[Par-reg] Vayishlach - questions for self study

Menachem Leibtag tsc at bezeqint.net
Sun Nov 25 12:47:13 EST 2012


Dedicated in Commemoration of the Yarzeit of 

  Reuven Ben Moshe A"H   -  17 kislev 5757  -


 

 

*********************************************
****************

     THE TANACH STUDY CENTER
[http://www.tanach.org]

          In Memory of Rabbi Abraham Leibtag

     Shiurim in Chumash & Navi by Menachem
Leibtag

*********************************************
****************

 

                     PARSHAT  VA'YISHLACH

 

PART I - QUESTIONS FOR THE 'SHABBOS TABLE'

 

'TRICKERY' IN YAAKOV AVINU'S LIFE

1.  Review the various stories about Yaakov
Avinu in Parshiot

Toldot and Va'yetze, noting almost each one
involves some sort

of "trickery".  [Note when Yaakov uses
trickery, and when

trickery is used against Yaakov.]

     a) Can you discern a pattern?

     b) In each of these stories, can the
trickery be

justified?

     c) In your opinion, is Yaakov Avinu
later 'punished' for

this trickery? If so, when and how?

     d) In your opinion, [if he indeed is
later punished for

this trickery] does this necessarily imply
that Yaakov was

'wrong' in his actions? Explain!

 

2. Next, review the beginning of Parshat
Vayishlach (32:4-

32:25), noting how Yaakov prepares for his
confrontation with

Esav by telling his messengers not only to
present a gift, but

also to inform Esav that he [Yaakov] will be
coming

'momentarily'.  [To verify this, carefully
review 32:18-22!]

     Try to explain as well why Yaakov finds
it necessary to

leave 'gaps' between each flock that he
sends.

     In your opinion, does Yaakov truly plan
to confront Esav,

or is his plan a 'stall' to allow him extra
time to 'run-

away'.  Base your answer on the other actions
that Yaakov

takes, as well as to the fears that he
expresses in his prayer

(to which God does not seem to provide an
immediate reply)!

     In your opinion, is Yaakov using
trickery (once again) in

an attempt to run away from his brother, or
does he truly plan

to confront him?

     Then, review 32:24 (i.e. when Yaakov
crosses the Yakok

stream).  In your opinion, is Yaakov crossing
that stream to

meet Esav or to run away from him?  Now, see
Rashbam on 32:23!

[See other commentators as well (who
disagree).]

 

3.  Based on your answer to the above
question, attempt to

explain the deeper meaning of Yaakov's
struggle with the

"malach" (see 32:24-30), i.e. why does God
send someone to

wrestle with him.  In you answer, relate as
well to the

blessing that Yaakov receives in the
aftermath of that

struggle.

     Who does Yaakov meet immediately after
this struggle is

over, and what does he do (see 33:1-3)?
Relate this fact to

your answer to the above questions!

     Based on the above questions, suggest a
possible meaning

for Yaakov's name change to Yisrael in the
aftermath of this

incident.

 

THE SHOWDOWN WITH ESAV

4. In your opinion, when Esav first left to
meet Yaakov (see

32:6), was his original intention to fight
against Yaakov, or

did he just want to greet him? In your
answer, relate to

33:1-17, especially 33:4. Relate also to
27:41-45.

     Now see Rashi on 33:4 and then Ibn Ezra!
[Note Seforno

and Radak as well on 33:4.]  Can you explain
the reason for

these different approaches to this 'open
question'?

 

5.  In your opinion, was it proper for Yaakov
to bow down

seven times in front of Esav?  Was he simply
trying to appease

Esav, or was this an attempt to indicate
something more

significant?

     Relate to 27:28-29, and see Ramban on
32:4 (and Radak).

          [See also Rashbam on 32:29 and
Chizkuni on 32:5.]

     Finally, see Maharam on 32:5 (in Torat
Chaim edition).

['Right wingers' will probably enjoy this
commentary (at least

more than Ramban's).]

 

PART II - QUESTIONS FOR PREPARATION (for
weekly shiur)

 

For Shiur #1 -  FROM YAAKOV TO YISRAEL

  [Note: It would be helpful to answer the
above 'Questions

  for the shabbos table' as additional
preparation for this

  shiur.]

1.  Recall how Parshat Va'yetze concluded
with Yaakov meeting

the "maalachei Elokim" [angels of God] - see
32:1-3.  In your

opinion, did this have any affect on his
decision to send

messengers to meet Esav (see 32:4-5).

     In your answer, relate to the angels
that Yaakov first

saw in Bet El before leaving Eretz Canaan,
and God's promise

to him at that time (see 28:12-15).  Relate
as well to why

Yaakov had to run away in the first place,
and for how long

his mother told him that he should stay away
for (see 27:41-

45).

     In your opinion, does Yaakov expect to
find that Esav

still wants to kill him, or does he think
that Esav is no

longer so angry?

 

2.  Next, review 32:9-12 - i.e. Yaakov's
prayer that God save

him from Esav - noting how he recalls several
earlier promises

that God had made. How does this prayer
relate to his original

assumption regarding Esav and the report he
received from his

messengers that Esav is approaching with four
hundred men?

     Try to find the 'sources' (in Chumash)
for what Yaakov

mentions in 32:9 and 32:12.  Can you explain
why Yaakov chose

to relate to specifically these promises in
his prayer? (Be

sure to relate to 22:15-18.)

 

3.  Does God answer Yaakov's prayer?  If so,
when; and in what

manner?

     It appears that God did not provide
Yaakov with an

immediate answer to this prayer. In your
opinion, did this

affect (in any manner) Yaakov's plan for
confronting (or

running away) from Esav?  If so, explain how.

 

4. Based on everything that Yaakov does
between 32:4 and

32:23, how does Yaakov plan to save his
family?

     Note how the next event is his struggle
in 32:24-30.  In

your opinion, was this confrontation simply
'incidental', or

did God send this person?  If the latter, can
you suggest a

reason why?  Relate your reason to the above
questions.

 

5.  At the end of this struggle, Yaakov asks
for a blessing,

and the angel changes his name from Yaakov to
Yisrael (see

32:28).  Attempt to relate this name change
to all the

previous events.  Explain as well why this
should be

considered a 'blessing'!

 

6. In what manner is Yaakov's name change to
Yisrael different

than Avram's name change to AvraHam?  [Be
sure to note at

least two distinctions.]

     Based on your answer, why do you think
that Yaakov

continues to be called Yaakov, even after
this name change?

Relate you answer to the above questions.

     In your opinion, what does each name
represent?

     See the commentaries of Ibn Ezra,
Rashbam, and Chizkuni

on 35:10, noting how they relate to this
question.

 

7. Review 35:9-16, noting how we find once
again that Yaakov's

name is changed to Yisrael.  In your opinion,
does the story

in 25:9-16 CONTRADICT the story in 32:27-29?
Or, is this

simply a REPETITION, or possibly a
CONFIRMATION, or maybe an

ADDITION?  Explain.

     Next, review 28:3-4, i.e. Yitzchak's
blessing to Yaakov

before he first left Eretz Canaan, noting the
purpose of that

blessing as well as God's Name [i.e. Elokim]
that Yitzchak

invokes at that time.   In what manner is
that blessing

similar to the blessing that Yaakov receives
from God at this

time?  Can you explain why?

 

8.  If you follow the commentaries of Ramban
and Seforno in

chapter 32, you'll notice how they find
numerous parallels

between these events in Yaakov's life and the
history of Am

Yisrael.  Can you explain what leads them to
this conclusion?

 

For Shiur #2 - WHEN DOES YAAKOV RETURN TO BET
EL?

1.  In your opinion, how much time elapses
between the events

recorded in 32:27-29, and those recorded in
35:9-15? [Or at

least what events took place in the interim?]
How would this

affect your understanding of the connection
between these two

events?

 

2.  Recall that Yaakov had made a "neder"
before his departure

to Padan Aram (see 28:18-22).

    Based on that promise, what would you
expect Yaakov to do

immediately upon his return to Eretz Canaan?

     Does he do fulfill that promise?  If so,
when, and why

then?  If not, can you explain why he
doesn't?

 

3. Review 30:25, 31:1-3, 31:13, 31:18.  Based
on those psukim,

would you expect Yaakov to return immediately
upon his arrival

to his father and/or to Bet-El?

     Can you explain why he doesn't?

 

4. Make a list of all of the events that take
place in Parshat

Va'yishlach. As you do so, make special note
of its division

into 'parshiot'.  Attempt to determine the
amount of time that

elapses from one event to the next.  In your
opinion, does the

progression of these events make sense?

 

5.  Based on 31:41, 29:20-32, and 31:23,
approximately how old

are Yaakov's children when he first returns
to Eretz Canaan?

How old is Dina (maximum)?  How old are Levi
& Shimon?

     When you read the story about Dina and
Shchem in chapter

34, how old do Dina, Shimon & Levi seem to be
during this

incident?  Based on the above, attempt to
reach a conclusion

concerning how many years elapsed between
Yaakov's arrival at

Shchem and the incident with Dina?

 

6.  In your opinion, does it make sense that
until that time

he had never yet gone to visit his father, or
to fulfill his

"neder" at Bet-el?  If he did, then why does
the text not

indicate so?  If he had not, can you explain
why he didn't?

 

7. Read 35:1-8 carefully, noting how it forms
its own

"parshia" (and hence it is separate from
35:9-22).

     What is the thematic connection between
35:1-8 and the

story of 'Dina & Shchem' in chapter 34? Could
it be considered

part of the same story?

     Note carefully why God instructs Yaakov
to go to Bet-el

in 35:1-3, i.e. for what purpose.  Is there a
precedent for

this purpose at this site of Bet El?  Does
this relate in any

manner to Yaakov's "neder" in 28:15-22?

     Review once again 35:1-8, noting the
"mizbayach" that

Yaakov builds and its purpose.  Does this
relate in any manner

to his "neder"? If so, explain how; if not
explain why it

doesn't - and why he does build this
mizbayach.

 

8. Now read 35:9-22 carefully.  Does it make
sense that this

story takes place immediately afterward (i.e.
after 35:1-8),

or could one entertain the possibility that
it took place much

earlier?

     In answer, relate to the textual
parallels between 35:9

and 33:18 -"b'vo'oh m'Padan Aram...".   If
so, what problems

raised above (regarding the story of Dina in
Shchem) would be

solved?

     If this 'parshia' indeed did take place
earlier, can you

explain why the Torah records these events
not according to

their chronological sequence. In your answer,
relate to

strange wording in 35:22 and its thematic
connection to 35:23.

 

9. Note that 36:1 begins a new unit of
"toladot" (Toldot

Esav).

     Where did the last unit of "toldot"
begin? (See 25:19.)

Where does it end? (Relate to 35:23-29.)

     How is the conclusion of this unit of
"toldot" different

than the conclusions of the earlier units of
"toldot" in Sefer

Breishit (i.e. how many sons are 'chosen' and
who is

'rejected')?

     Explain why this observation is
significant to the

overall theme of Sefer Breishit (of
"bechira")?

     Why may we have thought otherwise (i.e.
that not ALL of

Yaakov's children would be chosen)?

 

PART III - PARSHANUT

 

Shalem, Shalom, Shchem

1. Read 33:18 "va'yavo Yaakov SHALEM ir
Shchem..."

     a) In your opinion is "SHALEM" the NAME
of the city at

which Ya'akov arrived, or is it an ADJECTIVE
describing HOW

Yaakov arrived?  (In your answer, be sure to
relate to both

Breishit 14:18 and 28:21!)

     b) If "SHALEM" is the name of a city,
then what is

"SHCHEM" the name of?

     c) If "SHALEM" implies that he "arrived
safely", would

this be proper Hebrew? Based on the context
of this pasuk, in

your opinion which explanation makes the most
sense?

 

2. Now, see how the various commentators
approach this

enigmatic pasuk.

     a) First, see Rashi and Ibn Ezra.  In
your opinion, which

approach is "pshat", and which is "drash"?

     b) Next, see Ramban, who quotes Rashi
and Ibn Ezra, and

argues with both of them.  In what general
manner is his

pirush similar to theirs?

     c) Why do you think Ramban argues with
Rashi & Ibn Ezra?

Is his approach closer to "pshat"?

     d) Now, see Seforno. How is his
explanation different

from all the above? In your opinion, is this
closer to pshat?

     e) Next, see Rashbam. How is his pirush
totally

different?  (Why is Rashbam so adamant that
his pirush is the

ONLY 'real' pshat? Do you agree?)

     f) Finally see Chizkuni. Does he agree
totally with

Rashbam?  What other problem does Chizkuni
deal with?  [Note

how he proves that this cannot be the same
city of SHALEM as

in 14:18!]

 

3. In your opinion, why did Esav originally
move from Eretz

Canaan to Har Seir? [See 32:3, 33:14-17]

     Now, see 36:5-9!! [Compare also with
13:5-15!]

     Now, see Rashi, Rashbam, Ramban,
Seforno, Radak &

Chizkuni!

     How does each "parshan" solve this
problem.

     According to each, WHEN did 36:6-8 take
place?

          Be sure to see Ramban inside. [It
is a classic

example of     his magnificent approach to
parshanut.]

 

4. Review 35:22, noting how the pasuk (and
the story) end

abruptly with: "va'yishma Yisrael". In your
opinion, what does

this phrase imply, i.e. what did Yaakov
'hear', or what did he

do?

     No matter what your answer is, why do
you think that this

pasuk is so ambiguous?

     First see Rashbam (35:22) on this
phrase. Note how he

relates this pasuk to what is later written
in 49:4. Can you

explain why?  Next, see Seforno. How is his
pirush different

than Rashbam? Note as well how it is similar,
in regard to the

fact that this phrase can only be understood
in light of

another pasuk in Chumash.

    Finally see Radak. Note how radical his
approach is! Note

how he relates in his pirush to Yaakov's
"neder" in 28:21! Can

you explain why? In your opinion, is Radak's
interpretation

based on that pasuk, or does that pasuk
simply provide

support?

 

MAASE AVOT SIMAN LA'BANIM

1. In his introduction to the Parasha (before
32:4) - Ramban

explains how these events relate to Jewish
history.  As your

study Ramban on chapter 32, note how he
follows this approach.

     According to this Ramban, can (or
should) we apply these

events to our decisions in later generations
concerning how to

react to provocations against the Jewish
people?

     If so, are the answers 'clear-cut'; or
do these stories

help us appreciate the events after they take
place?

     As you study other commentators on
chapter 32, note how

they also find parallels between these events
and other events

in Jewish history.  In what manner are their
conclusions

similar to Ramban's and in what manner are
they different?

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.atlchai.org/pipermail/par-reg/attachments/20121125/82a66f58/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: vayishq.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 29573 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.atlchai.org/pipermail/par-reg/attachments/20121125/82a66f58/attachment-0001.pdf>


More information about the Par-reg mailing list