[Par-reg] Bshalach - questions for self study
Menachem Leibtag
tsc at bezeqint.net
Wed Jan 28 08:53:46 EST 2015
*********************************************
****************
THE TANACH STUDY CENTER
[http://www.tanach.org]
In Memory of Rabbi Abraham Leibtag
Shiurim in Chumash & Navi by Menachem
Leibtag
*********************************************
****************
PARSHAT BESHALACH -
PART I - QUESTIONS FOR THE 'SHABBOS TABLE'
RAINING 'BREAD'
1. Review 16:4, noting the verb that the
Torah uses to
describe how the bread fell from heaven.
Attempt to relate
this to a similar usage of this verb in
Breishit 2:5!
Recall as well from Shmot 17:6, where
the water came from
while they were in the desert.
Then, review Devarim 11:10-17, noting
how the Torah
describes the manner by which the Land of
Israel will receive
its 'rain', and from where its produce will
grow.
Based on these sources, note the
contrast between the
sources of rain and bread in the desert in
relation to their
sources in the Land of Israel. Attempt to
explain how this
may be significant.
2. Next, review Devarim 8:1-18, and relate
that section to
your answer to the above question. Finally,
recall the
blessing that we make before eating bread
[i.e. "ha'motzei
lechem min ha'aretz"]. Technically speaking,
is the statement
that we make in that blessing true?
Thematically speaking,
why is that blessing so meaningful? [See
Ramban on 16:4
starting "l'maan anasenu"!]
THE FIRST 'SHABBOS'
1. In your opinion, did Bnei Yisrael in Egypt
keep (or know
about) Shabbat (and any of its laws)? If
so, how did they
find out?
Now, carefully review what God first
tells Moshe
concerning the 'manna' in 16:4-5. Based on
16:5, does it seem
that Bnei Yisrael (or at least Moshe) already
knows about the
concept of 'shabbat'?
Next, carefully review from 16:6-21, noting
whether or not
Moshe & Aharon ever told Bnei Yisrael
concerning what they
were supposed to do on 'the sixth day' (as
God commanded them
in 16:5). [Can you explain why they didn't?]
[Did you understand 16:5 as a 'command' for
Moshe to relay
to Bnei Yisrael, or simply as information
that God wanted
Moshe to know? ]
Now, carefully review 16:22-27, i.e. the
story of
happened on the sixth day. In you opinion,
did the people
take double because they were commanded to;
or did they take
the normal amount, but it turned out to be
double - and hence
they were all very surprised! [Relate your
answer to the
question above!]
If indeed they were taken by surprise by
the double
amount on the sixth day, and the fact that it
didn't spoil -
what would be the 'pedagogic advantage' of
this sequence of
events?
2. For some insight on the above questions,
first see Rashi
on 16:22 (noting how he claims that Moshe
should have told
them, but he didn't!). Then, see Rashbam on
16:23, where he
explains that Moshe didn't tell them on
purpose, for
'pedagogic' reasons - i.e. to make their
'first shabbos' a big
surprise!
See also Rashi & Seforno on 16:5.
3. With the story in 16:4-27 in mind, read
again the Fourth
Commandment ("zchor et Yom ha'shabbat..." /
Shmot 20:8-11).
In your opinion, how did these events
affect (and enhance)
how Bnei Yisrael understood (and appreciated)
God's special
commandment to keep Shabbat?
[Relate these events as well to Rashi on
15:25.]
4. Finally, review 16:33-36. In your
opinion, when did these
events take place? If at a later time, why
are they recorded
at this time? See Rashi & Rashbam on 16:33 (&
Ibn Ezra on
16:32)
.
TO CANAAN or TO THE DESERT?
1. As you read the opening pasuk of Parshat
Beshalach
(13:17), attempt to explain the phrase 'ki
karov hu'.
Did you translate 'ki' as 'because', or
as 'even though'?
How would this affect how you understand this
pasuk?
For a discussion on this topic, see
first Ibn Ezra
(aroch) and Chizkuni. Note the other
examples that they
bring. Then see Ramban.
2. In your opinion, when Bnei Yisrael left
Egypt, did the
people know for sure where they were going
to?
Did they realize that they were supposed
to 'stop on the
way' at Har Chorev? If so, for what purpose:
to thank God; or
to receive the Torah; or both?
If possible, support your answer with
psukim.
How would your answer to this question
affect the way you
understand Bnei Yisrael's behavior in the
desert?
3. When Bnei Yisrael first left Egypt, for
how long (in your
opinion) did they expect to be traveling for
in the desert
(until reaching the Promised Land)? [How
long of a journey is
it from Egypt to Canaan? (Relate to Devarim
1:2.)]
See Shmot 16:1-3. Based on these psukim,
what conclusion
can we reach re: the food supply that Bnei
Yisrael took with
them for their journey? Can you explain why?
ETHICS & THE EXODUS
4. Review 14:1-4, noting how God instructs
Bnei Yisrael to do
a maneuver. Does this appear to be a trick?
In your opinion,
does there appear to be a 'moral' problem
with this?
See Ibn Ezra (aroch) on 14:1 and Ibn
Ezra (katzar) or
14:8 for an interesting perspective!
See also Ramban on Shmot10:10!
THE 'LAST STANZA'
5. As you review 'shirat ha-yam' (15:1-19),
note how just
about all of the psukim describe the events
of how the sea
split and how Egyptians were killed and Bnei
Yisrael were
saved. However, towards the end of the
'shira' [song] we find
a slightly different topic.
With this is mind, attempt to explain
15:17. How does
this pasuk relate to the rest of the shira?
In a similar manner, attempt to explain
15:18!
Finally, see 15:19. In your opinion, is
this pasuk part
of the shira? If not, what is it doing here?
For an
interesting discussion re: this question, see
Ramban on 15:19.
[See also Chizkuni on 15:19 for a very novel
approach.]
======
PART II - QUESTIONS FOR PREPARATION (for the
weekly shiur)
1. In your opinion, what was the purpose of
God's miracles at
'kriyat Yam Suf':
a) for Bnei Yisrael to recognize God;
b) for the Egyptians to recognize God;
c) for both (a) & (b) ;
d) for a different (or additional)
reason?
[Support your answer with psukim.]
According to your answer, can you
explain why the 'Ten
Plagues' were not sufficient to accomplish
this same purpose?
2. After crossing the Red Sea, Bnei Yisrael
finally began
their travel into the desert. Based on their
original request
(from Pharaoh) for a three day journey to
worship their God,
where 'should' Bnei Yisrael now travel to,
and what should
they do when they arrive there?
[Relate to 3:12; 3:18; & 5:1-3.]
Where do Bnei Yisrael arrive at after
their first three
days of travel? What happens there? How
(and why) is this
significant?
[Compare what happens at Mara to the First
Plague, relating
to Shmot 4:9, 5:3 & 15:26!]
When do Bnei Yisrael finally arrive at
Har Chorev, and
what happens there? [i.e. did they actually
bring korbanot?
See 24:5-8, noting which korbanot were
offered, and why.]
3. List the various situations of peril
arise in Parshat
Beshalach whereupon Bnei Yisrael complain to
God (noting how
and why they complain); after which God
provides a solution
(noting how the problem is solved).
In your opinion, does God expect Bnei
Yisrael not to
complain when these situations arise (e.g.
when there is a
lack of water or food)?
Similarly, in your opinion - did these
situations arise by
'chance', or do they appear to be
'orchestrated' by God?
If the latter, what was their purpose?
4. Review once again the list of events that
transpire in
Parshat Beshalach (as Bnei Yisrael travel
towards Har Sinai).
Can you identify a pattern or common purpose?
See if you can find the word 'nisayon'
(or similar) in
any or all of these events. If so, explain
its meaning, and
how it relates to the purpose of these
events. [Relate to
Breishit 22:1!]
5. The famous story of Moshe hitting the
rock begins when
Bnei Yisrael are encamped in Refidim (17:1).
To the best of your recollection (don't
look at the
psukim yet), was the rock that Moshe hit also
in Refidim? If
not, where was it? Does the entire nation
gather when he hits
the rock? If not, who is with him at that
time?
Now, read 17:5-7, and answer the above
questions (once
again). Can you explain why Moshe is
instructed to hit a rock
in Chorev instead of a rock in Refidim?
In your opinion, how did the water get
from the rock to
the camp in Refidim?
6. If you were in Refidim and thirsty, would
you have waited
for the water to come to you? What do you
think most of the
people did, as soon as they heard about the
water at Chorev?
[Relate to Shmot 19:1-2. See also Ibn Ezra
on 17:9 & Devarim
9:21!]
Based on your answer, what appears to be
the 'original'
reason for Bnei Yisrael's arrival at Har
Sinai? [Relate your
answer to the famous 'analogy' of 'ein mayim
ela Torah' [the
only true 'water' is Torah]?
AMALEK ATTACKS
7. Based on your answer to the above
question, attempt to
understand the setting for when Amalek
attacks, as described
in 17:8. Note the details of this attack as
described in 17:8-
16 as the parallel account in Devarim
25:17-19.
How would this help you understand the
meaning of the phrase
"ve-lo yare Elokim" in Devarim 25:18?
[Relate to its similar
usage in Breishit 20:11 & 42:18 and Shmot
1:21.]
How would this help you understand the
deeper meaning of
God's eternal war against 'Amalek' (and those
who continue in
their ways)?
PART III - PARSHANUT
===================
A MITZVA or A PROMISE
1. In 14:9-12, Bnei Yisrael - with their
'backs to the sea'
and Egypt attacking - cry out to God for
help. Moshe responds
to Bnei Yisrael as follows (14:13):
"Do not fear, stand strong and witness
God's deliverance
today - for in the way which you see
Mitzrayim today - lo
tosifu lir'otam ad olam - you will never
see them again...
As you read this pasuk (noting its
context), attempt to
determine whether it is a promise or a
commandment? If it is
a promise, is it a promise for only this
generation, or for
all generations (read the pasuk carefully)?
How did you explain the word 'derech' in
this pasuk?
Then, see Rashi on 14:13 - how does he
explain this
pasuk?
Next, see Ramban (on 14:13), quoting
Chazal. Note that
he claims that this pasuk is indeed to be
understood as a
commandment!
Can you explain, according to Chazal,
precisely what this
commandment entails? Does it apply only to
Egypt?
Would you consider this interpretation
as 'pshat'?
Explain why yes and why not.
Next, read Parshat Ha-melech in Sefer
Devarim (17:14-20),
noting especially 17:16:
"He (the king) must not gather too many
horses (i.e. for
chariots & calvary to strengthen his army),
and he must not
return the people to Mitzrayim in order to
add horses, for
God has already warned you - lo tosifu
lashuv ba-derech ha-
zeh od - you must not go back this way
again.
How does this statement relate textually
and thematically
to the psukim above at kriyat Yam Suf (Shmot
14:13)?
Attempt to explain how Chazal's
interpretation of 14:13
as a commandment may be based on this pasuk
in Devarim.
Next, read Devarim 28:68 (noting its
context, it's the
final pasuk of the tochacha in Ki Tavo). How
do you
understand the phrase "ba-derech asher amarti
- lo tosif od
lir'otah..." -
What is the meaning of 'ba-derech' in
this phrase?
[Will those who will be 'deported' to
Egypt want someone
to buy them? / read 26:68 carefully]
Does this pasuk support Chazal's peirush in
Shmot 14:13?
[See also Yeshayahu 31:1-3 & Yerushalmi
Sukka V.1. (23a)]
[See also Ibn Ezra on 14:13 for an
interesting perspective
on why Bnei Yisrael didn't 'fight back'.
WHAT BOOK ARE THEY TALKING ABOUT?
2. In 17:14, God instructs Moshe to write
down the story of
what Amalek did in a sefer. In your opinion,
what 'sefer' is
this, and what was the purpose in writing it
down?
Also, why must he 'put it' in Yehoshua's
ears? [See
Rashi!]
First, see Ibn Ezra (aroch & katzar) re:
which book this is.
[See also Chizkuni.]
Then see Ramban, noting how and why he
disagrees.
Finally, see Seforno for a very
interesting explanation!
THE LAWS AT MARA
3. Review 15:25 in the context of 15:23-26.
Based on the simplest reading of this
pasuk (and its
context), what laws does the phrase 'chok
u-misphat' refer to?
Similarly, what nisayon does the Torah
refer to?
In your opinion, does 15:25 summarize
what took place in
15:23-24, or is it something additional that
takes place?
Similarly, does 15:26 explain 15:25, or
does it describe
something additional that takes place?
Is there any logical reason for laws to
be taught at this
time? If so, what type of laws would you
expect to find?
Now see Rashi. How does he explain each
word in 15:25? Why
does he relate to laws that are found only
later on in
Chumash? [How does his peirush relate to
what transpires in
the next chapter?]
Next see Ramban. Why are his reasons
for not accepting
Rashi's interpretation? How does he explain
this phrase?
Would you consider Ramban's peirush closer
to pshat than
Rashi's?
Finally see Rashbam. How does he solve
the problem of
what specific laws these refer to?
How is his interpretation totally different
than Rashi and
Ramban's? [Can you explain what leads
Rashbam to his
conclusion?]
See also Ibn Ezra. Is his peirush the
same as Rashbam's?
be-hatzlacha,
menachem
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.atlchai.org/pipermail/par-reg/attachments/20150128/05bca435/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: bshalq.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 48128 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.atlchai.org/pipermail/par-reg/attachments/20150128/05bca435/attachment-0001.doc>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: bshalq.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 30531 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.atlchai.org/pipermail/par-reg/attachments/20150128/05bca435/attachment-0001.pdf>
More information about the Par-reg
mailing list