[Par-reg] Kedoshim/ Emor - questions for self study
Menachem Leibtag
tsc at bezeqint.net
Thu Apr 30 06:14:49 EDT 2015
*********************************************
****************
THE TANACH STUDY CENTER
[http://www.tanach.org]
In Memory of Rabbi Abraham Leibtag
Shiurim in Chumash & Navi by Menachem
Leibtag
*********************************************
****************
PARSHAT KEDOSHIM
PART I - QUESTIONS FOR THE 'SHABBOS TABLE'
'TALKING REVENGE' & 'HOLINESS'
1. Review 19:18, noting how it discusses a
very important
mitzva of "lo tikom" (which unfortunately is
often
overlooked). As you study the first half of
19:18 (not to
mention the second half), be sure to see
Rashi's commentary
(and Ramban's) re: the meaning of both
phrases: 'lo tikom' and
've-lo titor'.
According to Rashi's interpretation of
what these phrases
imply, isn't it rather amazing that this type
of behavior -
which most of us would consider 'normal' (or
even 'expected')
- is actually an 'issur de-oraita' [a Torah
prohibition]!
Can you explain why the Torah forbids this
type of behavior?
Also, how does it relate to being "kadosh"
(holiness), which
is the primary topic of this unit of mitzvot?
In your opinion, why do you think that
there are so many
people (and unfortunately sometimes even
rabbis) who arre not
familiar with this law? [And why is it that
many people who
do know these laws have trouble observing
them?]
2. Based on the above question, attempt to
explain how 19:18
thematically relates to 19:14-17.
Then, note the sudden change of topic in
19:19, and
especially its 'header' [that introduces the
laws in the next
set of psukim). Can you explain the thematic
nature of this
transition?
Finally, review the finale of this
chapter, i.e. 19:33-
36. Use these psukim [and their finale (i.e.
19:36)] to
explain how this can explain the transition
from 19:18-19.
SHABBAT & the MIKDASH
3. Review 19:30, noting the connection
between the mikdash
and Shabbat. Where else in Chumash do we
find a similar
thematic connection between Shabbat & the
mikdash / mishkan?
[If you give up, see Shmot 31:12-16
and 35:1-4.]
Can you explain why this pasuk is
located specifically at
this point in Parshat Kedoshim?
[Relate to "kedushat zman" vs. "kedushat
makom".]
If you have ample time, note as well the
various
commentaries on 19:30, noting how each one
takes a slightly
different angle.
WHY THE REPEAT?
4. Note how the commandment 'lo ta'aseh avel
ba-mishpat' is
stated twice in chapter 19 (see 19:15 &
19:35). Read each of
these psukim carefully, noting their context;
and attempt to
ascertain whether this is simply a repeat of
the same law, or
if each commandment relates to a different
type of situation.
Then, see Rashi on 19:35, noting the way
he explains how
each commandment in unique.
See the interpretation of Ibn Ezra as well.
THE TEN COMMANDMENTS IN PARSHAT KEDOSHIM
[for shiur #1 this week]
1. Many commentators have noted that one can
find an example
of each of the Ten Commandments (or a very
similar mitzva) in
the opening psukim of Parshat Vayikra.
Before seeing the commentaries inside,
carefully review
chapter 19 and attempt to find these
parallels on your own.
When you finish, record your answers so
that later on,
you can compare your conclusions to those of
the various
commentators.
2. Review your conclusions once again, this
time organizing
them as follows:
a) Commandments that have an obvious
parallel.
[for example - 'honoring parents' / see
19:3]
b) Commandments that have only a tangential
parallel
c) Commandments that appear to have no
parallel
Considering that there are so many
Commandments that have
parallels, can you explain why the
commentators are so eager
to find parallels for all of the ten
commandments?
Can you explain why only some of the
parallels are obvious,
why others or only 'alluded' to?
3. For the Commandments that you did find
parallels for, note
their order within Parshat Kedoshim. How
does that order
relate to their order in the original Ten
Commandments?
Note as well the phrases 'Ani Hashem'
and 'Ani Hashem
Elokeichem' that repeat themselves so often
in this section,
and note especially where we find each
phrase. Does this
appear to be random, or organized? If you
find some type of
'organization' - attempt to explain its
logic.
Relate these two phrases and where they
appear to the Ten
Commandments that the psukim that precede
each phrase
corresponds to.
4. Now, let's see how the commentators
related to these
parallels.
First see the Chizkuni on 19:2, and make a
list of all of
his conclusions. Did your list match his?
Can you explain
the differences (if there are any)?
Next, see Ramban on 19:4 (towards the end),
where he too
finds all of the Ten Commandments in this
parsha.
Finally, see also the Ibn Ezra on 19:2
('ki kadosh...')!
Using your list, make note in regard to
which
Commandments everyone agrees (on the
parallel), and on which
we find differences of opinion.
Based on your own attempt to identify these
parallels,
attempt to explain why.
5. Even though these mitzvot are similar to
the Ten
Commandments, they are not identical. There
are also many
examples of additional mitzvot. Try to
define the manner in
which the mitzvot in Kedoshim are different
than the dibrot
(i.e. are they more strict or lenient etc.),
even though they
may also be 'parallel'.
Is this difference significant? Can you
relate it to the
title of the Parsha - 'Kedoshim tihiyu'?
6. Review the first 18 psukim of chapter 19
once again, this
time noting how often the phrase ANI HASHEM
is repeated. Is
there a pattern to this repetition?
Note when it states ANI HASHEM and ANI
HASHEM ELOKEICHEM.
Does this also fit into a pattern?
Does this pattern relate in any way to
the division of
the DIBROT into 'two halves'?
How does this observation relate to the
parallels that
you found between the DIBROT and the mitzvot
in chapter 19?
[See questions #1 & #2 above.]
Which mitzva in Parshat Kedoshim seems
to 'ruin' this
pattern? Can you explain why?
7. Review 19:5-10. Based on the pattern set
by "ani Hashem
Elokeichem", can you explain why this set of
psukim could be
considered a 'sub-unit'? Are these psukim
connected in any
manner to the Ten Commandments, or did you
list them in any of
your parallels?
In you opinion, what is the connection
between 19:5-8 and
19:9-10? How do either of these mitzvot
relate to the other
mitzvot in chapter 19?
8. Review Shmot 20:19-23, noting how these
psukim are the
first mitzvot that Bnei Yisrael receive after
the Ten
Commandments. Can you find a parallel
between these mitzvot
and the DIBROT as well? Then, continue
reading into chapter
21 [Parshat Mishpatim] and see if this
pattern continues.
Relate these parallels to your answers to the
above questions.
[See also the TSC shiur on Parshat
Mishpatim.]
=========
PART TWO - QUESTIONS FOR PREPARATION
for SHIUR #2
- The Header: "KOL ADAT BNEI YISRAEL"
1. In what manner is the header of Parshat
Kedoshim (19:1-2)
different than the standard header
introducing a parsha of
mitzvot that is usually found in Chumash?
Does Rashi comment on this?
If so, what is his comment? How does it
explain the
reason for this difference?
2. Where else in Chumash do we find a parsha
of mitzvot that
also includes the header of "KOL ADAT BNEI
YISRAEL"?
Does it relate in any way to Parshat
Kedoshim?
[If you give up, try Shmot 12:1-3,
and 35:1]
Do any of these sources help you better
understand the
Rashi referred to above/ 19:2 -
"daber...melamed she-ne'emar
be-hakhel..."?
See also Vayikra 8:3-5!
3. What does the word 'eida' mean? What is
the Hebrew
'shoresh' of this word?
Can you relate this shoresh to the
reason why this parsha
was given to the entire eida?
4. In what context do Bnei Yisrael serve as
'eidim'
[witnesses?] when they fulfill the
commandments of KEDOSHIM
TIHIYU?
See Seforno on 19:2, and relate his
commentary to your
answer?
5. See also Chizkuni on 19:2, and compare
his peirush to that
of Rashi on 19:2 [in regard to 'daber el kol
adat Bnei
Yisrael']. In what way is Chizkuni similar,
and in what way
is his statement different from Rashi's?
Attempt to explain
why.
=======
for SHIUR #3
THE REPETITION OF THE 'ARAYOT'
1. Even though the 'arayot' [forbidden
marital relationships]
were already detailed in chapter 18, most all
of them are
repeated again in chapter 20. After
verifying this point,
attempt to determine in what manner their
presentation is
chapter 20 is different. At this point,
relate only to the
laws of the arayot themselves in 20:10-21 AND
to the laws that
'surround' them in 20:1-9 and 20:22-27.
Can you suggest a reason for this
repetition of the same
set of laws twice? In your answer, relate as
well to the
placement of chapter 19 in between them.
2. Next, carefully review the psukim that
surround these
arayot (in 20:10-21), i.e. to 20:1-9 and
20:22-27. Attempt to
understand (and explain) the internal
'structure' of chapter
20.
Then, compare this structure to the
internal structure in
chapter 18, where we also find psukim that
'surround' the
arayot, i.e. to 18:1-5 and 18:24-30 that
surround 18:6-23.
In what manner is this structure similar
to the pattern
in chapter 20? In what manner is it
different?
3. What specific laws does chapter 20
contain that were not
found in chapter 18? What 'general'
statements are found in
both chapters, and what is their importance?
4. In regard to the structure of chapter 20,
what is
especially difficult about its final pasuk
(i.e. 20:27)? In
your opinion, why is this pasuk 'out of
place' and where in
this chapter does it belong?
5. If you are familiar with 'chiastic
structures', see if you
can find one within chapter 20. Use this
(and your answer to
question #1) to explain the final pasuk of
chapter 20.
Be sure to compare the overall structure
of chapter 20 to
that of chapter 18. Attempt to explain the
nature of this
parallel.
How does the topic of chapter 19 [i.e.
kedoshim tihiyu]
relate to one of the levels of the chiastic
structure found in
chapter 20?
6. For those of you familiar with the sugya
in the Gemara of
"ein onshin ela im kein mazhirin" [there is
no punishment (by
Bet Din) unless first this is a warning],
relate this
principle to the above question!
=======
PART III - PARSHANUT
PARSHAT KEDOSHIM AS PART OF SEFER VAYIKRA
1. See Ramban on 19:2. How does Ramban
explain why Parshat
Kedoshim is recorded in Sefer Vayikra?
Review Ramban's introduction to Sefer
Vayikra (on 1:1).
Relate this to his peirush on 19:2.
2. Next, see Ibn Ezra on 19:2. How does he
answer this
question?
How and why are their answers different?
3. Finally see Seforno on 19:2. Study it
very carefully!
According to Seforno, why is Parshat
Kedoshim in Sefer
Vayikra? How does Seforno use this to
explain the progression
of parshiot in Sefer Vayikra?
In what manner is his approach TOTALLY
different than
Ramban's (in regard to this question)?
Note carefully how Seforno finds not
only a thematic
connection between Parshat Kedoshim and the
first half of
Sefer Vayikra, but also how he connects this
progression to
primary themes in both Sefer Shmot and Sefer
Breishit!
Explain how, and how this is consistent
with Seforno's
overall [thematic] approach to Parshanut.
[Relate this as well to his intro. to
Chumash!]
THE FLOW OF TOPICS IN CHAPTER 19
4. See the first Ibn Ezra on Vayikra chapter
19, noting how
he explains his entire approach to his
interpretation of sets
of mitzvot in the Torah (like chapter 19),
and why he tries to
find a reason for the progression of topic
from one mitzvah to
the next.
Then, if you have time, review the
entire commentary of
Ibn Ezra on chapter 19, noting how he
explains the flow of
topic from one pasuk to the next. If you
have even more time,
before you see each Ibn Ezra, attempt to
suggest a reason
first on your own.
be-hatzlacha,
menachem
*********************************************
****************
THE TANACH STUDY CENTER
[http://www.tanach.org]
In Memory of Rabbi Abraham Leibtag
Shiurim in Chumash & Navi by Menachem
Leibtag
*********************************************
****************
PARSHAT EMOR
PART I - QUESTIONS FOR THE 'SHABBOS TABLE'
"CHILLUL" & "KEDUSHA" [chapters 21 & 22]
1. As you review the laws in chapters 21 &
22, note how often
we find the word (and/or concepts of)
"chillul" and "kedusha".
[Note as well how we find these words in just
about each
'parshia' division within these two
chapters.]
What is the meaning of each of these two
words, and how
are these concepts related?
Use this to explain the thematic connection
between the
topics found in these two chapters.
2. How do these two words - "chillul" and
"kedusha" - relate
to the overall theme of Sefer Vayikra (as
discussed in our
shiur on Acharei Mot). Relate especially to
18:1-5, i.e. the
'introductory psukim' of the second half of
Sefer Vayikra.
Relate your answer as well to 22:31-33,
noting how they
summarize of this unit (and these concepts),
and form a
beautiful conclusion.
[Relate alsol to Tehillim 34:13-15!]
3. In chapter 21, we find how the "kohanim"
our bound by a
special set of an additional laws [and
restrictions] - because
their responsibility is to serve God. Can
you find a similar
concept in relation to the special laws in
Parshat Kedoshim
(Vayikra chapters 19 & 20) that Bnei Yisrael
are obligated to
keep?
In your opinion, are the laws in Parshat
Kedoshim special
for the people of Israel, or would God expect
all mankind to
keep those laws. Explain your answer.
In your answer, relate to 20:26, noting
how we find yet
another beautiful summary pasuk!
4. As you study the laws in chapters 21 &
22, attempt to
explain the logic of the progression from one
topic to the
next. While doing so, relate to the following
questions:
How is the law of a KOHEN "tamey"
similar to the law of
KOHEN "ba'al mum" [someone with a physical
blemish or defect]?
How is it different?
Attempt to explain why a kohen "baal mum"
is permitted to
eat "kodshim", while a "kohen tamey" cannot.
Why can't either of them offer korbanot?
In what manner are the laws relating to
a kohen "ba'al
mum" similar to the laws of an animal that is
a "ba'al mum"?
How is the prohibition against offering an
animal less than
eight days old similar to the prohibition of
a "ba'al mum"?
5. Even though a KOHEN "baal mum" cannot
offer korbanot (see
21:16-21), he is permitted to eat them (see
21:22-23).
Attempt to explain the underlying logic of
these two laws.
Would you consider either (or both) of
them 'fair'? In
other words, is it 'fair' that a kohen cannot
offer a
sacrifice just because he has some type of
deformity?
6. Recall how chapters 6 & 7 in Parshat Tzav
constituted a
special set of laws for the "kohanim"
concerning HOW they are
supposed to offer the various korbanot.
In what manner are the laws in Parshat
Tzav different
from the laws relating to "kohanim" in
Parshat Emor (in
chapters 21-22)? [Note the header in 6:1-2,
compare with
21:1.]
Relate your answer to our shiur on
Parshat Acharei Mot in
regard to the two 'halves' of Sefer Vayikra.
[In other words,
how does Parshat Tzav relate to "kedushat
Mishkan", while
Parshat Emor relates to "kedushat ha'am".]
PARALLEL PSUKIM
1. What is difficult about the last pasuk in
chapter 21? In
other words, what specifically did Moshe tell
Aharon, the
Kohanim and Bnei Yisrael? [Or what does it
'summarize'?]
In your answer, relate 21:16-17, 21:1, &
20:1-2! What is
special about these three 'headers', and how
do they explain
the last pasuk in chapter 21?
Do you think that this summary pasuk
could also be
considered a conclusion to chapters 18->19 as
well?
Support your answer!
2. Carefully study the 'style' of the opening
psukim to
chapter 23 (i.e. 23:1-4), noting how they
contain a 'double
introduction'. Then, compare this 'style' to
the opening
psukim to Parshat Va'yakhel (i.e. Shmot
35:1-4).
Note how each contains a similar
commandment in regard to
Shabbat, which doesn't appear to be directly
related to the
header!
In your opinion, how can this parallel
'style' help
understand the connection between the laws of
shabbat in
relation to both the building the Mishkan and
the "moadim"?
See Ramban on 23:2 for a detailed
discussion of this
topic and this parallel.
3. As your review chapter 23 (i.e. the
"moadim"), note how the
phrase "chukat olam l'doroteichem..." can be
found in the laws
of almost every holiday. First, verify this
statement by
locating the precise phrase that is used for
each holiday.
Attempt to explain what this phrase
means, and how it
relates to each holiday. Relate as well to
Shmot 12:14.
Is this phrase for each holiday
identical? If not, which
holiday(s) is different? [Relate to the word
"moshvoteichem"
in each!]
Can you explain why this word is missing
in specifically
in regard to "succot"? Relate your answer to
the pasuk that
follows: "ba'sukkot tayshvu shivat yamim..."
(see 23:41-42),
and why Succot should be different in this
regard.
==========
PART II - QUESTIONS FOR PREPARATION (for
weekly shiur)
1. In Parshat Emor (chapter 23) we find a
complete list of the
Jewish holidays. Where else in Chumash do we
find a set of
laws that discusses either all (or at least
most) of the
Holidays? [If [/or when] you give up, see
Shmot 23:24-20,
34:18-26, & Bamidbar chapters 28-29 and
Devarim chapter 16.]
As your study those units, see if you
can identify
different 'categories' of Holidays. Explain
how your division
is based on how they are presented in
Chumash.
2. In what manner is the presentation of the
CHAGIM in Parshat
Emor different than the others? In what
manner is it similar?
Can you identify a unifying theme for
the details about
the holidays that are mentioned in this
chapter?
3. Note the dates that the Torah uses for
each holiday. Are
they based on the solar calendar (i.e. the
agricultural
seasons) or lunar calendar (month/day)? [or
both?] Can you
explain why?
What type of date does the Torah use for
those same
holidays in the other parshiot of "chagim"
(as mentioned above
in question #1)?
4. As you study chapter 23, make a table
listing each of the
chagim. For each chag, note the mitzvot that
are mentioned.
Which of these mitzvot are 'shared' by
all (or most) of
the other chagim as well, and which of these
mitzvot are
unique for that specific chag?
Attempt to explain the reason for each
mitzvah?
As you study this chapter, make note as
well when there
is a new "dibur" and attempt to explain why
each one is
necessary.
5. Note that every holiday in Parshat Emor
includes the
commandment "v'hikravtem ishe l'Hashem". Scan
the parsha to
verify that this is indeed true, and if there
are any
'exceptions'.
What "ishe" (offering) does the Torah
refer to in this
phrase:
- a private korban from each individual,
or
- a korban TZIBUR (from the entire
congregation)?
Can you relate this commandment to the
description of the
chagim in Parshat Pinchas (see Bamidbar
chapters 28->29)?
Relate in your answer to Vayikra 23:37! [See
Ramban 23:1-2]
6. In addition to this general commandment
to offer an
"ishe", this unit also includes several
examples of
commandments to offer a very specific korban.
As you review
from 23:1-44; attempt to find such examples.
Are these
korbanot identical to the korbanot described
in Parshat
Pinchas, or are they different?
Can you explain their purpose and why
they are different?
Do these specific korbanot that are
detailed in Parshat
Emor share any 'common denominator'? If so,
explain what it
is, and why?
7. Make a table listing all the holidays in
this Parshat Emor.
For each holiday, note its date (lunar and/or
solar) together
with the SPECIAL mitzvah for that chag. As
you make your
table, make note of either any historical or
agricultural
aspect relating to those chagim. [Relate to
both the mitzvot
that are mentioned in Emor, as well as the
mitzvot for each
holiday which you may be familiar with from
other sources.]
In your opinion, does the mitzvah to sit
in a succah (see
23:42-43) relate to the historical aspect of
Succot (i.e.
yetziat mitzraim) or to its agricultural
aspect (i.e.
temporary booths built by the farmers in the
field collecting
the harvest) - or both?
Quote psukim to support your answer.
[Relate also to
Succah 11b, "succah k'neged ananei kavod or
succot mamash".]
8. While reviewing your table, see if you
can identify any
type of relationship between the mitzvot of
each holiday and
their lunar and solar dates. [You can refer
to the parallel
units of the chagim in Sefer Shmot and Sefer
Devarim (chap.
16) to help answer this question.]
9. Which of the holidays are referred to as
"moadim" and which
are called "shabbatonim" (or "shabbat"), and
which chagim are
referred to as both? Be sure to note
23:11,15,16,24,32,39!).
In your answer, relate to the 'double'
description of
Succot in 23:33-43, noting the distinction
between "moed" and
"shabbaton" and their related mitzvot. Be
sure that you can
explain 23:37-39 and the use of the word
"ach". [Attempt to
relate this as well to the 'double header' in
23:1-3!]
In what manner does the final pasuk in
chapter 23
complement the opening pasuk of this chapter?
10. Based on our shiurim thus far in Sefer
Vayikra, why do you
think that chapter 23 is included in this
Sefer?
Does it relate to korbanot, to KEDUSHA,
etc.?]
Be sure to relate to the SPECIFIC
mitzvot of the chagim
(as well as the general mitzvot) that are
detailed in this
chapter.
PART III - PARSHANUT
STARTING ON 'SUNDAY' OR 'MOTZEI YOM TOV'?
1. A major debate exists concerning how to
explain the pasuk
that defines when we begin counting the OMER
-"m'mochorat
ha'shabbat" (see 23:11). In your opinion, why
does the Torah
refer to the first day of chag ha'matzot as a
"shabbat".
Can you relate your answer to the
questions in Part II
above?
Relate to how each of the chagim in some
manner or other
is referred to as a "shabbat" or "shabbaton".
See Rashi, Ramban, Ibn Ezra & Chizkuni and
Mesechet Menachot
61a.
Even though everyone agrees that shabbat
is referring to
the first day of yom-tov, each commentator
offers a different
reason why. Try to explain each "parshan" and
the reason for
the machloket.
TRANSMITTING GOD'S LAWS
2. Read 21:1 (the opening pasuk of the
Parsha). What is
problematic about the 'wording' of this
opening statement?
See Ramban on this pasuk, noting how he
first quotes
Rashi, then Ibn Ezra, and then offers his own
opinion.
Explain each of these three approaches.
Why do you think
that Ramban does not agree with either Rashi
or Ibn Ezra?
Finally, see Chizkuni on 21:1. In what
manner is his
pirush different? What does he learn from
"smichut parshiot"
between this pasuk and the last pasuk in
Parshat Kedoshim?
WHERE DID HE COME FROM?
3. Read 24:10, how did you translate the
opening phrase
["v'yatza ben isha yisraelit"] - i.e. what
does "va'yatza"
mean?
What are the different possibilities?
See Rashi - How does he understand this word?
What questions bother him based on this
understanding?
[Relate to all the questions raised by
the Midrash.] See
Ibn Ezra & Ramban.
How do they translate "va'yatze"? Do
they both offer the
same pirush? [If not, how do they differ?]
[Note also how Ibn Ezra later explains the
reason for the
"smichut parshiot" here!]
Finally, see Chizkuni. How does he explain
"va'yatza"?
In what manner is his pirush totally
different than all
of the others? Why does he refer to this as
"pshat"?
b'hatzlacha,
menachem
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.atlchai.org/pipermail/par-reg/attachments/20150430/c0d68089/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: kdoshq.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 40448 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.atlchai.org/pipermail/par-reg/attachments/20150430/c0d68089/attachment-0002.doc>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: kdoshq.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 33117 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.atlchai.org/pipermail/par-reg/attachments/20150430/c0d68089/attachment-0002.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: emorq.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 22542 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.atlchai.org/pipermail/par-reg/attachments/20150430/c0d68089/attachment-0003.doc>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: emorq.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 27665 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.atlchai.org/pipermail/par-reg/attachments/20150430/c0d68089/attachment-0003.pdf>
More information about the Par-reg
mailing list