[Par-reg] Pinchas - questions for self study
Menachem Leibtag
tsc at bezeqint.net
Mon Jul 9 15:10:19 EDT 2012
*********************************************
****************
THE TANACH STUDY CENTER
[http://www.tanach.org]
In Memory of Rabbi Abraham Leibtag
Shiurim in Chumash & Navi by Menachem
Leibtag
*********************************************
****************
PARSHAT PINCHAS
PART I - QUESTIONS FOR THE 'SHABBOS TABLE'
MILCHEMET MIDYAN
1. In the sin of 'bnot Mo'av' (see 25:1-9),
both the
daughters of Mo'av and Midyan participate.
Afterward, in
25:16-18, God commands Bnei Yisrael to attack
only the
Midyanites (and not Mo'av). In your opinion,
can you explain
why?
2. Why was Mo'av interested in causing Bnei
Yisrael to sin?
[Relate to 22:2-8.]
Why was Midyan interested in causing
Bnei Yisrael to sin?
[Note which of these two countries
borders with Israel.]
Whose sin would you consider worse?
[In your answer, relate to Devarim 2:9-10 &
2:17-19.]
[See also Rashi & Ramban on 25:18.]
3. When Bnei Yisrael finally go to war with
Midyan (see 31:1-
8), they send only 1,000 soldiers from each
tribe (total
12,000) and the army is led by Pinchas (the
kohen).
How is this form of going to battle
different from other
battles that Bnei Yisrael have fought thus
far (or that they
will fight in the future)? Who has led Bnei
Yisrael in battle
in their previous battles?
4. Even though we don't have exact
population figures of
Mo'av at that time, we can extrapolate a
rough estimation of
how many men there were from the number of
female children
(most likely under the age of 13) who were
taken captive =
32,000 (see 31:35). [Note also that not all
of Midyan was
destroyed. This nation appears again many
other times in
Tanach - see Shoftim chapter 6.]
Based on that figure, how many adult
males would you
estimate lived in Midyan, and hence, how
large (would you
estimate) was their army?
Based on the size of Bnei Yisrael's
potential fighting
force (i.e. 600,000 men age 20 and up), does
it make sense
that they would send a force of only 12,000
men? If not, why
do you think that this is the 'strategy' that
God commands
Moshe to follow?
5. Based on the above questions, what do you
think is
significant about 'milchemet Midyan'?
Use your answer to explain the reason
for the special tax
that was levied in 31:25-54.]
[Can you relate this as well to Moshe's
special
relationship with Midyan. Note Bamidbar
10:29-32.]
6. Is there any relationship between Midyan
and Amalek?
Relate to Bil'am's final blessings in
Bamidbar 24:20-25
& Sefer Shoftim 4:11,17-20. [See also
Breishit 25:1-6.]
NUMBERS
7. As long as we are dealing with numbers
[in the 'Book of
Numbers'], what is the population drop in
Shevet Shimon
between the census in Bamidbar chapter 1 and
chapter 26? Is
there any other shevet in which we find such
a drastic drop?
Can you relate this to 25:14 and 25:9?!
Does Shimon receive a blessing from
Moshe Rabeinu in
Parshat Ve-zot Ha-Bracha (Devarim chapter
33)? If so, what is
it? If not, why not? Is there any other
'shevet' that had
such a significant drop in population?
=============
PART II - QUESTIONS FOR PREPARATION (for
weekly shiur)
SHIUR #1 - THE ORDER OF PARSHIOT IN SEFER
BAMIDBAR
1. Chapter 26 describes a 'mifkad' [census]
of the twelve
tribes. To the best of your recollection,
what was the
purpose of this census. In your answer,
relate to:
a) your 'first impression' - when reading
26:1-4 as a
continuation of 25:16-18.
b) its juxtaposition to the opening
sentence - "And it came
to pass after the plague... (i.e. 26:1)
c) the final psukim of this census in
26:51-56!
d) what transpires in chapter 27.
Rashi on 26:1 quotes two different
Midrashim that relate to
the purpose of this census. How do these two
interpretations
relate to your answer to the above question?
Which of the
above possibilities does he relate to?
See also Chizkuni & Ibn Ezra in regard
to this topic.
2. Carefully compare the 'style' of this
census (i.e. how the
people are counted by families) to the census
in the first
chapter of Sefer Bamidbar. What is the
primary difference
between them?
As you review Bamidbar chapter one, note
also what takes
place in Bamidbar chapter 2. Is there
anything similar to
this in chapter 26?
Based on your comparison:
What was the purpose of the census in
Bamidbar 1-2?
What is the purpose of the new census in
Bamidbar 26?
Does your answer explain the reason for
the differences?
3. In 25:16-18, God commands Bnei Yisrael to
attack Midyan.
Where in Sefer Bamidbar do we find the actual
details of this
battle?
Can you explain why the details of that
battle are not
recorded until chapter 31?
[See Chizkuni on 25:17. How does he
'solve' this
problem?
See also Ramban on 25:17. How is his
peirush different?]
4. Carefully review the primary topics of
each of the
individual parshiot that are recorded between
chapters 25 and
31. It would be helpful to list them, and
attempt to group
them together by common topics.
Note how these parshiot appear to form
an 'interruption'
of the narrative that otherwise would flow
naturally from 26:1
to chapter 31. Can you explain the reason
for this structure?
5. In your opinion, where in Chumash does
27:12-23 belong?
Can you explain why this narrative is
recorded at this point
in Sefer Bamidbar?
Compare 27:12-13 to 31:1-2. What can we
assume from this
in regard to the chronological order of these
events?
6. What was your conclusion in regard to the
primary topic of
chapters 28-29? In your opinion, does this
unit belong in
Sefer Bamidbar? If not, where does it belong
(and why)?
7. Continue your review (or 'scan') of Sefer
Bamidbar until
its conclusion in chapter 36. As before,
make a listing of
all the primary topics of each parshia (or
set of parshiot);
this time listing from chapter 25 until the
end.
Study this list, and attempt to
're-organize' these
parshiot (i.e. from chapter 25 until chapter
36) in a more
'logical' order.
Would you consider chapters 26-27 as one
unit? If so,
why?
In your opinion, where does this
unit belong?
Can you explain why the Torah places it
after chapter 25?
Read Rashi on 26:1 once again?
Explain the two answers that Rashi
suggests based on the
above analysis. See also Chizkuni.
8. Based on your answers to the above, what
can we learn from
the 'parshia break' that we find in the
middle of 26:1?
9. Review Devarim 4:3-4, noting its specific
context within
the opening topic of chapter 4. [Btw, do
these psukim sound
familiar? How did you understand them up
until now?]
Can you relate Devarim 4:3-4 to the
events of Bamidbar
chapter 25? Can you explain why Moshe
mentions specifically
'ba'al pe'or' in this rebuke?
After that event, do we find any other
instance when Bnei
Yisrael sin in the desert (or when they are
punished)?
Attempt to this relate to the overall
theme of Sefer
Bamidbar (and the above questions)?
=====
SHIUR #2 - PARSHAT TMIDIM U-MUSSAFIM -
[ITS INTERNAL STRUCTURE]
1. Chapters 28-29 form a unit. Explain why
(both textually
and thematically), and give a title to this
unit based on its
content.
Would the heading: 'The Jewish Holidays'
- be a precise
title for this unit? Explain why yes, and why
not.
Does your title of this unit explain the
reason for the
repetition of the phrase 'milvad olat
ha-tamid...' in each
holiday? [If it doesn't, it should.]
What does the word 'mussaf' mean? Did
you include it in
your title?
When we daven 'tfillat mussaf', do we
ever quote the
psukim from Parshat Pinchas? If so, when,
where, and why?
When we read the Torah on Yom Tov, do we
ever read from
Parshat Pinchas? If so, for which aliya?
Can you explain why?
2. How does this unit relate to Vayikra
chapter 23?
Is it simply a repeat? If not,
what it the
difference?
Be sure that you relate to the phrase
've-hikravtem isheh
la-Hashem' that is repeated so often in
chapter 23. Relate as
well to Vayikra 23:37-38 - See Rashi on that
pasuk!
[See also TSC shiur on Parshat Emor re:
the "moadim".]
3. Based on Bamidbar chapters 28-29, compose
a table that
lists (and compares) the specific animals
(and their numbers)
that are offered on each holiday. Can you
identify any type
of a 'pattern'?
If so, based on that pattern, attempt to
group the
holidays together based on their similar
'korbanot'. Can you
find a reason for the groupings that emerge?
According to these groupings, should
Shmini Atzeret be
considered one of the 'shalosh regalim' or
one of the 'Days of
Judgement'?
4. In your opinion, should the special
Mussaf offering of
Rosh Chodesh be offered on Rosh Hashana as
well, or does the
special Mussaf offering of Rosh Hashana
'override' it?
Now, look at the parsha carefully, and
see if you arrived
at the same conclusion that Chumash does (i.e
make sure that
you study 29:6 in its context)!
========
PART III - PARSHANUT
1. Review the opening four psukim of Parshat
Pinchas (i.e.
25:10-13). In your opinion, does 25:13
'explain' 25:12, or
does God grant Pinchas an 'additional' reward
in 25:13?
Can you explain the difference between
the award of 'brit
shalom' in 25:12 to the award of 'brit
kehunat olam' in 25:13?
In your opinion, are these two britot
identical or are
they different?
If they are different, what does brit
shalom imply?
After you have thought about this, see:
* Rashi 25:12-13 - How does Rashi answer
the above
question?
* Ramban 25:11-13. This Ramban is very
difficult, how does
he explain the difference between the two
britot?
* Ibn Ezra 25:12-13 - How does Ibn Ezra
answer the
above...?
[See also Chizkuni - is this the
same as Ibn Ezra?
Why does he add the law about
birkat kohanim?
* Sforno 25:12 / Clearly, he understands
brit shalom in a
very different manner. Can you explain why?
What does he
base his interpretation on?
Then, see once again the Ibn Ezra on 25:13.
How and why
does he argue with Sforno's approach?
2. Note the word 'shalom' in birkat kohanim
(Bamidbar 6:26).
If I am not mistaken, these are the only
two instances in
Sefer Bamidbar where we find the word shalom.
[E-mail me if
you find another].
Could this parallel help us understand
the connection
between brit shalom and brit kehunat olam?
Would this imply
that brit shalom is the same as brit kehuna?
3. In Sefer Breishit we discussed two
approaches to the
concept of brit - a) a one sided covenant,
basically a Divine
promise;
b) a two sided covenant, which
binds both sides.
[See Ramban Breishit 6:18 for complete
discussion.]
In your opinion, what of these two types
would you consider
God's covenant with Pinchas?
Based on his commentary on Breishit
6:18, attempt to
better understand Ramban's commentary on
Bamidbar 25:13.
[Using the Ramban's own words,
've-hamaskil yavin'!]
How does the zealous nature of the act
of Pinchas relate
to the biblical concept of kehuna? [Relate
to Shmot 19:4-6.]
4. In relation to question #1 in 'shabbos
table questions' -
be sure to see Rashi & Ramban on 25:18
concerning why only
Midyan is attacked [and not Mo'av].
Does Ramban argue with Rashi, or does
his interpretation
'add' to Rashi's explanation? Explain!
Now see Chizkuni on 25:18. What does
his peirush add?
Which problem in 'pshat' does Chizkuni's
peirush answer?
5. In regard to the 'strange' progression of
parshiot in
Parshat Pinchas (as discussed in Part II
above) - Note how the
following parshanim relate to these problems
of 'smichut
parshiot'!
Rashi on 27:12. See also Ibn Ezra.
Relate to Rashi's two 'meshalim' in
his peirush to
26:1!
See also Chizkuni on 27:12. Can you
explain his peirush?
Finally see Ramban on 27:12. How is his
peirush here
affected by his opinion of 'yeish mukdam
u-me'uchar'?!
6. In regard to why Parshat Tmidim
u-Mussafim is recorded
here:
See Rashi, Ibn Ezra, and Ramban on 28:2.
Explain how (and why) each
commentary is different.
be-hatzlacha,
menachem
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: pinq.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 29907 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.atlchai.org/pipermail/par-reg/attachments/20120709/6ecaa4d2/attachment-0001.pdf
More information about the Par-reg
mailing list