[Par-reg] for Parshat Vayishlach - additional shiur

Menachem Leibtag tsc at bezeqint.net
Thu Nov 14 17:23:59 EST 2013


*********************************************
****************

     THE TANACH STUDY CENTER
[http://www.tanach.org]

          In Memory of Rabbi Abraham Leibtag

     Shiurim in Chumash & Navi by Menachem
Leibtag

*********************************************
****************

 

          for PARSHAT  VAYISHLACH -

 

        FROM YAAKOV TO YISRAEL - part two

 

     There must be something important about
names in Parshat

Vayishlach, for we find that Yaakov's name is
changed to

Yisrael; and it happens twice!

     In the following shiur, we attempt to
understand why, by

considering its connection to the theme of
'bechira' in Sefer

Breishit.

 

INTRODUCTION

     Yaakov's name change to Yisrael is very
different than

Avram's name change to Avraham.  In regard to
AvraHAm - a

single letter ["heh"] is added to his
existing name (see 17:1-

5); in contrast - Yisrael  constitutes an
entirely new name.

Furthermore, Yisrael serves as an alternate
name for Yaakov,

while the name Avraham serves as a
replacement.

     What is even more peculiar about
Yaakov's name change -

is that it happens twice:

  Once, in the aftermath of his struggle at
Pni'el, prior to

  his confrontation with Eisav (see
32:24-30);

     And later, at God's revelation to him at
Bet El (see

35:9-13).

 

  With this in mind, we begin our study with
a comparison of

those two stories; afterward, we will discuss
why Yaakov's

name change is both similar and different
than Avraham's.

 

YAAKOV'S RETURN TO BET EL

  Let's begin our discussion with the second
time when

Yaakov's name is changed to Yisrael; for it
contains some

rather obvious textual parallels to the key
psukim that

describe how Avraham Avinu was first chosen.
Those parallels

will help us understand how his name change
relates to a key

stage in the bechira process.  Our
conclusions will then help

us appreciate the meaning of the first time
Yaakov's name in

changed, i.e. the site of Pni'el.

 

     Yaakov's return to Bet El, as described
in 35:9-15, could

be considered as the prophetic 'highlight' of
his return to

Eretz Canaan.  Recall that this it was at
this very site where

God first appeared to him, promising him that
he was indeed

the 'chosen' son (see 28:12-14).
Furthermore, it was at Bet-

El where God had promised to look after his
needs during his

journey to (and stay in) Charan.

  [Recall as well from our shiur on Parshat
Lech Lecha that

  Bet El was also the focal point of
Avraham's 'aliya', where

  he built a mizbeiach and 'called out in
God's Name'.]

 

     Let's take a look at the Torah's
description of this

'hitgalut', noting how God not only confirms
Yaakov's bechira

but also changes his name to Yisrael:

  "And God appeared again to Yaakov on his
arrival from Padan

  Aram, and blessed him: You, whose name is
Yaakov, shall be

  called Yaakov no more, but Yisrael shall be
your name.

    Thus He named him Yisrael, and God said
to him: I am Kel

  Shakai, be fertile and increase... The land
that I have

  given to Avraham and Yitzchak I give to you
and to your

  offspring to come...   (35:9-16).

 

     God's confirmation of 'zera' [offspring]
and 'aretz' (the

Land) echoes His numerous earlier blessings
of'bechira to

Avraham and Yitzchak.  [See 12:1-7, 13:14-16,
15:18, 17:7-8,

26:1-5, 28:13.]  In fact, these seem to be
the key two words

in just about every higtalut when God discuss
any aspect of

the 'bechira' process with the avot.

  However, this particular blessing carries
additional

significance, for it is the last time that we
find it in Sefer

Breishit, thus suggesting that the bechira
process has finally

come to an end!

     Therefore, the fact that this blessing
also includes

Yaakov's name change to Yisrael suggests a
thematic connection

between this name change and the conclusion
of the bechira

process!

     If indeed the 'filtering' stage of the
bechira process is

finally over, then this name change reflects
the fact that now

all of Yaakov's children (and grandchildren
etc.) are chosen.

  [In contrast to the children of Avraham and
Yitzchak, where

  only one child was chosen.]

  

  In other words, from this point onward, all
the children of

Yaakov will become the nation of Israel- and
hence the name

change to Yisrael.

     With this in mind, let's discuss the
incident at Peniel,

when his name is first changed to Yisrael -
to appreciate the

thematic significance of specifically this
name - i.e.

Yisrael.

 

THE EVENTS BEFORE THE STRUGGLE

     Even though the Torah only tells us that
a 'man' ['ish']

struggles with Yaakov at Peniel (see 32:25),
the continuation

of this story [when this 'man' blesses Yaakov
etc / see 32:26-

30)] certainly supports the Midrashic
interpretation that he

was the 'angelic minister of Eisav' -
intentionally sent by

God to confront Yaakov.

  [Note that the Hebrew word ish is often
used to describe an

  important and/or powerful man, and not only
the male gender

  / see Shmot 2:12 & Bamidbar 13:3.]

 

  But why would God send this ish at this
critical time?

  To appreciate why, we must consider the
events in the life

of Yaakov that lead up to this final
'showdown' with Eisav.

     1.  Yaakov, using 'trickery', buys the
'bechora' from

Eisav.

     2. Yitzchak plans to bless Eisav with
prosperity and

power;.

          using 'trickery', Yaakov 'steals'
that blessing..

     3. Yaakov must 'run away' to Padan Aram
(in fear of

Eisav).

     4. Yaakov spends twenty years with
Lavan;

    often suffering from Lavan's
'trickiness'.

     5. Yaakov 'runs away' from Padan Aram
(in fear of Lavan).

    6. Yaakov prepares for his confrontation
with Eisav.

          [Note how he plans a total
subjugation to his

brother.]

     7. God sends an ish to confront Yaakov.

 

     While reviewing this progression, note
how Yaakov's life

was replete with a need to either employ
trickery or 'run

away' in order to either survive, or to
attain what he felt

was necessary (to become the 'chosen son').
Indeed, Yaakov

had become an expert at survival; but appears
to have lacked

experience in 'frontal combat' - a trait that
Eisav was best

at.

     As we explained in our shiur on Parshat
Toldot, it may

have been for this very reason that Yitzchak
had originally

intended to bless Eisav, for he understood
that in order to

establish a nation, the traits of an 'ish
sadeh' are

essential, i.e. the qualities necessary to
provide leadership

in worldly matters.  In contrast to his
brother, Yaakov, the

'ish tam', certainly lacked this character.

     However, now that it had been divinely
determined that

Yaakov was to be the only chosen son, one
could suggest that

God found it necessary for Yaakov himself to
develop those

traits as well.

     This may explain why upon his return to
Eretz Canaan, God

intentionally initiates a direct
confrontation between Yaakov

and Eisav.  [Recall from the fact that Rivka
never sent for

him, it may be that Eisav is indeed still
planning to take

revenge.]

 

  However, when we analyze Yaakov's apparent
strategy - as he

prepares to meet Eisav (see 32:13-21), we
find once again that

he was not quite ready for this direct
confrontation.

     One could even suggest (as Rashbam
does), that Yaakov's

original plan was to run away from Eisav,
taking his own

family in one direction, while sending
several 'staged'

messengers to Eisav as a decoy to 'slow his
advance'!  If so,

then God's purpose in sending this ish to
struggle with

Yaakov, was to stop him from running away -
stalling his

retreat until Eisav arrives.

  And when Yaakov does see Eisav at dawn
(after his struggle

with the 'ish'), again he plans
'capitulation' - bowing down

profusely before his brother - showing him
that in reality, he

never received the blessing that he had tried
to steal.

  [By bowing down to Eisav, Yaakov wishes to
show his brother

  that the 'stolen blessing' of power and
dominion over his

  brother ("hevei gvir le-achecha,
yishtachavu lecha bnei

  imecha...27:29) was indeed awarded to
Eisav.  Ironically,

  Yaakov resorts to trickery once again; this
time to show his

  brother that his original trickery used to
'steal' the

  brachot was meaningless.]

 

REALISM OR LAZINESS

     Note how Yaakov's struggle with the ish
takes place at a

very critical point in his life; i.e. after
his preparation to

bow down to (or run away from) Eisav, but
before the actual

confrontation.  Let's explain why this may be
significant.

     A controversy exists among the
commentators as to whether

Yaakov was correct in this total subjugation
to his brother.

Some hold that Yaakov should have openly
confronted his

brother while putting his total faith in God
(see Rashbam on

32:29), while others maintain that due to the
circumstances,

his timid strategy was appropriate (see
Seforno on 33:4).

[Note how this 'hashkafic' controversy
continues until this

very day!]

     Regardless of the 'political
correctness' of his actions,

the situation remains that Yaakov is unable
to openly confront

Eisav.  Nevertheless, God finds it necessary
that Yaakov prove

himself capable of fighting, should such a
situation arise in

the future.  Yaakov must now demonstrate that
his subjugation

to Eisav stems from political realism rather
than spiritual

laziness.  He must prove that, when
necessary, he will be

capable of fighting.

  [Sooner or later in Jewish history,
confrontations with the

  likes of Eisav will be encountered when
establishing a

  nation.]

 

     Possibly for this reason, God must first
'test' Yaakov's

potential to engage in battle with his enemy
before he meets

Eisav.  Yaakov finds this struggle difficult,
for he is

untrained; the contest continues all night
until the 'break of

dawn'.  [Possibly, night represents 'galut';
'dawn'

redemption.  See Ramban 'al atar'.]  Although
wounded and

limping, Yaakov emerges victorious from this
confrontation,

thus earning his new name:

  "Your name shall no longer be Yaakov, but
Yisrael, for you

  have fought with beings divine ('Elokim')
and human

  ('anashim') and triumphed" (32:29).

 

  Thus, the name Yisrael may reflect the
character of one

triumphant in battle.  Yaakov's new name is
significant for it

reflects his capability to engage head on in
battle.  In order

to become a nation, this trait - represented
by the name

'Yisrael' - is crucial.

  Yet his name also remains Yaakov, for there
may be times as

well when 'passiveness' will be the proper
avenue.

 

WHY TWICE?

     For some reaons, receiving this 'new
name' from this

mal'ach did not appear to be sufficient; for
God Himself found

it necessary to later confirm that name -
Yisrael, together

with his bechira, at Bet El (the very site
where he was first

promised the bechira).  Thus, it appears as
though the

blessings that Yaakov received throughout
that entire episode

of his trickery must now be bestowed upon him
properly (and

formally).

  First, God names Yaakov - 'Yisrael',
symbolizing the traits

of worldly leadership (see 35:9- 10).
Afterwards, God

confirms the blessing that Yitzchak had given
him (see 25:11-

12 / compare with 28:1-4).

 

     Note the obvious parallel between these
two blessings:

     

 FROM YITZCHAK (before departing) /   FROM
GOD (upon arriving)

              (28:3-4)
(35:11-12)

      =================
===============

      

May "kel Shakai" bless you,        I am 'kel
Shakai':

make you fertile and multiply,     Be fertile
and multiply,

to become an assembly of peoples   An
assembly of nations

May He grant you the -             shall
descend from you...

     blessing of Avraham           The Land
I gave Avraham...

to you and your offspring         .to you and
to your offspring

that you may possess the Land      to come, I
assign the Land.

 

     This comparison clearly shows that God's
blessing to

Yaakov at Bet El constitutes a confirmation
of Yitzchak's

blessing to him after the incident of the
stolen brachot.

Hence, we may conclude that the name of
Yisrael marks the

conclusion of the bechira process, as
includes the necessary

character that Am Yisrael will require to
later become God's

special nation.

 

THE FUTURE

     Although Yaakov's worldly traits may lie
dormant for

several generations, it must be inherent to
his character

before his bechira receives final Divine
confirmation.

[Later, Yaakov will bless his two most able
sons, Yehuda and

Yosef, with the leadership in this realm (see
49:8-26).]

     Throughout the rest of Chumash, the name
Yaakov

interchanges with Yisrael.  This suggests
that each name

reflects a different aspect of his character.
There are times

when 'Am Yisrael' must act as Yaakov, the ish
tam, and there

are times when the more active and
nationalistic

characteristics of Yisrael must be employed.
Ultimately, as

the prophet Ovadia proclaims, the day will
come when:

  "Liberators shall march up on Har Zion to
wreak judgement on

  Har Eisav; and the kingdom shall be that of
God" (1:21).

 

     Based on this understanding of the
significance of the

special name of Yisrael, one could suggest a
reason for the

necessity of the 'bechira' process to
continue one generation

past Yitzchak.  [Or re-phrased, why was it
necessary for Eisav

to be rejected, given the importance of his
worldly traits?]

     Our original assumption, that both the
traits of an ish

sadeh and an ish tam are necessary in order
to establish a

nation, remains correct.  Nevertheless, it is
important that

they are not perceived as equally important.
As we explained

in our shiur on Parshat Toldot, the
fundamental character of

Am Yisrael must be that of an ish tam
(Yaakov).  Only once

that characteristic becomes rooted, the
traits of an ish sadeh

can be added.  Had Eisav been included in Am
Yisrael, our

perception of the relative importance of an
ish sadeh may have

become distorted.  A disproportionate
emphasis on

'nationalism' and strength - despite their
importance - would

have tainted mankind's perception of God's
special nation.

 

     In the formative stage of our national
development, our

outward appearance as 'Yisrael' must stem
from our inner

character as 'Yaakov'.  We must first speak
with the 'voice of

Yaakov' (see Rashi 27:22), only then may we
don the 'hands of

Eisav'.

 

                                   shabbat
shalom

                                   menachem

 

======================

FOR FURTHER IYUN

 

A.  There is a Midrash telling us 'Yaakov
avinu lo met' -

Yaakov never died.  Relate this Midrash to
the fact that the

bechira process concludes with Yaakov, and
that all of his

offspring have been chosen.  Relate this also
to 49:33 in

comparison to 35:29 and 25:8.

 

B.  TOLDOT EISAV

     Yitzchak was chosen.  Therefore, we need
to follow the

toldot of Eisav, just as we needed to follow
the toldot of

Yishmael & Lot.

  Based on this assumption, explain perek 36.

  Based on the above shiur, why do you think
there is an

emphasis on the kings who ruled in Edom
before a king ruled

over Bnei Yisrael (see 36:31)!

 

C.  BRIT MILA & GOD'S BLESSING TO YAAKOV

     A quick analysis of God's final blessing
to Yaakov at Bet

El (35:9-15) immediately shows that it is
reflective of brit

mila (Breishit perek 17).  The name of Kel
Shakai; 'pru u-

revu'; 'kehal goyim & melachim'; 'shem
Elokim'; and the

concept of 'lihiyot lecha le-Elokim' can all
be found at brit

mila.  Note that the bracha of brit mila
which began in perek

17 with Kel Shakai telling Avraham 'hithalech
lefanai - ve-

heyeh tamim' is being given now to Yaakov -
the ish tam.

Try to explain the significance of this.

 

     Carefully compare Yitzchak's bracha to
Yaakov before he

departs to Padan Aram (28:3-4) to God's
blessing of Yaakov at

Bet El (35:9-13)!  Note that they are almost
identical.

     Relate this to the last two shiurim.

      Note that God's name 'be-shem Havaya'
does not appear

unto Yaakov from the time that he arrives in
Eretz Canaan!

Note also God's promise to Yaakov at Bet El,
before he left to

Padan Aram, (28:13-15) which was given
be-shem Havaya.  Are

any aspects of that bracha repeated in Bet El
when Yaakov

returned?  If so, which?

      Note the single use by Yaakov of shem
Havaya in his

prayer prior to his confrontation with Eisav
(32:9-12).  What

promise does he remind God of at that time?
Where is the

source of that promise.

     Relate to the relationship (be-shem
Havaya) between brit

bein ha-btarim, the bracha at the akeida, and
this tefilla.

Note - 'kochvei ha-shamayim' and 'asher lo
yisafer me-rov'.

     How does this relate to the
nationalistic aspect of these

revelations, i.e. the concept of 'yerushat
ha-aretz'.

     Could one consider from a nationalistic
perspective that

even though Yaakov returned from Galut Aram,
his stay in Eretz

Canaan was only a short stopover on his way
down to Galut

Mitzrayim?

Relate this to 'arami oved avi, va-yered
mitzrayim...'

(Devarim 36:3-10).  Compare the language
there to brit bein ha-

btarim!

Why do Chazal interpret this pasuk as
referring to Yaakov?

Could the fact that Yaakov understood that
the time for the

fulfillment of brit bein ha-btarim had not
yet come, explain

his timid behavior when he confronts Eisav?

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.atlchai.org/pipermail/par-reg/attachments/20131114/f0004388/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: vayish2.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 40425 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.atlchai.org/pipermail/par-reg/attachments/20131114/f0004388/attachment-0001.pdf>


More information about the Par-reg mailing list