topic of chapters 9 thru 10?
6. In your opinion, what 'should have been' the topic
of
Sefer Bamidbar (from chapter 11 onward) had Bnei Yisrael
not
sinned at that time? What becomes the primary topic
'instead'?
7. What is special about 10:35-36? What is the purpose
of
the upside down 'nun's' that surround these two psukim?
Can you relate your answer to question #4 above?
Can you explain why Chazal understand these two
psukim as
a Sefer by itself? [See Shabbat 115b-116a.]
Relate your answer to what 'should have happened'
in
chapter 11 (i.e. had Bnei Yisrael not sinned), as
discussed in
the question above.
See also Rashi, Ramban, Seforno & Chizkuni on
10:35-36.
8. Relate your answers to the above questions to
Moshe's
anger with the people after the sin of the 'mit'avim'
and his
subsequent request that God relieve him from his
leadership
responsibilities? [See 11:3-14 and question #2 in Part
I
above.]
PART III - PARSHANUT
1. In your opinion, is the main topic of chapter 9
(i.e. 9:1-
14) 'pesach rishon' or 'pesach sheni'? [Explain your
answer.]
Relate to why this story is included in Sefer
Bamidbar.
Use your answer to explain the problem in the
chronological
order of these parshiot. [i.e. date of Bamidbar 1:1/
compared
to 9:1]
Now, see Rashi on 9:1.
What conclusion does Rashi reach? Why?
How does he explain why it is 'out of place'?
[See also Chizkuni.]
Next, see Ibn Ezra. Note how he explains why this
parshia is recorded here. How is his peirush different
than
Rashi?
[In your opinion, what peirush is closer to
'pshat'?]
Next, see Ramban. Usually, Ramban argues with the
opinion of 'ein mukdam u-me'uchar'. Why does he accept
it for
this pasuk? How does he explain why this parshia is
recorded
here? How does his peirush differ from Rashi & Ibn
Ezra?
Finally, see Seforno. Notice how comprehensive his
peirush is! How does he explain why this story is here
in the
context of theme of Sefer Bamidbar?
How does he relate this to the problem of ein
mukdam u-
me'uchar? [Note the final few lines!]
How does Seforno's commentary differ from Ramban's?
Can you explain why?
2. Read 10:29-34, the story of how Moshe offers Yitro
to
'come along' with them. Based on these psukim, is it
possible
to determine if Yitro indeed agreed to Moshe's offer?
Now, compare this story with the story of Yitro's
arrival
at Har Sinai in Shmot chapter 18. Note especially
18:27, as
it describes how Yitro left. In your opinion, does
18:27
(describing Yitro's departure back to Midyan) refer to
the
same story as here in Bamidbar 10:29-34, or did he first
go
back, and then return at a later time back to Bnei
Yisrael's
camp at Har Sinai?
In your opinion, in the story in Bamidbar, does
Yitro (=
Chovav) end up staying with Bnei Yisrael or does he go
back
home to Midyan?
See Rashi, Ramban, and Seforno. Note how each
commentary
deals with the above problem, and how each peirush
differs.
3. When Bnei Yisrael travel through the desert, where
is the
aron supposed to be? [i.e. at the front of the camp or
in the
middle?]
Relate to 9:11-28 as well as 10:33-36.
As you study 10:33, note how it describes the
manner by
which the aron leads the camp.
Was this the original plan?
* Based on Bamidbar 9:11-28, note 9:21.
* Based on Bamidbar 10:35.
* Based on Shmot 23:20-23.
* Based on Yehoshua chapter 3.
See Rashi on 10:33. How does he solve this
problem?
Why does Rashi conclude that there were two
arks?!
[Note also Chizkuni!!]
Next, see Ibn Ezra. Why does he claim that this
(first)
journey was different than the rest of the journeys that
would
follow?
Then, see Ramban. How is his peirush different
than
Rashi and Ibn Ezra's? Why does he begin with 'al derech
ha-
pshat'?
Finally, see Seforno.
In what manner is his commentary similar to Ibn
Ezra's
and how does it differ?
be-hatzlacha,
menachem
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 270.2.0/1497 -
Release Date: 6/11/2008 8:32 AM
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: bhalq.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 27057 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.atlchai.org/pipermail/par-reg/attachments/20080611/d681e6e9/attachment-0001.pdf
More information about the Par-reg
mailing list