[Par-reg] Shmot - questions for self study

Menachem Leibtag tsc at bezeqint.net
Mon Jan 5 15:31:30 EST 2015


*********************************************
****************

     THE TANACH STUDY CENTER
[http://www.tanach.org]

          In Memory of Rabbi Abraham Leibtag

     Shiurim in Chumash & Navi by Menachem
Leibtag

*********************************************
****************

 

     for SEFER SHMOT & PARSHAT SHMOT

 

         PART ONE - INTRO TO SEFER SHMOT

 

FIVE 'BOOKS'

1.  Recall that the Torah is called Chumash
because it

includes five individual books (i.e.
'chamesh' is the number

five); as each individual book is referred to
as a 'sefer'

[=book].

How does the fact that each sefer is an
individual book affect

the manner by which it should be studied and
understood?

  Surely,  each  of  the  five books relate
to  one  another,

however, explain why considering the Torah as
a collection  of

five individual books is different than
viewing it as one book

with five sections?

  

2.  In your opinion, would the fact that
Chazal consider each

book of Chumash an individual sefer imply
that each sefer

contains a unique theme?  If so, [based on
your previous

knowledge of Chumash], what would say is the
unique theme of

each sefer.  [For the purpose of our shiur,
answer this

question at least in regard to Sefer Shmot.]

 

3.  In our shiurim, we will attempt to
identify an overall

theme by following a very simple methodology.
First, we

construct a very general table of contents,
listing all the

major topics of the book.  Then, we analyze
that 'table of

contents', while attempting to turn it into
an 'outline' by

thematically grouping together its various
sections, and

contemplating the progression from topic to
topic.

  

  Attempt to do this for Sefer Shmot.  First,
give it a try

based on your previous knowledge of Sefer
Shmot (i.e. from

what you remember, without reading it again).
In other words,

try to divide the Sefer into approx. ten to
twenty distinct

sections, listing a general title for each.
Then, turn your

list into an outline, by identifying any sort
of thematic

progression from one section to the next.

     Based on your outline, can you identify
one overall theme

for the entire book?  If not, can you
identify several 'sub-

titles'?

 

4.  With this in mind, take a few minutes to
study the first

Ramban on Sefer Shmot, noting how he attempts
to identify an

overall theme not only for Sefer Shmot, but
for Sefer Breishit

as well.  Do you agree with his conclusions?
[Explain why yes

or not?]

     Based on this Ramban, is it clear that
he assumes that

one should attempt to identify a theme for
each sefer of

Chumash?

To verify your answer, see the first Ramban
in Sefer Vayikra,

Bamidbar and Devarim!

 

FROM BREISHIT TO SHMOT

5.  Return to the first line of this Ramban,
where he

identifies the overall theme of Sefer
Breishit.  Note how he

explains the connection between the story of
Creation and the

story of the Avot!  Explain how the need to
find one overall

theme for each sefer may have affected
Ramban's conclusion

that all of Sefer Breishit, including God's
choice of Avraham

Avinu and his family, could be understood as
a type of

'yetzira' (creation).

     Relate this to why Ramban (in his
commentary) will often

favor the principle of 'ma'aseh avot siman
le-banim'.

  [Be sure to note how Ramban understands
ma'aseh avot siman

  le-banim - that certain incidents in the
life of the Avot

  reflect the nature of future events that
will take place

  later on in Jewish history.]

 

     How does Ramban's conclusion relate to
our identification

(in our shiurim on Sefer Breishit) of
'bechira' [God's choice

of Avraham Avinu to become His special nation
etc.] as the

main theme for Breishit?

 

6.  Continue your study of this Ramban, and
make sure that you

understand his conclusion (re: the overall
theme of Sefer

Shmot).

     How does he explain the progression of
topics in Sefer

Shmot?  Relate to your outline of Sefer Shmot
(from above).

Do you agree with his conclusions?  Explain
why yes or why

not?

  According to Ramban's conclusions, is there
a thematic

connection between the themes of Sefer
Breishit and Sefer

Shmot?

     Would you expect there to be one?

 

7.  Where (and when) was the last instance
that God spoke to

Yaakov Avinu in Sefer Breishit?  [If you give
up, try Breishit

46:1-4.]

     What was Yaakov worried about, and what
is God's message

to him in this 'hitgalut'?  Does this come as
a surprise?

     [Does this explain why Bnei Yisrael
didn't return to

Eretz Canaan once the famine was over?]

     Where is the first time when God speaks
to man in Sefer

Shmot?         [If you give up, try chapter
three.]

     What is God's message to Moshe in that
hitgalut?!

     Find both the textual and thematic
parallel between this

last hitgalut of Breishit, and the first
hitgalut in Shmot.

     Based on this parallel, explain what you
would expect to

be the connection between Shmot and Breishit.
In your answer,

relate to the phrase "al tira..." in 46:3, as
well as in

Breishit 15:1, and in 26:23-24.  [Note the
connection between

all of these sources and Am Yisrael's
relationship with other

nations.]

 

8.  Based on the above question, would you
say that Sefer

Shmot is a continuation of the story of Sefer
Breishit, or

does it describe the fulfillment of God's
covenant made with

the Avot in Sefer Breishit?  In your answer,
relate to

Breishit 15:13-18 & 17:1-10.

     Based on your study of Sefer Breishit,
what do you expect

should happen in Sefer Shmot?  [Relate to
God's various

promises to the Avot, especially Breishit
12:1-8, 13:15-18,

15:1-20, 17:1-11, 35:9-13, 46:1-5, 48:21, &
50:24-25.]

 

9.  In your opinion, was Sefer Breishit
written during the

time of the Avot, or was it first given by
God to Am Yisrael

at Har Sinai?

  [In other words, did the people of Israel
in Egypt have the

  book of Breishit, was did they only receive
at Matan Torah?]

     How would they answer this question
affect how understand

the primary themes of both Sefer Breishit and
Sefer Shmot?

 

10.  Assuming that Sefer Breishit was first
given at Har

Sinai, in your opinion, were the people of
Israel in Egypt

aware of their ultimate destiny.  Were there
any mitzvot that

they needed to keep?  If so, what were they.

     Were there any 'family traditions'
regarding their future

destiny that should have been passed down
from one generation

to the next?  If so, what were they, and
would that affect how

we understand what transpires in Parshat
Shmot?

     In your answer, be sure to relate to
Breishit 12:1-3,

15:13-20, 17:1-11, 46:1-5, 48:21, & 50:24-25.

     How would this help you understand Moshe
Rabbeinu's

questions in chapter 3 regarding his
anticipation of what Bnei

Yisrael will ask when he will inform them
that the God of

their forefathers had appeared to him, and
promised their

redemption?

Relate to Shmot 3:6-7; 3:13-15; and 4:1-6.

 

TO SINAI or TO ISRAEL

1.  To the best of your recollection, what
was God's purpose

in the events of the Exodus -

  to bring the people to the Land of
Israel,or

  to bring them to Mount Sinai (to receive
the Torah),

  or both?

  

     Explain the underlying logic behind each
possibility, and

attempt to find psukim that would support
each opinion.

     Relate your answer to what God tells
Moshe at the burning

bush, noting especially 3:6-8; 3:10-12;
3:17-18 and 5:1-4.

     Relate as well to Shmot 29:46 and
Bamidbar 15:41!

 

                       for PARSHAT SHMOT

 

PART I - QUESTIONS FOR THE 'SHABBOS TABLE'

 

INCREMENTAL IMMORALITY

1.  In the opening psukim of Parshat Shmot
(see 1:7-10), the

Torah explains how the Egyptians were quite
worried about the

'Jewish population explosion', and hence
decided to kill all

newborn males.  In your opinion, if the
Egyptians were so

worried, why didn't they just kill adult
males as well to

limit the population?  Why was the edict only
against newborn

babies?

     In your opinion, could one consider
killing a newborn

baby less 'problematic' (morally) than
killing a child or an

adult?

  For an interesting perspective on this
question, see Ramban

on 1:10.  Note how he explains the
incremental manner by which

the enslavement began (because of 'moral'
considerations).

  [Note as well how later persecutions of the
Jewish people

  have begun in a similar manner.]

  

MOSHE RABBEINU'S FIRST EIGHTY YEARS

2.  Chapter two describes the birth of Moshe,
as well as his

early adulthood.  In your opinion, what is
the purpose (and/or

thematic significance) of these various
stories?

  In your opinion, was Moshe Rabbeinu chosen
by God from the

time of his birth to become the leader of Am
Yisrael, and to

take them out of Egypt, or, was he chosen by
God at the time

when redemption was necessary, based on his
character (and

life history), i.e. based on his 'credentials
for the job'.

  Explain how each approach would affect how
we understand the

stories in chapter two (concerning Moshe's
birth and the key

events in his life).   [See also Ibn Ezra on
4:20!]

  

3.  In your opinion, do the stories in
chapter two (describing

how Moshe killed an Egyptian and his
interference with a

quarrel between two Jews) reflect a strong
moral character?

Explain why yes, or why not.  [Relate your
answer to the

question above.]

  Do they relate in any manner to what will
transpire later on

his life?  If so, bring examples.

 

4.  Even though the Torah doesn't tell us how
old Moshe was

when he ran away from Egypt, in your opinion
(based on the

story), how old do you think he was?  [In
other words, how

many years elapse from the time that Moshe
runs away from

Egypt until he returns from Midyan?  Relate
to 2:11-23, 4:19,

and 7:7.

     How would the answer to this question
relate to why Moshe

Rabbeinu may have been reluctant to become
the leader of Am

Yisrael?  [See Rashbam on Shmot 4:10.]

 

5.  In your opinion, did Aharon serve in any
official position

before his brother Moshe was chosen by God to
become the new

leader of Bnei Yisrael? [Relate to 4:10-15,
see Rashi on

4:10.]

     Who (or what group) led Bnei Yisrael
before Moshe was

appointed as their leader?  Was it one
person, or a set of

elders from each tribe?  [Attempt to quote
psukim that support

your answer (especially from the end of
chapter 4 and in

chapter 5).]

     See also Rashi on 4:10

     In your opinion, did Moshe receive any
official

appointment from any previous governing body
before he became

Am Yisrael's accepted leader?  As before,
support your answer

with psukim from chapter four.  In your
answer, relate to 3:16-

18 & 4:27-31.  [Relate as well to Moshe's
question/request in

4:1-3.]

 

THE BURNING BUSH & HAR SINAI

6.  Aside from serving as an 'attention
getter', in your

opinion, is there any symbolism to the
'burning bush' (see 3:1-

5)?

     Relate to the key events that later take
place at this

very same location, i.e. Har Chorev = Har
Sinai.  See

especially Devarim 5:19-24 (and its context).
How does the

burning bush model what transpires at Matan
Torah?  [See also

Shmot 19:11,16-18 & 20:15!]

     Does Matan Torah take place at this same
spot?

    [In regard to Chorev and Sinai being the
same site, see

    Shmot 17:6 and its context, as well as
3:1-2].

 

WHO WAS THE LEADER BEFORE MOSHE?

7.  Before Moshe Rabbeinu becomes their
leader, do Bnei

Yisrael have an established leadership of any
sort?  If so,

who were their leaders and how were they
chosen?  Does this

leadership continue to function after Moshe
becomes their

leader?

     [Relate to the 'zkeinim' mentioned in
3:16, 12:21 (in

contrast to 12:3!); 19:7-8 etc:.]

     Do Bnei Yisrael have any official sort
of representation

before Pharaoh?  If so, who represented them,
and who chose

those representatives?  In your answer,
relate to the

'shotrim' & the 'meyaldot' as mentioned in
Shmot 1:18, 3:18, &

5:15.

     [See also Ibn Ezra Shmot 4:27. and Rashi
on 4:10!]

 

THE 'WIFE & KIDS'

8.  In your opinion, did Moshe Rabbeinu make
the proper

decision by taking his wife and children
along with him upon

his return to Midyan?  [See Shmot 14:18-26.]

     Should Moshe return to Egypt with his
wife and children,

would this indicate to the people that their
redemption is

near, or that it will probably still take a
long time before

they will leave?

     If he would return without them, would
that indicate that

their suffering will most probably continue
for quite a while?

     As a husband and father, would it be
better for Moshe to

have left this wife and children with his
in-laws?

     As 'redeemer of God's nation', would it
not have made

more sense for Moshe to hurry back to Egypt
immediately, and

not take away precious time by first dealing
with his own

family's needs?

     In your opinion, did Tzipora and the
children actually

come with Moshe to Egypt, or did they change
their plans and

return to Midyan?  If so, can you explain
why?

  In your answer, relate to 4:25-26 and
18:1-6.

     After contemplating these questions, see
how the

commentators dealt with these questions.
Note especially:

     Rashi on 18:2!

     Then, see Ibn Ezra on 4:20, for a rather
complex

explanation.

     Finally, see Seforno on 4:19 & 4:20 for
an amazing spin

on what took place.  According to this
Seforno, note how Moshe

must have been with Tzipora and children
while watching the

sheep near Chorev, and was returning to
Midyan to bring them

home, before he would embark on his own
journey to Egypt - by

himself!  What problems does this
interpretation solve?

=========

 

PART II - QUESTIONS FOR PREPARATION (for
weekly shiur)

     TOPIC: LET MY PEOPLE GO

 

1.  Most of us are very familiar with Moshe's
recurring

request to Pharaoh of 'Let My People Go'.  To
the best of your

recollection, when Moshe asks Pharaoh to 'let
my people go' -

what precisely is he asking for:

     a. To free Bnei Yisrael from slavery?

     b. To allow Bnei Yisrael to leave to
Eretz Canaan?

     c. Something else?

         [Is so, what is 'that something
else'?

     Does Pharaoh ever 'give in' to Moshe's
request?

If so, when does he give in and why does he
change his mind?

  [Note: These questions may appear to be
quite simple, but as

  you study Sefer Shmot, you'll most probably
realize that the

  'classic answers' that everyone gives for
these questions

  are 'all wrong'.]

 

2.  Review 1:8-10, which describes how and
why the enslavement

began.   Based on these psukim, what
precisely are the

Egyptians worried about, and how will Bnei
Yisrael's

enslavement (and later killing their male
children) help

'solve' this problem?

  Before the enslavement began, was there any
reason for Bnei

Yisrael to remain in Eretz Goshen instead of
returning to

Eretz Canaan?  [Relate to Breishit 46:1-4.]

     Before the enslavement began, was there
any logical

reason for the Egyptians to think that Bnei
Yisrael would

leave Egypt and return to Eretz Canaan?

     [Which land is better?  (Relate to
Devarim 11:10-11.)]

 

3.  Return once again to 1:10.  How did you
translate the

phrase -"ve-ala min ha-aretz"?

  Does this phrase imply that Egypt is
worried that Bnei

Yisrael would 'leave their country' once the
Egyptians are

defeated in war by their foreign enemies?  If
Bnei Yisrael

were so eager to leave Egypt, then why didn't
they just pick

up and leave before the enslavement began?
Furthermore, why

would Pharaoh be so worried about Bnei
Yisrael leaving Egypt

before they were enslaved?

     Is there any other possible
interpretation of this

phrase?

     Note how Rashi offers two opinions in
regard to the above

question.  Note also Ibn Ezra and Ramban.
How did they

understand this phrase?  Finally, see
Rashbam.  What is

difficult about Rashbam's explanation of this
pasuk?

     Keep this question in mind as you study
Shmot (thru

Parshat Beshalach), as this will be the key
towards

understanding Pharaoh's behavior.

 

4.  Scan the first five chapters of Sefer
Shmot, noting its

division into 'parshiot'.  Attempt to
identify the primary

topic of each 'parshia', and then construct a
summary outline,

listing the topic of each parshia.  Can you
explain the

progression of topic?

     In your opinion, which parshia could be
considered the

focal point of this unit, and which chapters
lead up to it?

     How does your answer relate to the theme
of Sefer Shmot

and its connection to the theme of Sefer
Breishit?

 

5.  Review the final three psukim of chapter
two (2:23-25).

[Note that they form a distinct parshia!]  In
your opinion,

what specific 'brit' does God remember at
this time (and why)?

     Based on these psukim, are Bnei Yisrael
praying for God

to take them out of Egypt to the Promised
Land, or do they

simply cry out, in hope that someone will
help alleviate their

workload?

     [For an interesting insight, see Ramban
on 3:13.]

 

6.  Review chapter 3 - i.e. the story of
Moshe at the 'sneh'

[the burning bush].

     In your opinion, what was the primary
purpose of this

'hitgalut' to Moshe Rabbeinu?  In other
words, what is the

main point that God is telling him, and does
everything else

either lead up to this, or follow from it?

  How does chapter 3 relate to Bnei Yisrael's
crying out (at

the end of chapter two), and in what manner
does it 'set the

stage' for what will take place later on in
Sefer Shmot?

 

7.  Construct an outline that summarizes the
primary topics in

chapter three, and the logic of its
progression.

     Based on your outline, is Moshe simply
receiving

'information' from God in regard to the
forthcoming

redemption, or is he given a specific
mission?

     If there is a mission, what is it, and
when and how is it

supposed to be fulfilled?  Is there more than
one mission?  If

so, what is the second?  [In your answer, be
sure to relate to

3:10-12.  See also question #2 in the
Parshanut section

below.]

 

8.  Based on God's commandment to Moshe in
3:10-22, what

message is Moshe supposed to deliver to Bnei
Yisrael

(concerning their forthcoming redemption) and
what message is

he supposed to deliver to Pharaoh?

     If these messages are different, can you
explain why?

 

     Be sure to pay special attention to
3:7-8 & 3:6-22.

Compare these psukim to God's earlier
promises to the Avot,

especially to brit bein ha-btarim (Br.
15:13-21) and brit mila

(17:7-8), as well as 46:1-3 and 50:24-25.

     Based on these parallels, could one
conclude that God is

telling Moshe that He has come now to fulfill
His brit?  If

so, which brit & why now?

     In your opinion, were Bnei Yisrael (in
Egypt) aware of

God's covenants that He had made with the
Avot?

     In your answer, relate to 3:13 and 4:1.

 

     As your read 3:13, explain why Moshe is
so sure that Bnei

Yisrael will immediately ask: "what Name of
God appeared to

him"?

     What should God's answer be to Moshe's
question?

     What is his answer?  [See Ramban on
3:13.]

[See also Rashbam in question #3 of Parshanut
section below!]

 

9.  Does Moshe ever tell Bnei Yisrael that he
intends to lead

them to Har Sinai?  If not, where does Moshe
tell Bnei Yisrael

that God is planning to take them?  [How long
should that

journey take?]

 

10.  Does Moshe ever demand from Pharaoh that
he allow Bnei

Yisrael freedom to migrate to Eretz Canaan?
If so, quote

those psukim?

     If not, can you find what he does demand
from Pharaoh in

each encounter?

     To verify your answer, scan from chapter
3 thru chapter

14, paying careful attention to each
conversation between

Moshe and Pharaoh regarding Moshe's demand -
"shlach et ami ve-

ya'avduni...", as well as the 'negotiations'
that take place

between Moshe and Pharaoh during the plagues:

     Be sure to review: 3:18, 5:1-4, 7:16 &
26, 8:16-24, 9:13,

10:3-11,24-29.  Explain how 5:1-4 'sets the
stage' for all of

Moshe's demands that follow!

     Then, review the story of the Exodus
itself (i.e. 12:29-

38, paying attention to why, when, and how
Pharaoh finally

allows Bnei Yisrael to leave Egypt.  Be sure
that you fully

understand 12:31-32, and how these psukim
relate to the list

of psukim quoted above!  [See Ibn Ezra on
5:1-3!]

     [In other words, when Pharaoh finally
allows Bnei Yisrael

to leave, is it in response to Moshe's
original request (in

5:3) or is it a total expulsion from Egypt
(i.e. forever)?]

 

     Finally, review 13:17-20 and 14:1-8,
making sure that you

understand exactly why Pharaoh 'changes his
mind', and decides

to chase after Bnei Yisrael.  Is it because
Bnei Yisrael had

left Egypt into the desert, or is it because
they don't leave

Egypt!  [Be sure that you understand what
transpires in 14:5

in relation to God's 'master plan' - as
described in 14:2-3.]

          [See also Ramban on 14:4-5.]

 

11.  With this background (i.e. your study of
the sources in

the above question), review 3:10-12 once
again, attempting to

understand how each pasuk relates to the
next.

    [To help your understanding of what
transpires in these

    three psukim, prepare a table that
compares the first

    half of each these three psukim to the
other, and the

    second half of each of these three psukim
to each other.

    Be sure that you recognize how there is a
statement,

    followed by a question, followed by an
answer.]

     What is the obvious problem in this flow
of topic in

these psukim? [Relate to the question and
answer.]

  Considering the mission that God gives to
Moshe in 3:10,

what type of questions would you expect Moshe
to ask?  [How;

Why, Why me?, etc.]

  What question(s) does he ask?  [Note how
God's answer in

3:12 should be able to help you explain the
ambiguity in

Moshe's question in 3:11. ]

  

12.  Now, see Rashi on these three psukim.
Does Rashi relate

to any of the problems that you noticed?  How
does he answer

them?

          In your opinion, is this 'pshat' or
'drash'.

  Next, see Ramban.  How does he solve the
problem in these

psukim?  How (and why) does he relate the
answer to all of

Moshe's questions to Ma'amad Har Sinai?

  Then, see Rashbam on 3:10-12.  Note how his
peirush relates

to your table (that compares these three
psukim).  Note how

confident Rashbam is that his interpretation
is the only

correct one!  [See both his opening and
closing comments.]

     In your opinion (based on the above
questions), why is

Rashbam so adamant that his interpretation to
Shmot 3:11-12 is

the only way to explain pshat?

     Do you agree with Rashbam that his
peirush is the only

'real' pshat?

 

13.  Note how Rashbam deals with the 'moral'
aspect' of his

conclusions, i.e. the fact that Moshe seems
to by 'lying' to

Pharaoh concerning his true intention.   Can
you explain why

he brings an example from Shmuel (see Shmuel
Aleph 16:1-3).

[Relate to the fact that both stories include
a 'zevach' as a

'decoy'.]

     Note also how Rashbam refers to this
'white-lie' as

'derech chochma'.  Relate his choice of words
to Shmot 1:8-10!

 

14.  Even if Rashbam is correct (that Moshe
did not tell

Pharaoh his real intention) - what is the
obvious problem with

the conclusion of his commentary?  [In other
words, what will

stop Pharaoh from finding out the truth?]

     In your answer, relate to what Moshe
tells Bnei Yisrael

in 4:29-31, based on 3:16-17.  Would it not
make sense that

Pharaoh would sooner or later find out the
'truth'?  Could

everyone 'keep this secret'?

 

15.  From the perspective of Pharaoh and the
Egyptian people,

how realistic would it be for the entire
Jewish to pick up and

emigrate en-masse to Canaan?  Without the
assistance of

miracles, would it be possible to make that
journey with women

and children?  Would it be feasible to defeat
the nations in

Canaan - to inherit their land (see Bamidbar
chapter 13!)?

     Based on these considerations, can you
suggest a reason

why Moshe does not request permission from
Pharaoh to

emigrate?

     Similarly, why is Pharaoh so reluctant
to allow the Jews

to travel into the desert?  [In your answer,
relate to 1:10!]

======

 

PART III - PARSHANUT

 

PSHAT vs. DRASH

1.  Note that the first parshia of Sefer
Shmot (1:1-6) re-caps

the 'toladot' of Yaakov, even though they
have already been

detailed in Sefer Breishit (see 46:8-27).
Can you explain

why?

     Now, see the first Rashi on Parshat
Shmot.

     Is this the same question which is
bothering Rashi?

          If so, what is Rashi's answer?

     Read Ramban on this same pasuk.  What is
his answer to

this question?  Why does he disagree with
Rashi?

     Now, re-read this Ramban, noting how he
brings down both

the opinions of Ibn Ezra and Rashi.

     Note, that even though he disagrees with
Rashi's

explanation of 'pshat', he states that the
Midrash that Rashi

quotes to explain this pasuk is true
('emet').  How does this

Ramban help us understand the difference
between drash &

pshat?

 

'HOUSES' FOR THE MIDWIVES

1. As you review Shmot 1:15-22, try to follow
the flow of

topic from one pasuk to the next.

  Based on your study, would it make more
sense that the

'midwives' (named Shifra & Pu'ah) were
Egyptians in charge of

giving birth to the Israelites, or were they
Jewish?

  In your opinion, are these two names Hebrew
or Egyptian?

  See Rashi, Ibn Ezra, Rashbam, and Seforno
on 1:15, noting

how their commentaries relate to these
questions.  Note as

well how many of them try to 'solve' the
problem of their

names being Hebrew.

  

2.  Recall how the midwives Shifra & Puah
feared God, and

hence didn't obey Pharaoh's decree.  Read
1:21 again (in the

context of 1:20-22), and determine if it
makes more to explain

that God made them "batim", or that Pharaoh
made them "batim".

Based on each possibility, what would the
word "batim" mean,

and how would it make sense in the context of
these psukim?

     After you see Rashi & Ramban on 1:21, be
sure to see

Rashbam and Chizkuni (especially the second
opinion he offers)

on 1:20-22!

     Are you surprised?

 

A 'CODED' INTERPRETATION

1.  See the Rashbam on 3:13-15, especially
his commentary on

'zeh zichri' (3:15), noting how he 'codes'
his answer in 'at-

bash' [a backwards Hebrew alphabet].  Decode
it, and decide

what his answer is, and how it relates to
question #5 in Part

Two above!

  How does his 'coded' answer relate to his
commentary in 3:13-

15 which explains why we don't always use
God's Name when

referring to Him?  Do you understand why he
'coded' this

answer?

 

2.  Next, see Ramban on 3:13.  Can you
explain how and why his

peirush relates to Shmot 6:2-6?  How is his
peirush different,

& how is it similar to Rashbam's?

     Finally, see (but don't study) Ibn Ezra
on 3:13.  It's

quite difficult, and I doubt that you'll
understand it (as I

didn't), but from reading it you can see at
least how

important this pasuk is to him.

 

FROM MIDYAN - BACK TO EGYPT

1.  See 4:18-23.  How do these psukim relate
to what God had

told Moshe earlier at the sneh in 3:6-4:17?
[Relate to 2:23-

25.]

     In your opinion, when did God tell Moshe
what is recorded

in 4:19? [Before he returned to Yitro (see
4:18), or

afterward?]

     First, see Ibn Ezra on 4:19, noting how
he answers this

question.  What problem leads him to this
conclusion?

  Would you consider this a 'classic example'
of 'ein mukdam u-

me'uchar', or a 'special type'?

     Then, see Ramban.  Note how and why he
argues with Ibn

Ezra's conclusion.  Note as well Rashbam,
Chizkuni, and

Seforno.  Do they support Ibn Ezra's approach
or Ramban's?

 

2.  During Moshe's journey from Midyan to
Egypt, a very

'strange' story takes place along the way,
where God meets

Moshe and wishes to kill him (or his child).
Review 4:18-26

and be sure you understand the difficulties
in their

interpretation.

     As you review these psukim, note how
often the concept of

'bechor' [first born] appears, and in what
contexts.  Note as

well how this story ties together the mitzva
of brit mila and

the warning of 'makkat bechorot'.  When do
these two concepts

appear together once again?  [Relate to Shmot
12:43-50 and

Yehoshua 5:1-5!]

 

3.  Next, review 4:24-26 once again, this
time in search of at

least a 'hint' concerning what Moshe did
wrong that God would

want to kill him?  Furthermore, try to
determine who the

'mal'ach' wants to kill - Moshe or his son?

     Then, see Rashi on 4:24, noting how he
answers these

questions.

     Then, see Ibn Ezra, noting how his
commentary is both

similar, but different than Rashi's?  How do
both of them

explain why Moshe did the 'wrong thing', even
though he was

trying his best to do what was right!

     Next, see Rashbam.  How (and why) is his
explanation

totally different than Rashi's?  How is it
different from Ibn

Ezra's?

  In your opinion, on which pasuk (or
context) does Rashbam

base his interpretation?

     To better understand these different
approaches, see also

Chizkuni on this pasuk (and Seforno).

     [Note also that there is no Ramban on
these psukim!]

     Finally, see Rabbeinu Chananel.  Note
how (and why) he

explains that Moshe was not event present
during this entire

event!  How does this interpretation solve
most all of the

problems raised above?  What is problematic
with this peirush?

 

                         be-hatzlacha,

                         menachem

 

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.atlchai.org/pipermail/par-reg/attachments/20150105/42219e33/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: shmotq.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 53236 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.atlchai.org/pipermail/par-reg/attachments/20150105/42219e33/attachment-0001.doc>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: shmotq.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 59861 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.atlchai.org/pipermail/par-reg/attachments/20150105/42219e33/attachment-0001.pdf>


More information about the Par-reg mailing list