[Par-reg] For Parshat Para
Menachem Leibtag
tsc at bezeqint.net
Thu Mar 12 15:34:50 EDT 2009
*************************************************************
THE TANACH STUDY CENTER [http://www.tanach.org]
In Memory of Rabbi Abraham Leibtag
Shiurim in Chumash & Navi by Menachem Leibtag
*************************************************************
"ZOT CHUKAT HA'TORAH"
[For Parshat Parah]
WHAT'S A CHOK, AND WHAT'S A TORAH?
How should one translate the phrase "ZOT CHUKAT HA'TORAH" (see 19:2)
in the opening psukim of Parshat Para?
[Note how just about every English translation slightly varies in their
attempt to interpret this verse, e.g. "the Torah's decree" (Stone & Living
Torah), "a ritual law" (JPS), etc.]
Many students of Chumash innocently assume that the word "torah"
refers to the entire Torah, while the word "chok" implies a specific law
that has no obvious reason; and hence - this opening pasuk informs the
reader that the laws of Parah Adumah (that will follow) will be the
quintessential example in the entire Bible of a law that doesn't make any
sense.
In the following shiur, we will consider an alternate understanding
of the words "chok" and "torah" in this pasuk, based on their meaning
elsewhere in Chumash. While doing so, we will attempt to arrive at a
clearer understanding of this special set of laws, and the purpose of this
enigmatic opening phrase.
INTRODUCTION
Today, in common conversation, the word 'Torah' is used to describe
either the entire Bible, or even the entire corpus of Jewish law. In fact,
even the study of the Oral Law, such as the Mishna and Talmud is referred to
'Torah study'.
However, when we examine the use of the word "torah" in Chumash, we find
that it has a very different meaning. Instead of referring to the entire
book, the word "torah" in the books of Vayikra and Bamidbar usually refers
to a specific type of law, usually one of a procedural nature.
For example, in our study of Parshat Tzav, we saw how each paragraph (in
the section describing how to offer the various korbanot / chapters 6 thru
7) began with the phrase
"zot torat ha' -----" -
['this is the procedure for the ------ offering: ..."
Hence, the phrase "zot TORAT ha'mincha..." (see 6:7-10) is translated:
"this is the PROCEDURE for how to offer the korban mincha" - followed by the
details concerning how the kohanim are to offer it. Similarly, "zot TORAT
ha'chatat" introduces the laws of how to offer the "korban chatat" (see 6:18
and 7:1, etc.).
An even better example is found in Sefer Bamidbar, at the conclusion of
the laws concerning the procedure that the priest must conduct to test
whether the "sota" [a wife accused by her husband for 'cheating'] was
innocent or guilty. Note the use of the word "torah" in the pasuk that
summarizes this lengthy process:
"zot TORAT ha'knaot - this is the torah [the procedure] for this case of
'jealousy', when a wife... or when the spirit of jealousy comes upon a man,
and he be jealous over his wife.. and the priest shall execute upon her all
this TORAH" - i.e. this procedure! (see Bamidbar 5:29-30 in its context)
With this background, we can begin our attempt to understand the
word "torah" in Parshat Para - to show that here as well, it refers to a
specific procedure (and not to the entire Chumash)!
THE LAWS OF TUMAT MEYT
To appreciate what procedures are discussed in Bamidbar chapter 19,
we must first provide a short overview of the basic laws of "tumat meyt"
[spiritual uncleanliness, caused by contact with a dead body].
According to Jewish law, if a person touches (or is in the same room
with) a dead body, he becomes "tamey" [spiritually unclean] for period of at
least seven days, during which time he is not permitted to enter the Temple
courtyard. To 'cleanse' himself of this "tumah", a special 'procedure' is
required. The kohen [priest] must sprinkle upon him from a special solution
consisting of spring water mixed with specially prepared ashes of a "para
Adumah" - a 'red heifer'.
The first sprinkling can only be performed after three days, and then
needs to be repeated four days later, i.e. on day seven. At sunset of that
seventh day, he becomes "tahor" [spiritually clean] and hence permitted once
again to enter the Temple.
TWO PROCEDURES IN THE PROCESS
Obviously, before the kohen can perform this 'sprinkling procedure'
- someone has to first make the 'ashes'. Hence, the first procedure
[="torah"] that Chumash will describe will be how to make these ashes. As
only a small amount (of ashes) is needed to make this special solution, the
ashes collected from the burning of each "para aduma" could suffice for
decades.
After the explanation of this first procedure, Chumash will explain
the details for the second "torah" - i.e. the procedure whereby the kohen
sprinkles this solution of the "tmey meyt".
Therefore, as we study chapter 19, we should expect to uncover the
details of two procedures:
PROCEDURE #1 - Making the 'ashes' of the parah adumah.
[as detailed in 19:2-9!)
PROCEDURE #2 - Sprinkling these ashes (mixed with water).
[as detailed in 19:17-19!]
As we study these psukim, we will show how these two procedures also
contain several consequential laws, which we identify as "chukim"!
Therefore, before we begin our detailed study, we must first explain the
Biblical meaning of the word "chok".
WHAT'S A CHOK?
Contrary to popular opinion, a "chok" is not the name for a Biblical
law that doesn't make sense (or has no reason). Indeed, we will find
"chukim" that have no obvious reason, and that may even be 'characteristic'
of a "chok" - but it is not the definition of a "chok"! Instead, a "chok"
is a statute - i.e. a set law or ordinance that doesn't change.
To clarify this point, let's take an example from a law that you are
all familiar with: the Korban Pesach. Everyone knows why we offer the
Korban Pesach - to commemorate how God saved Am Yisrael from the Tenth
Plague. Certainly, this mitzvah makes a lot of sense, but to your surprise
- Chumash refers to this law as a CHOK and gives a reason! Let's take a
look:
"... and you should keep this commandment (of Korban Pesach) as a CHOK for
you and your children for ever. When you come into the Land that God shall
give you... keep this ritual. And when your children will ask: What is this
ritual for you? Tell them it is the Pesach offering, for God passed over the
houses of Bnei Yisrael when He smote the Egyptians..." (see Shmot 12:24-27!)
In fact, Chumash refers to all of the Jewish Holidays as CHUKIM (see
Parshat Emor - Vayikra 23:14,21,31 & 41) - because they are set in the
yearly calendar, and repeat themselves every year!
Chumash also uses the word "chok" to describe statutes that are not
mitzvot. For example, when Sefer Breishit describes how Yosef purchased of
the land from the Egyptians, we are informed that he cannot acquire the land
belonging to the priests - because:
"... it is the CHOK of the priests by Pharaoh, that they eat their portion
[lechem CHUKAM] that Pharaoh had given them..." (see Breishit 47:20-22 and
its context)
Two psukim later, we find another example, where Chumash describes the
20% set land tax imposed on Egyptian produce as a "chok" (see Breishit
47:26)
For a similar reason, when Bnei Yisrael are required to produce a
certain daily output of bricks, Sefer Shmot describes this set quota as a
CHOK:
"...and the taskmasters of Bnei Yisrael scolded them saying - Why did you
not complete CHOK'CHEM [your quota] to make bricks as before..." (see Shmot
5:14 and its context)
Note also how Yirmiyahu refers to the laws of astronomy, i.e. the
constant and unchanging cycles of the sun and moon around the earth, as
"CHUKOT shamayim v'aretz" (see Yirmiyahu 33:25 and even better, see
Yirmiyahu 31:35-36!).
For this reason, the holidays in Parshat Emor are referred to as
CHUKIM for they celebrated on a REGULAR basis, once a year based on the
solar (agricultural) calendar. Hence, a "chok" implies something constant
that doesn't change - a statute.
THE CHOK OF TUMAT MEYT
Let's see now how the word "chok" would apply to the laws of "tumat
meyt".
The law that a person who touches a dead body becomes "tamey" for seven
days should definitely be considered a "chok" - for it is a law that never
changes - it remains constant.
[In modern Hebrew we find a similar use, where the 'laws of nature' are
called CHUKEI ha'TEVA. Take for example Newton's laws of motion - they are
set and don't change.]
Based on this definition, a CHOK can be logical, but it doesn't have
to be! Certain CHUKIM may be beyond our comprehension, however many other
CHUKIM can actually make a lot of sense. Therefore we find some "chukim"
that are quite logical, while others are not - however, the fact that a
certain law is not logical, does not define it as a CHOK!
In contrast, a MISHPAT, as its name implies, is a JUDGEMENT - based
on reason. The very concept of a MISHPAT relates to a decision or judgment
that must be made between two claims that come before the court. Hence, the
Torah refers to the entire set of civil laws relating to damages etc. in
Shmot chapters 21->23 as MISHPATIM (see Shmot 21:1 & 24:3).
With this background, let's read through Parshat Parah and attempt
to identify more precisely where we find a TORAH and where we find a CHOK,
and how they relate to one another. As we read, we will notice how the
chapter neatly divides into two sections, according to the two procedures
that we mentioned above.
[As a teacher's note - to explain this concept of TORAH as a procedure, take
the word 'recipe' as an example. A recipe demands a certain procedure to
attain a certain goal, i.e. a sponge cake recipe requires that we take 4
eggs, flour, water, sugar; mix them into a batter, and bake it etc. The
result - a cake - and hence the recipe card is titled: Sponge cake. In a
similar manner, the Parshat Parah informs us of the proper 'recipe' [i.e.
the TORAH] to make the ashes for "efer parah"!]
PROCEDURE #1 & its CHUKIM
We assumed above that the first "torah" (or procedure) would
describe how to prepare the "efer ha'parah" [the ashes of the heifer], that
will later be used for sprinkling). As you review 19:2-6, note how these
psukim describe precisely this procedure:
19:2-3 -
Take a red heifer (one without a blemish) and give it to Elazar (the
deputy high priest) who must slaughter it outside the camp.
19:4 -
Sprinkle the blood of the heifer seven times opposite the entrance to the
Ohel Moed.
19:5-6 -
Burn the carcass of the heifer together with branches from both a hyssop and
cedar tree, etc., until in turns into ashes.
Now that the 'ashes' have been prepared, the Torah informs us of two
special CHUKIM that accompany this process:
19:7 -
The kohen who PERFORMS this procedure becomes "tamey" [that's a CHOK],
therefore he must wash his clothes and remains "tamey" until the evening
["tumat yom"].
19:8 -
The kohen who BURNS the animal becomes "tamey" [that's also a CHOK], and
must wash his clothes etc.
Then Chumash continues with the final stages of this procedure:
19:9 -
A clean person must COLLECT the ashes and stores them outside the camp. This
is actually the final stage of the procedure [i.e. part of the TORAH].
19:10 -
This person who collects the ashes also become "tamey" [just like the other
two]. That's yet another CHOK!
Hence, we find that this specific procedure of making the "efer" is
accompanied by several special CHUKIM. Note how these CHUKIM, even though
they are not an integral part of the procedure, they are a direct
consequence - and therefore should be defined as related "chukim"
[statutes], but not an integral part of the procedure.
[If we use again our "mashal" from the cake recipe, the person mixing the
batter must later wash his hands, but that does not affect how the cake
comes out!]
To prove these definitions, let's take a more careful look at this
last pasuk, as it explains the purpose of this procedure. i.e. for these
ashes must be used for the CHOK of "tumat meyt":.
"The person who collects the ashes must wash his clothes, and [these ashes]
are to be [used] for Bnei Yisrael for a CHUKAT OLAM - an everlasting
statute: [i.e. introducing the CHOK of:]
- One who touches a dead body becomes "tamey" for seven days. If he is
sprinkled upon on the third & seventh day, he becomes "tahor"; if not he
remains "tamey"... and should he enter the Mikdash, he is to be cut off from
Israel."
(see 19:10-13)
These psukim end the first section of Parshat Parah, as the ashes
are prepared, and we are also informed of what they will be needed for.
Now that the "efer" is prepared, we are ready to discuss the second
TORAH [procedure] found in this chapter, i.e. the precise details of this
'sprinkling process' - known in Hebrew as "torat ha'haza'ah".
PROCEDURE #2 and its CHUKIM
Let's take a look now at 19:14. Note how this pasuk (at first
glance) seems to contradict our definition of a TORAH:
"And this is the TORAH - a person who dies in a tent, everything in the tent
becomes tamey [unclean] for seven days. And any open vessel... it too
becomes tamey..."
(19:14-15)
Based on our above definitions of CHOK & TORAH, this law [of how one
contracts "tumat meyt"] should be considered a "chok" for it describes a set
law that never changes! Why then does 19:14 introduce this law as a TORAH?
The answer to this question is quite simple.
If one reads the next set of psukim carefully, it becomes clear that the
phrase "ZOT HA'TORAH" in 19:14 is INTRODUCING the procedure that is defined
later on 19:17-19. In other words, we need to add the word 'for' in 19:14
[i.e. a "lamed" after "zot ha'torah L'adam asher yamut b'ohel..." [which is
implicit based on the context - see also Rashbam on 19:2!].
In this manner, 19:14-16 should be translated as follows:
"This is the TORAH - FOR:
a) the case when a person dies in a tent, then everything in the tent
becomes "tamey" (19:14), [and for...]
b) any open vessel in that tent (19:15), or
c) any person who touched a dead body in the field or bone or grave (who
also becomes "tamey" (19:16)
THEN: for any of these "tamey" persons or objects, we must take from
the "efer" [the ashes of the heifer] and put it into a vessel with water
(see 19:17) in order to perform PROCEDURE #2 [i.e. "torat ha'za'ah"], as
explained in the next set of psukim:
"A person who is TAHOR [clean] shall take a hyssop branch, dip it in the
water [mixed with the ashes], and then sprinkle it on (either) the tent and
vessels, or on the person who touched the bones... or who touched a
grave..." (see 19:18).
This procedure, as described in 19:18, was first introduced by the
phrase "zot ha'TORAH" in 19:14. The next pasuk (19:19) informs us that this
procedure must be repeated on both the third and seventh days (see 19:19).
THE CHUKIM OF PROCEDURE #2
This second procedure, just like the first procedure, is also
accompanied by certain consequential "chukim":
a) he who sprinkles the solution becomes "tamey"
(see 19:21, see also Rashi who quotes Chazal's understanding that it refers
to only someone who carries this solution, but not actually the one who
sprinkles it);
b) anyone who touches this solution also becomes "tamey"
(see 19:22).
[i.e. "tamey for one day, he must wash his clothes and then he becomes
"tahor" at sunset.]
Note how both Procedures #1 and #2 carry with them very similar
consequential CHUKIM, i.e. anyone who is involved in this process of either
making the "efer", or sprinkling it upon someone else, becomes "tamey".
CHUKAT ha'TORAH
Based on these definitions, we can suggest an explanation for the
opening phrase "CHUKAT ha'TORAH" that introduces these laws (see 19:1). As
we have shown, this chapter contains many special CHUKIM that relate to the
TORAH (procedures) of "tahara" from "tumat meyt", i.e.
(1) making the ashes; and
(2) sprinkling the "mei chatat" - water w/ashes solution.
Each of these two procedures carry special "chukim" that accompany
these procedures: The special chukim all have one common denominator. Anyone
involved in these procedures for cleansing one who is "tamey" - he himself
becomes "tamey". This strange CHOK that by making someone else TAHOR you
become TAMEY is an inherent 'statute' [CHOK] of this 'procedure' [TORAH].
Hence, this may be the technical meaning of this introductory phrase "chukat
ha'torah", i.e.
- the CHOK {that those involved becomes "tamey"] in
the TORAH [procedure] required to cleanse "tumat meyt".
Clearly, this CHOK appears to negate all logic - for why should the
person involved in the process of making someone else TAHOR become TAMEY?
For this reason, this specific CHOK becomes a classic example of a law that
doesn't make sense (see Rashi 19:2). HOWEVER, this does not mean that the
definition of a CHOK is a law that doesn't make sense! As we explained
above, a CHOK is a set law. CHUKIM don't have to make sense, but certainly
it is OK if they do.
THE RAMBAM
A similar explanation of CHUKIM is found in the Rambam in his
concluding section of Sefer Avodah in Hilchot Meilla. Note how Rambam
differentiates between CHUKIM and MISHPATIM:
"... the MISHPATIM are laws whose reason is evident ["taamam geluyah"] and
the benefit for keeping them is apparent in this world, e.g. the prohibition
to steal or to murder, or honoring one's parents; while the CHUKIM are laws
whose reason is not evident ["taamam eino geluyah"]... and the laws of
Korbanot fall under category of CHUKIM..." [see Hilchot Meilla 8:8]
Note the examples that Rambam uses for Mishpatim - stealing, murder,
and honoring one's parents. Even though these are mitzvot in the Torah, they
are based on a very obvious rational. Even without the Torah, most societies
establish similar laws for they are based on common sense. In contrast,
CHUKIM are divine decrees and as such do not necessarily need to be based on
any obvious reason. Nevertheless, note how Rambam demands that we make every
effort to understand God's reason for the CHUKIM as well:
"It is fitting that one should contemplate the laws of the Torah to
understand their reasoning to the best of his ability. But should he find a
law that he does not understand (or does not make sense to him)... he should
not conclude that they are any less important, rather he must keep them and
treat them with the utmost respect...
(see Rambam Hilchot Meillah - the beginning of 8:8)
Even though CHUKIM (by their very nature) don't have to make sense
["ein taamam glu'yah"], nevertheless Rambam implores that we make every
effort to try to understand them, Should one be unable to find a reason for
a certain CHOK, he must relate this lack of understanding to his own
inability to grasp God's infinite wisdom rather than conclude that the CHOK
has no purpose. [Note for example how Ramban mentions if this final halacha
that "korbanot" are a classic example of CHUKIM, yet in his MOREH NEVUCHIM
he makes effort to explain the reason and logic for each and every type of
korban! In fact, Rambam claims that if we were aware of all the various
types of Avodah Zarah that existed in the time of Yetziat Mitzraim, we would
be able to understand the reason for ALL of the CHUKIM of korbanot! [See
Moreh III, the closing two paragraphs of chapter 49.] In fact, one could
consider Rambam's attempt in Moreh Nevuchim to provide a reason for the
various laws korbanot an example of what he suggested in Hilchot Meillah 8:8
- i.e. that we attempt with the best of our ability to understand the
reasons for CHUKIM as well.]
This dialectic, where on the one hand we must 'blindly' accept each
and every one of God's CHUKIM, even though we may not understand them, yet
at the same time we are encouraged to make every intellectual effort to
attempt to comprehend their reason - is a beautiful example of the challenge
of our faith in God. In Judaism, our faith in God can only be enhanced by
our constant quest for reason and truth.
shabbat shalom,
menachem
==============
FOR FURTHER IYUN
1. In Sefer Devarim, it appears that the word TORAH is used in a very
general context, referring to entire set of mitzvot including many chukim
and mishpatim. See 1:5, 4:44 - "v'zot ha'Torah asher sam Moshe...", 27:3
etc.
However, if you remember our study of the main speech of Sefer
Devarim, the use of the word Torah may remain in its original context as a
procedure. To determine what the goal of that overall procedure is, note
carefully 5:1-2, 5:28, 6:1, and most important -the closing psukim of that
speech in 26:16-19, and relate to Shmot 19:5-6!
In other words, the entire set of laws recorded in the main speech in
Sefer Devarim (chapters 5-26) are consistently referred to as a "torah" -
for they comprise the 'procedure' for how to make Am Yisrael an "am kadosh"
- just as God originally proposed (and Bnei Yisrael accepted) at Maamad Har
Sinai!]
2. Can you find the logic of this chok that one who makes someone else tahor
becomes tamey? Is there a law of 'the conservation of tumah'?! [Ask
anyone in the "kiruv" business!]
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: chukat3.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 39043 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.atlchai.org/pipermail/par-reg/attachments/20090312/e51a240c/attachment-0001.pdf
More information about the Par-reg
mailing list