[Par-reg] Vayishlach - questions for self study

Menachem Leibtag tsc at bezeqint.net
Sun Nov 14 16:25:53 EST 2010


"DEDICATED IN COMMEMORATION OF THE YARZHEIT OF

REUVEN BEN MOSHE A"H

17 KISLEV 5757"

 

**********************************************************
***

     THE TANACH STUDY CENTER [http://www.tanach.org]

          In Memory of Rabbi Abraham Leibtag

     Shiurim in Chumash & Navi by Menachem Leibtag

**********************************************************
***

 

                     PARSHAT  VA'YISHLACH

 

PART I - QUESTIONS FOR THE 'SHABBOS TABLE'

 

'TRICKERY' IN YAAKOV AVINU'S LIFE

1.  Review the various stories about Yaakov Avinu in
Parshiot

Toldot and Va'yetze, noting almost each one involves some
sort

of "trickery".  [Note when Yaakov uses trickery, and when

trickery is used against Yaakov.]

     a) Can you discern a pattern?

     b) In each of these stories, can the trickery be

justified?

     c) In your opinion, is Yaakov Avinu later 'punished'
for

this trickery? If so, when and how?

     d) In your opinion, [if he indeed is later punished
for

this trickery] does this necessarily imply that Yaakov was

'wrong' in his actions? Explain!

 

2. Next, review the beginning of Parshat Vayishlach (32:4-

32:25), noting how Yaakov prepares for his confrontation
with

Esav by telling his messengers not only to present a gift,
but

also to inform Esav that he [Yaakov] will be coming

'momentarily'.  [To verify this, carefully review
32:18-22!]

     Try to explain as well why Yaakov finds it necessary
to

leave 'gaps' between each flock that he sends.

     In your opinion, does Yaakov truly plan to confront
Esav,

or is his plan a 'stall' to allow him extra time to 'run-

away'.  Base your answer on the other actions that Yaakov

takes, as well as to the fears that he expresses in his
prayer

(to which God does not seem to provide an immediate
reply)!

     In your opinion, is Yaakov using trickery (once
again) in

an attempt to run away from his brother, or does he truly
plan

to confront him?

     Then, review 32:24 (i.e. when Yaakov crosses the
Yakok

stream).  In your opinion, is Yaakov crossing that stream
to

meet Esav or to run away from him?  Now, see Rashbam on
32:23!

[See other commentators as well (who disagree).]

 

3.  Based on your answer to the above question, attempt to

explain the deeper meaning of Yaakov's struggle with the

"malach" (see 32:24-30), i.e. why does God send someone to

wrestle with him.  In you answer, relate as well to the

blessing that Yaakov receives in the aftermath of that

struggle.

     Who does Yaakov meet immediately after this struggle
is

over, and what does he do (see 33:1-3)?  Relate this fact
to

your answer to the above questions!

     Based on the above questions, suggest a possible
meaning

for Yaakov's name change to Yisrael in the aftermath of
this

incident.

 

THE SHOWDOWN WITH ESAV

4. In your opinion, when Esav first left to meet Yaakov
(see

32:6), was his original intention to fight against Yaakov,
or

did he just want to greet him? In your answer, relate to

33:1-17, especially 33:4. Relate also to 27:41-45.

     Now see Rashi on 33:4 and then Ibn Ezra! [Note
Seforno

and Radak as well on 33:4.]  Can you explain the reason
for

these different approaches to this 'open question'?

 

5.  In your opinion, was it proper for Yaakov to bow down

seven times in front of Esav?  Was he simply trying to
appease

Esav, or was this an attempt to indicate something more

significant?

     Relate to 27:28-29, and see Ramban on 32:4 (and
Radak).

          [See also Rashbam on 32:29 and Chizkuni on
32:5.]

     Finally, see Maharam on 32:5 (in Torat Chaim
edition).

['Right wingers' will probably enjoy this commentary (at
least

more than Ramban's).]

 

PART II - QUESTIONS FOR PREPARATION (for weekly shiur)

 

For Shiur #1 -  FROM YAAKOV TO YISRAEL

  [Note: It would be helpful to answer the above
'Questions

  for the shabbos table' as additional preparation for
this

  shiur.]

1.  Recall how Parshat Va'yetze concluded with Yaakov
meeting

the "maalachei Elokim" [angels of God] - see 32:1-3.  In
your

opinion, did this have any affect on his decision to send

messengers to meet Esav (see 32:4-5).

     In your answer, relate to the angels that Yaakov
first

saw in Bet El before leaving Eretz Canaan, and God's
promise

to him at that time (see 28:12-15).  Relate as well to why

Yaakov had to run away in the first place, and for how
long

his mother told him that he should stay away for (see
27:41-

45).

     In your opinion, does Yaakov expect to find that Esav

still wants to kill him, or does he think that Esav is no

longer so angry?

 

2.  Next, review 32:9-12 - i.e. Yaakov's prayer that God
save

him from Esav - noting how he recalls several earlier
promises

that God had made. How does this prayer relate to his
original

assumption regarding Esav and the report he received from
his

messengers that Esav is approaching with four hundred men?

     Try to find the 'sources' (in Chumash) for what
Yaakov

mentions in 32:9 and 32:12.  Can you explain why Yaakov
chose

to relate to specifically these promises in his prayer?
(Be

sure to relate to 22:15-18.)

 

3.  Does God answer Yaakov's prayer?  If so, when; and in
what

manner?

     It appears that God did not provide Yaakov with an

immediate answer to this prayer. In your opinion, did this

affect (in any manner) Yaakov's plan for confronting (or

running away) from Esav?  If so, explain how.

 

4. Based on everything that Yaakov does between 32:4 and

32:23, how does Yaakov plan to save his family?

     Note how the next event is his struggle in 32:24-30.
In

your opinion, was this confrontation simply 'incidental',
or

did God send this person?  If the latter, can you suggest
a

reason why?  Relate your reason to the above questions.

 

5.  At the end of this struggle, Yaakov asks for a
blessing,

and the angel changes his name from Yaakov to Yisrael (see

32:28).  Attempt to relate this name change to all the

previous events.  Explain as well why this should be

considered a 'blessing'!

 

6. In what manner is Yaakov's name change to Yisrael
different

than Avram's name change to AvraHam?  [Be sure to note at

least two distinctions.]

     Based on your answer, why do you think that Yaakov

continues to be called Yaakov, even after this name
change?

Relate you answer to the above questions.

     In your opinion, what does each name represent?

     See the commentaries of Ibn Ezra, Rashbam, and
Chizkuni

on 35:10, noting how they relate to this question.

 

7. Review 35:9-16, noting how we find once again that
Yaakov's

name is changed to Yisrael.  In your opinion, does the
story

in 25:9-16 CONTRADICT the story in 32:27-29? Or, is this

simply a REPETITION, or possibly a CONFIRMATION, or maybe
an

ADDITION?  Explain.

     Next, review 28:3-4, i.e. Yitzchak's blessing to
Yaakov

before he first left Eretz Canaan, noting the purpose of
that

blessing as well as God's Name [i.e. Elokim] that Yitzchak

invokes at that time.   In what manner is that blessing

similar to the blessing that Yaakov receives from God at
this

time?  Can you explain why?

 

8.  If you follow the commentaries of Ramban and Seforno
in

chapter 32, you'll notice how they find numerous parallels

between these events in Yaakov's life and the history of
Am

Yisrael.  Can you explain what leads them to this
conclusion?

 

For Shiur #2 - WHEN DOES YAAKOV RETURN TO BET EL?

1.  In your opinion, how much time elapses between the
events

recorded in 32:27-29, and those recorded in 35:9-15? [Or
at

least what events took place in the interim?]  How would
this

affect your understanding of the connection between these
two

events?

 

2.  Recall that Yaakov had made a "neder" before his
departure

to Padan Aram (see 28:18-22).

    Based on that promise, what would you expect Yaakov to
do

immediately upon his return to Eretz Canaan?

     Does he do fulfill that promise?  If so, when, and
why

then?  If not, can you explain why he doesn't?

 

3. Review 30:25, 31:1-3, 31:13, 31:18.  Based on those
psukim,

would you expect Yaakov to return immediately upon his
arrival

to his father and/or to Bet-El?

     Can you explain why he doesn't?

 

4. Make a list of all of the events that take place in
Parshat

Va'yishlach. As you do so, make special note of its
division

into 'parshiot'.  Attempt to determine the amount of time
that

elapses from one event to the next.  In your opinion, does
the

progression of these events make sense?

 

5.  Based on 31:41, 29:20-32, and 31:23, approximately how
old

are Yaakov's children when he first returns to Eretz
Canaan?

How old is Dina (maximum)?  How old are Levi & Shimon?

     When you read the story about Dina and Shchem in
chapter

34, how old do Dina, Shimon & Levi seem to be during this

incident?  Based on the above, attempt to reach a
conclusion

concerning how many years elapsed between Yaakov's arrival
at

Shchem and the incident with Dina?

 

6.  In your opinion, does it make sense that until that
time

he had never yet gone to visit his father, or to fulfill
his

"neder" at Bet-el?  If he did, then why does the text not

indicate so?  If he had not, can you explain why he
didn't?

 

7. Read 35:1-8 carefully, noting how it forms its own

"parshia" (and hence it is separate from 35:9-22).

     What is the thematic connection between 35:1-8 and
the

story of 'Dina & Shchem' in chapter 34? Could it be
considered

part of the same story?

     Note carefully why God instructs Yaakov to go to
Bet-el

in 35:1-3, i.e. for what purpose.  Is there a precedent
for

this purpose at this site of Bet El?  Does this relate in
any

manner to Yaakov's "neder" in 28:15-22?

     Review once again 35:1-8, noting the "mizbayach" that

Yaakov builds and its purpose.  Does this relate in any
manner

to his "neder"? If so, explain how; if not explain why it

doesn't - and why he does build this mizbayach.

 

8. Now read 35:9-22 carefully.  Does it make sense that
this

story takes place immediately afterward (i.e. after
35:1-8),

or could one entertain the possibility that it took place
much

earlier?

     In answer, relate to the textual parallels between
35:9

and 33:18 -"b'vo'oh m'Padan Aram...".   If so, what
problems

raised above (regarding the story of Dina in Shchem) would
be

solved?

     If this 'parshia' indeed did take place earlier, can
you

explain why the Torah records these events not according
to

their chronological sequence. In your answer, relate to

strange wording in 35:22 and its thematic connection to
35:23.

 

9. Note that 36:1 begins a new unit of "toladot" (Toldot

Esav).

     Where did the last unit of "toldot" begin? (See
25:19.)

Where does it end? (Relate to 35:23-29.)

     How is the conclusion of this unit of "toldot"
different

than the conclusions of the earlier units of "toldot" in
Sefer

Breishit (i.e. how many sons are 'chosen' and who is

'rejected')?

     Explain why this observation is significant to the

overall theme of Sefer Breishit (of "bechira")?

     Why may we have thought otherwise (i.e. that not ALL
of

Yaakov's children would be chosen)?

 

PART III - PARSHANUT

 

Shalem, Shalom, Shchem

1. Read 33:18 "va'yavo Yaakov SHALEM ir Shchem..."

     a) In your opinion is "SHALEM" the NAME of the city
at

which Ya'akov arrived, or is it an ADJECTIVE describing
HOW

Yaakov arrived?  (In your answer, be sure to relate to
both

Breishit 14:18 and 28:21!)

     b) If "SHALEM" is the name of a city, then what is

"SHCHEM" the name of?

     c) If "SHALEM" implies that he "arrived safely",
would

this be proper Hebrew? Based on the context of this pasuk,
in

your opinion which explanation makes the most sense?

 

2. Now, see how the various commentators approach this

enigmatic pasuk.

     a) First, see Rashi and Ibn Ezra.  In your opinion,
which

approach is "pshat", and which is "drash"?

     b) Next, see Ramban, who quotes Rashi and Ibn Ezra,
and

argues with both of them.  In what general manner is his

pirush similar to theirs?

     c) Why do you think Ramban argues with Rashi & Ibn
Ezra?

Is his approach closer to "pshat"?

     d) Now, see Seforno. How is his explanation different

from all the above? In your opinion, is this closer to
pshat?

     e) Next, see Rashbam. How is his pirush totally

different?  (Why is Rashbam so adamant that his pirush is
the

ONLY 'real' pshat? Do you agree?)

     f) Finally see Chizkuni. Does he agree totally with

Rashbam?  What other problem does Chizkuni deal with?
[Note

how he proves that this cannot be the same city of SHALEM
as

in 14:18!]

 

3. In your opinion, why did Esav originally move from
Eretz

Canaan to Har Seir? [See 32:3, 33:14-17]

     Now, see 36:5-9!! [Compare also with 13:5-15!]

     Now, see Rashi, Rashbam, Ramban, Seforno, Radak &

Chizkuni!

     How does each "parshan" solve this problem.

     According to each, WHEN did 36:6-8 take place?

          Be sure to see Ramban inside. [It is a classic

example of     his magnificent approach to parshanut.]

 

4. Review 35:22, noting how the pasuk (and the story) end

abruptly with: "va'yishma Yisrael". In your opinion, what
does

this phrase imply, i.e. what did Yaakov 'hear', or what
did he

do?

     No matter what your answer is, why do you think that
this

pasuk is so ambiguous?

     First see Rashbam (35:22) on this phrase. Note how he

relates this pasuk to what is later written in 49:4. Can
you

explain why?  Next, see Seforno. How is his pirush
different

than Rashbam? Note as well how it is similar, in regard to
the

fact that this phrase can only be understood in light of

another pasuk in Chumash.

    Finally see Radak. Note how radical his approach is!
Note

how he relates in his pirush to Yaakov's "neder" in 28:21!
Can

you explain why? In your opinion, is Radak's
interpretation

based on that pasuk, or does that pasuk simply provide

support?

 

MAASE AVOT SIMAN LA'BANIM

1. In his introduction to the Parasha (before 32:4) -
Ramban

explains how these events relate to Jewish history.  As
your

study Ramban on chapter 32, note how he follows this
approach.

     According to this Ramban, can (or should) we apply
these

events to our decisions in later generations concerning
how to

react to provocations against the Jewish people?

     If so, are the answers 'clear-cut'; or do these
stories

help us appreciate the events after they take place?

     As you study other commentators on chapter 32, note
how

they also find parallels between these events and other
events

in Jewish history.  In what manner are their conclusions

similar to Ramban's and in what manner are they different?

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: vayishq.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 29573 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.atlchai.org/pipermail/par-reg/attachments/20101114/c9091aa9/attachment-0001.pdf 


More information about the Par-reg mailing list