[Par-reg] Bhaalotcha - questions for self study

Menachem Leibtag tsc at bezeqint.net
Mon May 24 03:16:13 EDT 2010


**********************************************************
***

     THE TANACH STUDY CENTER [http://www.tanach.org]

          In Memory of Rabbi Abraham Leibtag

     Shiurim in Chumash & Navi by Menachem Leibtag

**********************************************************
***

 

          PARSHAT BEHA'ALOTCHA

 

PART I - QUESTIONS FOR THE 'SHABBOS TABLE'

 

LIGHTING THE MENORA

1.  Most probably, you have read the opening pasuk of
Parshat

Beha'alotcha many times, and it is often translated as

follows:

"...when you go up to light the menora..." (see 8:2).

 

     Do you agree with this translation?  Is this an exact

translation of the Hebrew?

     If not, what would be a more precise translation?  [
Be

sure that you understand the meaning of the word 'ner'.]

     Now, read Shmot 25:31-38, especially 25:36-37.  What
is

the precise definition of 'neirot' according to these
psukim?

     See Rashi on 25:37!

     Relate this to Bamidbar 8:4, and its description of
the

menora as 'miksha' [made from one piece of gold].  In your

opinion, are the neirot [of the menora] part of this
miksha,

or are they separate from it?  [In other words, are the
neirot

permanently connected to the menora, or are they
removable?

     If they were removable, can you explain why?

     From a technical standpoint, how did the kohen light
the

menora each day?  [i.e. how did he set up the wicks and
oil in

the candles?  What did the candle look like? etc.]

     See also Ibn Ezra & Chizkuni on Rashi 25:37.

     Based on these questions, how would you now interpret

8:2?

 

A CHANGE IN ATTITUDE?

2.  In chapter 11, as Bnei Yisrael begin their journey
from

Har Sinai, Moshe Rabbeinu is very angered by the people's

behavior.  Note Moshe's complaint to God in 11:10-15,

especially 11:11!

     How is this both parallel and different to Moshe's

petitions to God in Sefer Shmot, based on Shmot 5:22,
32:30-

32, and 33:16?

     Can you explain the reason for his 'change' in
attitude?

      Relate to Bamidbar 11:4-6, while noting Breishit3:6.

     In what manner is the nature of Bnei Yisrael's sin in

this incident worse than their sin at 'chet ha-egel', and
why

would this affect Moshe Rabbeinu's reaction?

     What is God's response to Moshe's complaint in
Bamidbar

11:10-15, and how does this response relate to his
complaint?

     See 11:16-17.  Relate this to the above parallel.

     Is Moshe Rabbeinu's reaction to this incident similar
to

his reaction to the other complaints that will later arise
in

Sefer Bamidbar?  Explain what is similar and what is

different.

     [Relate to Moshe's reaction to the incidents at 'chet
ha-

meraglim', Korach's rebellion, and 'mei meriva'.]

     How do the above questions relate to the more general

topic of 'leadership' in Sefer Bamidbar?

 

A LEVITE FOR EVERY 'BECHOR'

3.  In what manner is the special dedication ceremony for
the

levi'im (as described in Bamidbar 8:5-14) similar to the

dedication ceremony for the kohanim as detailed in Vayikra
8:1-

13 (and/or in Shmot chapter 29)?

     In what manner is this ceremony different?

     Can you explain the reason for the similarities and

differences?

     Review God's original commandment to set aside the

'bechor' [first born son] of each family as explained in
Shmot

13:1-2 (and 13:11-15).  What does the word 'kadesh' in
Shmot

13:1 imply, and what would be the practical result of this

commandment?

     Based on that original mitzva, relate that
commandment

and its intention to the ceremony that is described in

Bamidbar 8:5-14 as well as Bamidbar 3:11-13 (& 13:14-51).

     [Relate also to Shmot 32:26 & Devarim 10:8-9.]

     How does this help you understanding the meaning of
the

word kadesh in Shmot 13:1 and the original purpose of that

mitzva?

 

BETWEEN a NAZIR, a KOHEN and a LEVI

4.  In the dedication ceremony of the levi'im (see
8:5-14), we

find the need to:

     * sprinkle upon them special water

     * shave off all of their hair

     * wash their clothing and purification

     * to offer a chatat and ola  [w/ 'semicha']

     * waive them before God  [= 'tenufa']

 

     In what manner are any of these 'rituals' similar to
the

laws of nazir (as described in Bamidbar chapter 6)?  In
what

manner are they similar to the dedication ceremony of the

kohanim (as described in Vayikra chapter 8)?  Can you
explain

the significance of these parallels?

     [Note especially Bamidbar 6:8,14-20; Vayikra
8:1-6,22.]

     Relate your answer to the juxtaposition between these

laws (and all of the other laws) in Bamidbar chapters 6
thru

8.

 

PART II - QUESTIONS FOR PREPARATION (for weekly shiur)

1.  Clearly, the primary topic of the end of Parshat Naso

(i.e. Bamidbar chapter 7) was the 'korbanot ha-nesi'im'

[dedication offerings of the tribal leaders].

     What is the primary topic of the opening psukim in

Parshat Beha'alotcha (see 8:1-4)?

     Can you identify a thematic connection between these
two

topics?

     Note as well the primary topic of the next 'parshia',

i.e. 8:5-22.  In what manner does the ceremony described
in

those psukim relate to the previous topics in chapters 7 &
8?

     Could you consider chapters 7 thru 8 as a unit?  If
so,

how would you title that unit?  How does this unit relate
to

the earlier units in Sefer Bamidbar, and/or to the topics
that

will follow in chapter 9?

 

2.  Review once again Bamidbar 8:1-4.  In your opinion, do

these psukim belong here, or somewhere else in Chumash?
If

so, where?

     Relate to Shmot chapter 25, and the topic of that

chapter, as well as Shmot chapter 40.

[In your answer, be sure to relate to 7:1.  See also
Rashbam,

Ibn Ezra, and Chizkuni on 8:2 as well as Rashi & Ramban.]

 

3.  When (i.e. on what day) did the events described in
8:5-22

take place?  Based on your answer, how does this ceremony

relate to the events in chapter 7, and to the details in
8:1-

4?

     Is there any logic to the flow of these parshiot?

          [In your answer, relate to last week's TSC shiur
on

the 'nesi'im'.]

 

4.  In your opinion, do chapters 7-8 belong in Sefer
Bamidbar,

in Sefer Vayikra (chapter 9), or in Sefer Shmot (chapter
40)?

     Why do you think that they are included in Sefer

Bamidbar?

     How do they relate to chapters 9-10 that follow?

     Do they relate as well to chapters 1-4. If so, how?

 

5.  Can you identify a common topic for all of the
parshiot in

chapters 9 thru 10?  If so, how does it relate to the
overall

theme of Sefer Bamidbar (as discussed in our introductory

shiur to Sefer Bamidbar)?

     Similarly, can you identify a common topic for all of
the

parshiot in chapters 11 thru 14?  If so, how does that
topic

relate to the topic of chapters 9 thru 10?

 

6.  In your opinion, what 'should have been' the topic of

Sefer Bamidbar (from chapter 11 onward) had Bnei Yisrael
not

sinned at that time?  What becomes the primary topic

'instead'?

 

7.  What is special about 10:35-36?  What is the purpose
of

the upside down 'nun's' that surround these two psukim?

     Can you relate your answer to question #4 above?

     Can you explain why Chazal understand these two
psukim as

a Sefer by itself?  [See Shabbat 115b-116a.]

     Relate your answer to what 'should have happened' in

chapter 11 (i.e. had Bnei Yisrael not sinned), as
discussed in

the question above.

     See also Rashi, Ramban, Seforno & Chizkuni on
10:35-36.

 

8.  Relate your answers to the above questions to Moshe's

anger with the people after the sin of the 'mit'avim' and
his

subsequent request that God relieve him from his
leadership

responsibilities?  [See 11:3-14 and question #2 in Part I

above.]

 

PART III - PARSHANUT

1.  In your opinion, is the main topic of chapter 9 (i.e.
9:1-

14) 'pesach rishon' or 'pesach sheni'?  [Explain your
answer.]

     Relate to why this story is included in Sefer
Bamidbar.

Use your answer to explain the problem in the
chronological

order of these parshiot. [i.e. date of Bamidbar 1:1/
compared

to 9:1]

     Now, see Rashi on 9:1.

          What conclusion does Rashi reach?  Why?

          How does he explain why it is 'out of place'?

               [See also Chizkuni.]

 

     Next, see Ibn Ezra.  Note how he explains why this

parshia is recorded here. How is his peirush different
than

Rashi?

    [In your opinion, what peirush is closer to 'pshat'?]

 

     Next, see Ramban.  Usually, Ramban argues with the

opinion of 'ein mukdam u-me'uchar'.  Why does he accept it
for

this pasuk?  How does he explain why this parshia is
recorded

here?  How does his peirush differ from Rashi & Ibn Ezra?

 

     Finally, see Seforno.  Notice how comprehensive his

peirush is!  How does he explain why this story is here in
the

context of theme of Sefer Bamidbar?

     How does he relate this to the problem of ein mukdam
u-

me'uchar?  [Note the final few lines!]

     How does Seforno's commentary differ from Ramban's?

          Can you explain why?

 

2.  Read 10:29-34, the story of how Moshe offers Yitro to

'come along' with them.  Based on these psukim, is it
possible

to determine if Yitro indeed agreed to Moshe's offer?

     Now, compare this story with the story of Yitro's
arrival

at Har Sinai in Shmot chapter 18.  Note especially 18:27,
as

it describes how Yitro left.  In your opinion, does 18:27

(describing Yitro's departure back to Midyan) refer to the

same story as here in Bamidbar 10:29-34, or did he first
go

back, and then return at a later time back to Bnei
Yisrael's

camp at Har Sinai?

     In your opinion, in the story in Bamidbar, does Yitro
(=

Chovav) end up staying with Bnei Yisrael or does he go
back

home to Midyan?

     See Rashi, Ramban, and Seforno.  Note how each
commentary

deals with the above problem, and how each peirush
differs.

 

3.  When Bnei Yisrael travel through the desert, where is
the

aron supposed to be?  [i.e. at the front of the camp or in
the

middle?]

     Relate to 9:11-28 as well as 10:33-36.

     As you study 10:33, note how it describes the manner
by

which the aron leads the camp.

     Was this the original plan?

     *    Based on Bamidbar 9:11-28, note 9:21.

     *    Based on Bamidbar 10:35.

     *    Based on Shmot 23:20-23.

     *    Based on Yehoshua chapter 3.

 

     See Rashi on 10:33.  How does he solve this problem?

          Why does Rashi conclude that there were two
arks?!

               [Note also Chizkuni!!]

 

     Next, see Ibn Ezra.  Why does he claim that this
(first)

journey was different than the rest of the journeys that
would

follow?

     Then, see Ramban.  How is his peirush different than

Rashi and Ibn Ezra's?  Why does he begin with 'al derech
ha-

pshat'?

     Finally, see Seforno.

     In what manner is his commentary similar to Ibn
Ezra's

and how does it differ?

 

                              be-hatzlacha,

                              menachem

 

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: bhalq.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 27057 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.atlchai.org/pipermail/par-reg/attachments/20100524/7c484663/attachment-0001.pdf 


More information about the Par-reg mailing list